COP 3402 Systems Software Euripides Montagne University of

  • Slides: 14
Download presentation
COP 3402 Systems Software Euripides Montagne University of Central Florida (Fall 2007) Eurípides Montagne

COP 3402 Systems Software Euripides Montagne University of Central Florida (Fall 2007) Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

COP 3402 Systems Software Top Down Parsing (Recursive Descent) Eurípides Montagne University of Central

COP 3402 Systems Software Top Down Parsing (Recursive Descent) Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Outline 1. The parsing problem 2. Top-down parsing 3. Left-recursion removal 4. Left factoring

Outline 1. The parsing problem 2. Top-down parsing 3. Left-recursion removal 4. Left factoring Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing The parsing Problem: Take a string of symbols in a language

Recursive descent parsing The parsing Problem: Take a string of symbols in a language (tokens) and a grammar for that language to construct the parse tree or report that the sentence is syntactically incorrect. For correct strings: Sentence + grammar parse tree For a compiler, a sentence is a program: Program + grammar parse tree Types of parsers: Top-down (recursive descent parsing) Bottom-up parsing. “We will focus in top-down parsing in only”. Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Recursive Descent parsing uses recursive procedures to model the parse tree

Recursive descent parsing Recursive Descent parsing uses recursive procedures to model the parse tree to be constructed. The parse tree is built from the top down, trying to construct a left-most derivation. Beginning with start symbol, for each non-terminal (syntactic class) in the grammar a procedure which parses that syntactic class is constructed. Consider the expression grammar: E T E’ E’ + T E’ | e T F T’ T’ * F T’ | e F ( E ) | id The following procedures have to be written: Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Procedure E begin { E } call T call E’ print

Recursive descent parsing Procedure E begin { E } call T call E’ print (“ E found ”) end { E } Procedure T begin { T } call F call T’ print (“ T found ”) end { T } Procedure E’ begin { E’ } If token = “+” then begin { IF } print (“ + found “) Get next token call T call E’ end { IF } print (“ E’ found “) end { E’ } Procedure T’ begin { T’ } If token = “ * ” then begin { IF } print (“ * found “) Get next token call F call T’ end { IF } print (“ T’ found “) end { T’ } Eurípides Montagne Procedure F begin { F } case token is “(“: print (“ ( found ”) Get next token call E if token = “)” then begin { IF } print (“ ) found”) Get next token print (“ F found “) end { IF } else call ERROR “id“: print (“ id found ”) Get next token print (“ F found “) otherwise: call ERROR end { F } University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Ambiguity if not the only problem associated with recursive descent parsing.

Recursive descent parsing Ambiguity if not the only problem associated with recursive descent parsing. Other problems to be aware of are left recursion and left factoring: Left recursion: A grammar is left recursive if it has a non-terminal A such that there is a derivation A A a for some string a. Top-down parsing methods can not handle left-recursive grammars, so a transformation is needed to eliminate left recursion. For example, the pair of productions: A A a | b could be replaced by the non-left-recursive productions: A b A’ A’ a A’ | e Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Left factoring: Left factoring is a grammar transformation that is useful

Recursive descent parsing Left factoring: Left factoring is a grammar transformation that is useful for producing a grammar suitable for predictive, or top-down, parsing. When the choice between two alternative A-production is not clear, we may be able to rewrite the production to defer the decision until enough of the input has been seen that we can make the right choice. For example, the pair of productions: A a b 1 | a b 2 could be left-factored to the following productions: A a A’ A’ b 1 | b 2 Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing New slides will be added soon… Eurípides Montagne University of Central

Recursive descent parsing New slides will be added soon… Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Recursive descent parsing Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Errors Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida

Errors Eurípides Montagne University of Central Florida