CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC INTRODUCTION Definitions Contrastive rhetoric is an

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC INTRODUCTION

CONTRASTIVE RHETORIC INTRODUCTION

Definitions „Contrastive rhetoric is an area of research in second language acquisition that identifies

Definitions „Contrastive rhetoric is an area of research in second language acquisition that identifies problems in composition encountered by second language writers and, by referring to the rhetorical strategies of the first language, attempts to explain them. ” (Ulla Connor, 1996: 5)

„Contrastive rhetoric has its origins in notions of language structure, learning and use which

„Contrastive rhetoric has its origins in notions of language structure, learning and use which are not strongly autonomous, and its goal is to describe ways in which written texts operate in larger cultural contexts. ” (Grabe & Kaplan, 1996: 5)

Robert Kaplan’s work • 1966: Culture-based thought patterns in writing English Semitic Oriental Romance

Robert Kaplan’s work • 1966: Culture-based thought patterns in writing English Semitic Oriental Romance Russian

Influences of the Kaplanean idea • L 1 in the way of logical thinking

Influences of the Kaplanean idea • L 1 in the way of logical thinking and linear discourse construction • Ethnocentric bias „whether the Japanese are capable of using logical arguments to the degree that other people are” (Hazen, 1986: 232) • Instructional focus: eliminating L 1 traditions, inculcating new L 2 patterns

Early research concerns: focus on differences • Reader/writer-friendly styles (Hinds, 1987) • Rhetorical organisation,

Early research concerns: focus on differences • Reader/writer-friendly styles (Hinds, 1987) • Rhetorical organisation, discourse structure (Clyne, 1987; Connor, 1987) • Cohesion and coherence (Connor, 1984) • Method: discourse analysis

Criticism of the Kaplanean idea • Comparing novice L 2 writing with professional L

Criticism of the Kaplanean idea • Comparing novice L 2 writing with professional L 1 writing • No control of topic, genre and length • Stereotypes, no concern for variation within a culture • Too broad categories • Ethnocentric

New trends • • Similarities (Connor, 1987, Wolfe, 2008) Development (Stalker & Stalker, 1989)

New trends • • Similarities (Connor, 1987, Wolfe, 2008) Development (Stalker & Stalker, 1989) New languages (Finnish, Polish, Czech) Intellectual styles, roots of differences(Ramanathan & Atkinson, 1999) • Fight for linguistic rights (Kubota, 1997; Kontra, 1997)

New concerns • Initiating into L 2 rhetorical practices (Connor & Mayberry’s 1996, Belcher

New concerns • Initiating into L 2 rhetorical practices (Connor & Mayberry’s 1996, Belcher & Connor, 2003) • Exploring roots and harmonising differences (Petric, 2004; Bloch 2008) • Writing as socially constructed activity (Hyland, 2008)

New methods • Practicioner research (Liu & You, 2008) • Insider (team) research (Yang

New methods • Practicioner research (Liu & You, 2008) • Insider (team) research (Yang & Cahill, 2008) • Focus on process vs. product • Ethnographic methods

Future directions • Looking for a global identity (Li, 2008) • Concern for methodology:

Future directions • Looking for a global identity (Li, 2008) • Concern for methodology: comparable corpora • Variety vs. stereotyping