Accreditation Institution Set Standards Philip Dykstra Director Institutional
- Slides: 15
Accreditation & Institution Set Standards Philip Dykstra Director, Institutional Research and Planning Accreditation Liaison Officer Liana Koeppel Communication Studies/Self Evaluation Chair
Accreditation Follow-up Report and Timeline • ACCJC Compliance Recommendation • Follow-up Report • Timeline
ACCJC Compliance Recommendation In order to meet the standards, the team recommends that the college complete a full review of its processes related to the assessment and review cycle of Student Learning Outcomes for all instructional courses/programs to ensure that all courses, programs, and directly related services are improved (II. A. 2, II. A. 16)
Follow-up Report • Report focuses solely on Compliance Recommendation • Follow-up Report due March 1, 2019 • Midterm Report due in October 2021
Timeline • Draft posted to website for Campus feedback (October 1) • Campus Feedback Open Forum (October 16) • Steering Committee Meets (October 31) • Present to Academic Senate (November 8) • Present to Board of Trustees (November 27 & January 22) • Final Report Due (March 1, 2019)
College Outcomes Assessment (COA) Review Cycle Plan • Campus Culture of Assessment • Cycle of Assessment • Comprehensive Integration of Assessment
Campus Culture of Assessment • Create a Campus-wide commitment to Outcomes Assessment • Consistent language • CSLO, SSSLO, ASO • PSLO, ISLO
Cycle of Assessment • Consistent Review Cycles
Comprehensive Integration of Assessment • Integration of Outcomes Assessment into Campus practices and procedures
Comprehensive Integration of Assessment Collect COA Data • Courses • Student Services • Campus Services • Program • Institution Analyze Data Resource Allocation Request • One-Time Funding • Emergency/Special Funding • Faculty Prioritization • Course SLOs (CSLOs) • Student Service SLOs (SSSLOs) • Administrative Service Outcomes (ASOs) • Program SLOs (PSLOs) • Institutional SLOs (ISLOs) Program Review • Instructional Program Review (PR) • Student Services Quality Review (SSQR) • Campus Services Quality Review (CSQR)
ACCJC Institution Set Standards Comparison over time Degree Completion 1, 201 845 1, 144 Certificate Completion 1, 387 1, 134 1, 078 667 546 2015 -16 2016 -17 Actual Year 1, 105 1, 006 2017 -18 2015 -16 Standard 2016 -17 Actual Target Actual Result 2015 -16 845 1, 201 ✓ 2016 -17 1, 078 1, 144 2017 -18 1, 134 1, 387 Year 876 759 2017 -18 Standard Target Actual Result 2015 -16 546 667 ✓ ✓ 2016 -17 759 1, 006 ✓ ✓ 2017 -18 876 1, 105 ✓
ACCJC Institution Set Standards Comparison over time Successful Course Completion 71. 2% 70. 5% 71. 1% 70. 7% Fall 2015 Fall 2016 894 863 919 903 916 637 Actual Year 72. 1% 71. 5% Transfer Volume Fall 2017 2015 -16 Standard 2016 -17 Actual Target Actual Result Fall 2015 71. 2% 70. 5% X Fall 2016 71. 1% 70. 7% Fall 2017 72. 1% 71. 5% Year 2017 -18* Standard Target Actual Result 2015 -16 863 894 ✓ X 2016 -17 903 919 ✓ X 2017 -18 916 Unknown ?
Strategic Plan/ISS Fund • 2017 -18 - $265, 713 requested $88, 806 expended • 4 projects fully funded • 2 projects partially funded
Making the ISS process better • Fall 2018 - Dialogue about all four ISS measures in PBC • Spring 2019 – set the ISS targets in PBC & prepare ACCJC annual report
Thank you and have a great semester!
- Philip dykstra
- Formal institution and informal institution
- Total set awareness set consideration set
- Training set validation set test set
- Joint commission international
- Cnea accreditation
- Joint commission accreditation standards
- Cihq accreditation standards
- Nwccu accreditation standards
- Factors determining service standards
- Total fixed overhead cost formula
- Correspondence function examples
- Fuzzy logic
- Crisp set vs fuzzy set
- What is the overlap of data set 1 and data set 2?
- Crisp set vs fuzzy set