The American System of Criminal Justice Eighth Edition
- Slides: 30
The American System of Criminal Justice, Eighth Edition by George F. Cole and Christopher E. Smith Chapter 1 Crime and Justice in America © 1998 Wadsworth / WEST Publishing Company
Crime ä A specific act of commission or omission in violation of the law for which a punishment is prescribed.
Crime and Justice as Public Police Issues Reiman argument: system designed to project the image of crime rather than to reduce crime or achieve justice. Reduce Crime Conservatives advocate stricter enforcement of laws. Democratic Values Liberals worry about reducing rights and due process.
Public Order and Individual Freedom The classic struggle law makers deal with is how to keep the public order while still insuring freedom for the individual.
Crime Control Model ä A model of criminal justice that assumes freedom is so important that every effort must be made to reduce crime so things like efficiency, speed and finality are emphasized. The system must have a high capacity to catch, convict and dispose of offenders.
Due Process Model ä A different model of the criminal justice system that assumes freedom is so important that every effort must be made to ensure the decisions are fair and reliable, based on law and formal proceedings.
Strengths/Weaknesses Crime Control Model Due Process Model ä Administrative ä Adversarial Process ä Efficient, Swift, costeffective ä Increased Safety ä Individual Rights? ä Individual Rights Stressed ä Reliability ä Constitution ä Inefficient and costly
Multicultural Concerns ä Many minorities are subjected to the criminal justice system more often than minority members. ä Disparity: A difference between groups that can be explained by legitimate factors. ä Discrimination: Groups are differentially treated without regard to their behavior or qualifications.
Possible explanations include: ä Minorities commit more crimes ä The criminal justice system is racist ä American society is racist
Politics of Crime and Justice ä Crime and Justice Issues Exist in a Political Sphere ä Crime Control Measures: ä What VOTERS want? ä Will Legislation Achieve Goals? ä E. g. , : Megan’s Law: Michigan's Sex Offender Registry
Goals of the Criminal Justice System Doing Justice Controlling Crime Preventing Crime
Federalism A system of government in which power is divided between a central (national) government and regional (state) governments.
Dual Justice Systems ä State systems handle alleged violations of state law. ä The federal system handles alleged violations of federal law.
Dual System: Recent Developments ä Increased Federalization of Crime: Now the federal government pursues organized crime gangs dealing with drugs, pornography, and gambling on a national basis. ä The existence of multiple criminal justice systems makes criminal justice in the United States highly decentralized.
Government and Criminal Justice: What are the connections? Judicial Branch - the courts Executive Branch President & Governors & administrative offices Legislative Branch those units that make substantive & procedural law
Executive Branch ä Carries out (executes) many acts of government ä Holds powers of appointment and pardons ä Provides leadership for crime control
Legislative Branch ä Defines criminal behavior ä Establishes penalties ä Passes laws governing criminal procedure ä Funds crime-control programs
Judicial Branch ä ä Administers the process by which criminal responsibility is determined Appellate courts interpret laws & review legislative decision making
The Systems Perspective: Exchange Relationships U. S. attorney Attorney general Courts County commissioners Prosecuting attorney Community influentials County agencies Defense lawyers Police
The Criminal Justice System (or Non-System)? ä How Well Do Various Criminal Justice Agencies Function as a “System”? ä Do Legislatures Realize the “Exchange Relations” of Systems Theory? ä 1994 Omnibus Violent Crime and Control Act: ä ä ä 100, 000 New Community Policing Officers New Drug Courts But, No NEW significant funding for Prosecutors, other Courts, or Community-Based Correction Programs
Characteristics of the Criminal Justice System Discretion: Ability to act according to one’s own judgment and conscious 2. Resource Dependence: CJ agencies to not produce their own resources, but depend on others for their allocation 3. Sequential Tasks: Each part of CJ system has distinct tasks that are carried out sequentially 4. Filtering: Process of screening cases 1.
Filtering Process SCAN IN PICTURE…. .
Politics of Criminal Justice Power held by few to control: ä Society in general ä Criminals What (or whose) standards define “control”?
Operations of Criminal Justice Agencies ä Police ä ä ä Most at Local Level Keeping Peace; Apprehending Violators Preventing Crime Providing Social Services ä Corrections ä ä Courts ä ä ä Dual Court System: judicial for each state and national system Different Interpretations in Different States Responsible for Adjudication Less Than 30% of convicted offenders are in prison or jails; the rest are being supervised in community-based corrections
Flow of Criminal Justice System ä Discretionary Decision ä ä The disposition of cases in the criminal justice system involves a series of decisions made by police officers, prosecutors, judges, probation officers, wardens, and other officials who decide whether a case will move on to the next point or be dropped from the system. See Page 27 -28 for Flow of Decision Making
Criminal Justice Wedding Cake: Layer 1 ä Celebrated perpetrators ä Celebrated victims ä Type the media loves ä Cases that make Supreme Court precedents 1
Criminal Justice Wedding Cake: Layer 2 ä Serious felonies by experienced offenders ä Violent crimes ä Property crimes with high $ value ä Get full attention of the CJ system 2
Criminal Justice Wedding Cake: Layer 3 ä First time offender less serious offenses which may be felonies ä Less serious personal injury or low $ value ä Dealt with less seriously, maybe probation 3
Criminal Justice Wedding Cake: Layer 4 ä ä Most misdemeanors Handled in assembly-line fashion Typical penalty is a small fine Having to go to court may be the “real” punishment 4
Important Implications to Wedding Cake Model ä Most attention is given to fewest number of cases ä Average Person’s Perception of CJ System is Result of Celebrated Cases ä Greatest Number of Offenders Are Low-Level Offenders
- The american system of criminal justice 16th edition
- The american system of criminal justice 16th edition
- Criminal justice the essentials 5th edition
- Psychology eighth edition david g myers
- David g myers psychology 8th edition
- Operations management eighth edition
- Four pillars of criminal justice system
- Arizona criminal justice information system
- Responsibilities and functions of saps
- Notas rojas
- Ccjp guelph
- State of connecticut division of criminal justice
- Funnel effect criminal justice
- Grass eater police
- Criminal justice lesson
- Consensus model criminal justice
- Consensus model criminal justice
- Intro to corrections
- Interpret
- Behavioral theory in criminal justice
- Consensus model criminal justice
- Consensus model criminal justice
- Consensus model criminal justice
- Nonintervention perspective of criminal justice
- Criminal law and juvenile justice unit 2
- Criminal justice wedding cake layers
- Nys division of criminal justice services
- National archive of criminal justice data
- Criminal justice
- Residential intermediate sanctions
- Conflict theory criminal justice