Research Seminar CPIT 695 Research Proposal Design your

  • Slides: 25
Download presentation
Research Seminar – CPIT 695 Research Proposal: Design your Proposal 1

Research Seminar – CPIT 695 Research Proposal: Design your Proposal 1

Thesis Proposal n To identify research point and potential supervisor

Thesis Proposal n To identify research point and potential supervisor

Ingredients of the Proposal n Evaluation will be based on:

Ingredients of the Proposal n Evaluation will be based on:

Thesis Title n n n The title should be clear, unambiguous, and not cute

Thesis Title n n n The title should be clear, unambiguous, and not cute The words should reflect the focus of your proposal Put the most important words first

Research Objectives (Steps)…(1) 1. State the “specific” aims A Specific aim is a statement

Research Objectives (Steps)…(1) 1. State the “specific” aims A Specific aim is a statement of what you hope to accomplish in order to solve a specific problem (doesn't need to be measurable) n Example: n To investigate using a systematic literature review the current pedagogical approaches or/and emerging technological solutions in CSE

Research Objectives (Steps)…(2) 2. State the means to achieve the specific aim The means

Research Objectives (Steps)…(2) 2. State the means to achieve the specific aim The means have to be scientific (objective or subjective), effective, verifiable, learnable, and affordable n Example: A mean can be a product, a prototype or a simulation or a model

Research Objectives (Steps)…(3) 3. Write the objective by Connecting the aims to the means

Research Objectives (Steps)…(3) 3. Write the objective by Connecting the aims to the means using action verbs. Action verbs are self explanatory verbs that indicate clearly the nature of action to be taken in order to accomplish the aim Its good to have SMART objectives. n Example Actions verbs: (To develop, To build, To study, to identify, to qualify…. . etc)

Example of good/bad research objectives

Example of good/bad research objectives

Research Seminar – CPIT 695 How to Write a good literature Review ? 9

Research Seminar – CPIT 695 How to Write a good literature Review ? 9

What is the literature? n n n n Before you read; check the date

What is the literature? n n n n Before you read; check the date on the literature JOURNAL ARTICLES: Most up-to-date but still about 2 years old. INTERNET SOURCES: Use only refereed electronic journals. CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: Latest research, but not yet published as full papers. GOVERNMENT AND CORPORATE REPORTS: Good resources for commissioned research. THESES AND DISSERTATIONS: Limited use, may be difficult to obtain, researcher usually inexperienced. BOOKS: Less up to date than journals, can be a good starting point, e. g. , Annual Reviews

What you need to do? n n n Read the papers in your binder

What you need to do? n n n Read the papers in your binder Think about papers in your binder Talk about the papers in your binder n n n Talk to your professors Talk to each other And while reading, thinking and talking n n Look up the references for background material listed in the binder … … and look up papers of interest from the reference lists of provided papers.

Resources for online materials n n ACM IEEE Xplore Sciencedirect Google

Resources for online materials n n ACM IEEE Xplore Sciencedirect Google

Keep track of what you read n n n Your references must be accurate:

Keep track of what you read n n n Your references must be accurate: Type them only once and make sure they are correct – Format them now to save time Make sure the content goes with the reference – Keep good notes, i. e. , annotate your reference list.

Endless iteration

Endless iteration

Writing LR: What LR does? n n SUMMARIZE the literature EVALUATE the literature SHOW

Writing LR: What LR does? n n SUMMARIZE the literature EVALUATE the literature SHOW RELATIONSHIPS between different studies (e. g. , differences in methodology) And in a research proposal – SHOW PUBLISHED WORK RELATED to your work

LR must be: n n Accurate: e. g. , Citations correct, findings attributed to

LR must be: n n Accurate: e. g. , Citations correct, findings attributed to authors correctly. Complete: i. e. , Include all important papers (not every paper written on the topic).

LR answers: What do we know about the area of inquiry? n What are

LR answers: What do we know about the area of inquiry? n What are the relationships between key concepts, factors, variables? n What are the current theories? n What are the inconsistencies and other shortcoming? n What needs further testing because evidence is lacking, inconclusive, contradictory, limited? n What designs or methods are faulty? n Why study this question further? Above questions should be in your mind while reading and writing LR n

Be warned to: n n Trying to read everything: Try to read the most

Be warned to: n n Trying to read everything: Try to read the most relevant work instead. n Preauthorize! (most important then important) Reading but not writing: Writing is a way of thinking… write many drafts n Read with purpose n Write with purpose Failing to keep bibliographic information: Remember that you will be writing a page entitled “References” at some point. Organizing your review chronologically: Organize your paper by ideas.

Golden Rules for Postgraduate Research Proposals n n Contents: n Be clear, objective, succinct

Golden Rules for Postgraduate Research Proposals n n Contents: n Be clear, objective, succinct and realistic in your objectives n Ask yourself why should anyone fund this research and/or why you are the best person for this project n Ask yourself why this research is important and/or timely n State and justify your objectives clearly (“because it is interesting” is not enough!) n Make sure you answer the questions: how will the research benefit the wider society or contribute to the research community? Style: n If space allows, provide a “punchy” project title n Structure your text – if allowed use section headings n Present the information in short paragraphs rather than a solid block of text n Write short sentences n If allowed, provide images/charts/diagrams which may help break up the text

Golden Rules for Postgraduate Research Proposals n The Process: n Identify prospective supervisors and

Golden Rules for Postgraduate Research Proposals n The Process: n Identify prospective supervisors and discuss your idea with them. n Avoid blanket general e-mails to several prospective supervisors! n Allow plenty of time – a rushed proposal will show. n Get feedback from your prospective supervisor. Be prepared to take their comments on board. n If applying to an external funding agency, remember that the reviewer may not be an expert in your field of research n Stick to the guidelines and remember the deadline

Making a good proposal n There are stylistic “golden rules” which contribute to a

Making a good proposal n There are stylistic “golden rules” which contribute to a good proposal: n n n n Be clear, objective and straight to the point (No waffle!) Justify your objectives: “because it is interesting” is not enough! Provide a structure and use headings Avoid long solid blocks of text and use smaller paragraphs Write short sentences If allowed and if helpful, insert images/charts/diagrams to help break up text. Stick to guidelines and the deadline!

Research Proposal n n Research proposals have a limit on words or pages so

Research Proposal n n Research proposals have a limit on words or pages so you won’t be able to analyse the whole existing body of literature. Choose key research papers or public documents and explain clearly how your research will either fill a gap, complete or follow on from previous research even if it is a relatively new field or if you are applying a known methodology to a different field

Literature Review n n n n Dissertation research -- your advisor may give you

Literature Review n n n n Dissertation research -- your advisor may give you “key" papers to get you started; read these first and seek out the articles that are cited Start with the most recent sources; there is a “mushroom effect“ as you go back in time Encyclopedia articles and books are sometimes a good way to start, but remember there are likely more recent sources Articles that are almost always cited are probably “key" to the development of the area or were among the first in the area A recurring set of authors will emerge; articles by these authors are probably “more important" A paper with an accompanying discussion may often be “important” Usually articles in “main" or “first-tier" journals are the most important, but this is not always true Do not print, copy, download every and any paper you identify! Instead, read the abstract, introduction, and conclusions or discussion sections. A paper might not be what you think it is.

How to read n n n Because of space considerations, journal articles often leave

How to read n n n Because of space considerations, journal articles often leave out a good deal of technical detail (“It may be shown that. . . ") Initially, you may wish to verify as many details as you can. But this can be frustrating and time consuming and may get you of the track. Read first instead for the main ideas and message to see if the paper is of interest; you can verify details later. You will certainly want to verify all the details in the ”seminal“ and “key" papers in your dissertation area As you learn more about an area, you will begin to see patterns in the kinds of results and arguments that arise As we will discuss, the quality of the writing is often a help or a hindrance Keep dated, detailed notes of any calculations you carry out or thoughts you have when reading a paper for later reference

References n n CPIT 695 Notes of Dr. Ahmad Barnawi Materials to refer: n

References n n CPIT 695 Notes of Dr. Ahmad Barnawi Materials to refer: n How to Write a Successful Ph. D Dissertation Proposal n Reference the literature review using Zotero (Video Provided) 25