Natural Law Stoicism Cleanthes the good lies in

Natural Law – Stoicism Cleanthes: the good lies in “living in agreement with nature” Stoics believed that the whole of the world was identical with the fully rational creature which is God, so human law must accord with God’s law

Natural Law – Roman Republic Cicero (106 -43 BCE). De Legibus ”the true and supreme law, whose commands and prohibitions are equally infallible, is the right reason of the Sovereign Deity” “no law but that of justice should either be proclaimed as a law or enforced as a law”

Natural Law – Catholicism Aquinas (1225 -1274) builds upon earlier Christian thinkers, esp. Augustine: “natural law is nothing else than the rational creature's participation in the eternal law”

Natural Law – International Law Grotius (Dutch, 1583 -1645) looks to natural law to provide justification for Dutch maritime rights and provide law beyond sovereignty Argues that the seas are the common property of all, given by God to further the good of humankind

Natural Law – English Natural Rights Tradition Locke as most significant figure (inspiration for Jefferson) Natural law for Locke was what pertained before political society Laws in political society must be compatible with natural law to be legitimate

Positive Law Jeremy Bentham (1748 -1832). Natural Law is “nonsense on stilts” Positivism tied to Bentham’s scientific philosophy, focus on empirical, focus is on law in action, rather than as normative system

Positive Law John Austin (1790 -1859) Law is command issued by the sovereign when that command is enforced by sanctions and the sovereign is obeyed by the majority

Positive Law Hans Kelsen (1881 -1973) “Law is not, as it is sometimes said, a rule. It is a set of rules having the kind of unity we understand by a system” “Pure Theory” of law excludes consideration of political choices behind law’s substance

Positive Law H. L. A. Hart (1907 -92) Rule of law requires both 1. Primary rules – obligations and prohibitions 2. Secondary rules – govern primary rules and give them proper effect, signaling when they are legitimate and defining their scope/power

Lon Fuller and Procedural Naturalism Fuller’s position lies between pure theory of natural law and legal positivism Fuller reacts to moral emptiness of positivism, and hopes to find substantive norms within law itself as a social practice Law provides social goods like stability and respect for human autonomy

“What I have called the internal morality of law is … a procedural version of natural law … concerned, not with the substantive aims of legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for governing human conduct must be constructed and administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be. ”

Legal Realism Reaction to legal formalism – belief that judges discover law in text or “call balls and strikes” Realists recognize flaws, limitations, and flexibility of law and judges must often make choices and consult their political and moral views Law is what legal institutions are likely to do/not do