monochromatization scenarios Marco Alan Valdivia U Guanajuato Frank

monochromatization scenarios Marco Alan Valdivia, U. Guanajuato Frank Zimmermann, CERN thanks to Alain Blondel, Anton Bogomyagkov, Vera Cilento, David d’Enterria, Dima El Khechen, Angeles Faus-Golfe, Patrick Janot, Andrea Latina, Eugene Levichev, Kazuhito Ohmi, Katsunobu Oide, Emmanuel Perez, Cecile Rimbault, Dmitry Shatilov, Jochem Snuverink, Valery Telnov, Kaoru Yokoya, Alexander Zholents 25 November 2020 The Future Circular Collider Innovation Study (FCCIS) project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant No 951754.

three scenarios baseline with crab cavities optimized by Alan alternatives with crossing angle

two cases for scenario 1 assume optimum case

optimum case for scenario 2 peak luminosity [1035 cm-2 s-1] c. m. energy [Ge. V]

peak luminosity versus s. W - 1 scenario 2 scenario 1

scenario 3: z-Ecm correlation of luminosity events built-in energy scan correlation with z tentative parameters at 62. 5 Ge. V sd Guinea-Pig simulation self-consistent simulation w qc=30 mrad (total) 0. 105 m 80 mm (with dispersion) 9 cm 15 mm 0. 0715% sd , tot 0. 51 nm sy 6 x 1010 14170 0. 075 % 2. 5 nm L 2. 75 x 1035 cm-2 s-1 xy 0. 061

peak luminosity versus s. W - 2 scenario 1 scenario 3

integrated luminosity CDR assumptions: 185 physics days per year, physics efficiency of 75% 1035 cm-2 s-1 → 1. 2 ab-1/year/IP 7. 6 x 1035 cm-2 s-1 → 9. 1 ab-1/year/IP

peak luminosity versus s. W - 3 scenario 2 scenario 1 scenario 3 Bogomyagkov & Levichev, PRAB 20, 051001 (2017) are our scenarios too optimistic?

raw data for plot scenario 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 sigma_W[Me. V] 31. 55464 21. 03643 15. 77732 12. 62186 10. 51821 9. 015611 7. 88866 7. 012142 6. 310928 Luminosity [1 E 35/cm^2/s] 6 4. 9 3. 8 3. 1 2. 6 2. 3 1. 9 1. 6 1. 1 1 63. 10928 7. 6 20. 7 15. 3 2. 75 scenario 2 scenario 3