MEASURING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS SATISFACTION TOWARD ONLINE

MEASURING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ SATISFACTION TOWARD ONLINE FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT STRATEGIES Name: Asti S. Nurazizah Affiliation: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Abstract Code: ABS-ICOLLITE-20104)

Introduction • The development of technology in education field • Digital Learning

Literature Review • assessment is defined as the test that is conducting by the teacher in during learning process (Brown, 2014) • Online quiz, the purpose of assessment will be easier to be achieve, due to it can easily be accessed via smartphones or PCs (Wichadee & Pattanapichet, 2018).

Research Methodology Research Method Qualitative and Quantitative Instruments Survey Method Questionnaire and Interview Research Design 4 Sample : 35 Teachers & 35 Students

Finding & Discussion Based on the finding above, there are variations in students’ satisfaction with formative online assessment strategies regarding the quality of student engagement. The results show that the respondents were, in most cases, dominantly satisfied with the quality of student engagement in formative e-assessment tasks they completed in knowledge survey.

Finding & Discussion • The students said that formative assessment is always given by the teachers to test students’ assessments. They said that teachers often made a quiz in Edmodo, Socartive, and Quizizz. Interview’s result also showed students agreed that formative online assessment was interesting. Most of them said that they did not feel bored. Besides, online quizzes are practice and simple

Conclusion q The construction of the learner satisfaction questionnaire was guided by the ‘the quality of student engagement’ and ‘the quality of feedback’ as the two important characteristics of any successful assessment that supports students’ learning. q The student feel satisfied when the teachers gives them formative assessment in online form.

• Bälter, O. , Enström, E. , & Klingenberg, B. (2013). The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback. Computers & Education, 60, 234– 242. • Bicen, H & Kocakoyu. (2019). Perception of students on gamification approach: kahoot case study. International journal of emerging technology in learning 13 (2). http: //refhub. elsevier. com/S 0360 -1315(19)30044 -2/sref 8 • Boon, A. (2013), “To- wards the Use of New Methods for Formative e-Assessment of 21 st Century Skills in Schools, ” In Technology Enhanced Formative Assessment (TEFA) workshop. • Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment, principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education. • Chung & Kaiser. (2018). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in Web-based learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 207– 217. • Denscombe, Martyn. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale social research projects. Mc. Graw-Hill Education (UK). • Hansen & Bahahti 2019 Measuring Learner Satisfaction with Formative e-Assessment Strategies. i. JET ‒ Vol. 14, No. 7, 2019 • Holmes, N. (2015). Student perceptions of their learning and engagement in response to the use of a continuous e-assessment in an undergraduate module, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 40. • Hwang, G. J. , & Chang, H. F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023– 103. • Klinkenberg, S. (2017). The Role of Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course. In Inter- national Computer Assisted Assessment Conference (pp. 63– 71). Springer, Cham. • Kordes, U, Sicherl K. B. & Holcar B. A. (2014) A Model of Formative Assessment in Music Education. Athens Journal of Education, 1(4), 295 -307 (Balta and Türel, 2013) • K. A. Thoirs, “Using online peer feedback in formative assessment for medical sonogra- phy students teaching: The student view”, Radiographer: The Official Journal of the Aus- tralian Institute of Radiography, The, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 26– 33, 2010. https: //doi. org/10. 1002/j. 2051 -3909. 2010. tb 00125. x. • Lawton, D. , Vye, N. , Bransford, J. , Sanders, E. , Richey, M. , French, D. , & Stephens, R. (2012). Online learning based on essential concepts and formative assessment. Journal of Engineering Educa- tion, 101(2), 244– 287. • Lin, J. W. , & Lai, Y. C. (2013). Harnessing collaborative annotations on online formative assessments. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(1), 263– 274. • Schmitt, N. & Schmitt, D. (2014). A Reassessment of Frequency and Vocabulary Size in L 2 Vocabulary Teaching. Language Teaching, 47(4), 484– 503. • Sibel, Halise. (2018). Implementation of the Digital Assessment Tool ‘Kahoot!’ in Elementary School. International Technology and Education Journal Vol. 2 No. 1; June 2018 ISSN: 26022885 URL: http: //itejournal. com/ 9 • Stošić, L. (2015). The Importance of Educational Technology in Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Reasearch in Science, Engineering, and Education, 3(1), 111 -114. • Thoirs, K. A (2010). Using online peer feedback in formative assessment for medical sonography students teaching: The student view”, Radiographer: The Official Journal of the Australian Institute of Radiography, The, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 26– 33, 2010. • Wang, F. , & Hannafin, M. J. (2005). Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5 -23. • Wichadee & Pattanapichet, 2018. Models of Lexical Knowledge Assessment of Second Language Learners of English at Higher Levels of Language Proficiency. System, 33, 547 -562.