Internet Telephony Vo IP Henning Schulzrinne Dept of

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
Internet Telephony (Vo. IP) Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003

Internet Telephony (Vo. IP) Henning Schulzrinne Dept. of Computer Science Columbia University Fall 2003

Overview l l l new Internet services: “telephone”, “radio”, “television” why Internet telephony? why

Overview l l l new Internet services: “telephone”, “radio”, “television” why Internet telephony? why not already? Internet telephony modalities components needed: – – – audio coding data transport quality of service – resource reservation signaling PSTN interworking: gateway location, number translation

Name confusion l Commonly used interchangeably: – – – l l Internet telephony Voice-over-IP

Name confusion l Commonly used interchangeably: – – – l l Internet telephony Voice-over-IP (Vo. IP) IP telephony (IPtel) Also: Vo. P (any of ATM, IP, MPLS) Some reserve Internet telephony for transmission across the (public) Internet Transmission of telephone services over IP-based packet switched networks Also includes video and other media, not just voice

New Internet services l l tougher: replacing dedicated electronic media vs. new modes (web,

New Internet services l l tougher: replacing dedicated electronic media vs. new modes (web, email) distribution media (radio, TV): hard to beat one antenna tower for millions of $30 receivers typewriter model of development radio, TV, telephone: a (protocol) convergence?

The phone works – why bother with Vo. IP user perspective carrier perspective variable

The phone works – why bother with Vo. IP user perspective carrier perspective variable compression: tin can to broadcast quality no need for dedicated lines better codecs + silence suppression – packet header overhead = maybe reduced bandwidth security through encryption shared facilities simplify management, redundancy caller & talker identification advanced services better user interface (more than 12 keys, visual feedback, semantic rather than stimulus) cheaper bit switching no local access fees (but dropping to 1 c/min for PSTN) fax as data rather than voiceband data (14. 4 kb/s) adding video, application sharing is easy

Emergency Calling l l l 911 in North America, 112 in Europe, others elsewhere

Emergency Calling l l l 911 in North America, 112 in Europe, others elsewhere First implemented 1968 in US, now roughly 95% of US population Basic 911 service: route emergency call to nearest emergency call center (public safety answering point – PSAP) Later, enhanced 911 (E-9 -1 -1) for selective routing and conveying caller location information to PSAP Roughly, 150 million 911 calls per year (2000) – l 45 million wireless For wireless: Phase I and Phase II – – Phase I conveys call back number + Pseudo-ANI (cell face identifier) to PSAP Phase II provides caller location (e. g. , via GPS or TOA)

Wireless 911 Phase II - TDOA Bell. South

Wireless 911 Phase II - TDOA Bell. South

Wireless 911 Phase II - EOTD Bell. South

Wireless 911 Phase II - EOTD Bell. South

Wireless 911 Phase II l l l Accuracy 67% 95% Handset-based 50 m 150

Wireless 911 Phase II l l l Accuracy 67% 95% Handset-based 50 m 150 m Network-based 100 m 300 m Example: Sprint PCS and Nextel use GPS Implementation just starting Vol. P has similar problems as wireless: – devices change “network attachment point”

E 9 -1 -1 Call flow elements - wireline End office Loop Acces s

E 9 -1 -1 Call flow elements - wireline End office Loop Acces s Contr ol ie DLC Syste m ES Trunks E 9 -1 -1 Tandem w/SRDB Public Safety Answering Point EM Trunks PSAP ALI Data Links The Local Loop ALI SCP GATEWAY (Firewall) Recent Change Links DBMS Update Links Service Providers ALI Database Elements

E 9 -1 -1 CALL FLOW ELEMENTS - WIRELESS PDE 3 4 MPC E

E 9 -1 -1 CALL FLOW ELEMENTS - WIRELESS PDE 3 4 MPC E 2 TD 2 1 MSC ALI/SR DBASE 8 5 E 9 -1 -1 Tandem w/SRDB L’s 9 6 PSAP Public Safety Answering Point #9 is only applicable in a CAS-Hybrid architecture, such as Bell. South’s WLS 911 Solution 7