CEO Overconfidence Corporate Investment Activity and Performance Evidence

  • Slides: 11
Download presentation
‘CEO Overconfidence, Corporate Investment Activity, and Performance: Evidence from REITs ’ Prof. Dr. Piet

‘CEO Overconfidence, Corporate Investment Activity, and Performance: Evidence from REITs ’ Prof. Dr. Piet Eichholtz Erkan Yönder Maastricht University ERES 2011 Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Behavioral Biases in Finance Theory …not sufficiently investigated on professional managers § Overconfidence is

Behavioral Biases in Finance Theory …not sufficiently investigated on professional managers § Overconfidence is one of the behavioral biases that has been documented mainly on individual investors. (Benos, 1998, Hirshleifer and Luo, 2001, etc. ) § But not sufficiently on professional managers. The few exceptions include most notably the empirical work by Malmendier and Tate (2005), Crane and Hartzell (2010). § In this project, we aim to investigate overconfidence of professional managers using a (Real Estate Investment Trusts) REIT sample. 2

CEO Overconfidence …a behavioral bias § Overconfident people believe that they are «better-than-average» .

CEO Overconfidence …a behavioral bias § Overconfident people believe that they are «better-than-average» . (Miller and Ross, 1975) § They are too optimistic about their decisions. They overestimate the returns to their investment projects. q They underestimate the risks associated with their decisions. (Hirshleifer and Luo, 2001) q § Overconfident managers overinvest… q Malmendier and Tate (2005) propose 3 overconfidence measures. (Holder 67, Long Holder and Net Buyer) 3

Net Buyer of Own Company’s Stocks …good vs. bad performance An overconfident CEO is

Net Buyer of Own Company’s Stocks …good vs. bad performance An overconfident CEO is a «net buyer» of own company’s stocks throughout the sample period. Net buyer of own company’s stock Positive private information Overconfidence Suboptimal investment activity Good performance Bad performance 4

Why REITs? …better observable investment activity § Investment decisions can easily be identified. §

Why REITs? …better observable investment activity § Investment decisions can easily be identified. § Easy to observe how much a firm spent when investing in a project. § Accurate investment frequency can be determined at corporate level. § Only largest investment decisions can be observed with M&A. § Different from M&A, selling activity can be observed. REITs offer a unique labarotary environment to test the effect of overconfidence on professional managers’ investment decisions and performance. 5

Data & Model § Sample q q q 161 U. S. REITs Annual data

Data & Model § Sample q q q 161 U. S. REITs Annual data from 2003 -2008 Collected from SEC Reports, SNL, Worldscope § Investment Activity (Brounen, Eichholtz, and Ling, 2007) (1) Purchasing Activity = f(net buyer dummy, financial determinants, property type, time dummies, u) (2) Sales Activity = g(net buyer dummy, financial determinants, property type, time dummies, u) 6

Investment Activity and Overconfidence …overconfident CEOs purchase more VARIABLES (1) Purchasing (USD value) Net

Investment Activity and Overconfidence …overconfident CEOs purchase more VARIABLES (1) Purchasing (USD value) Net Buyer 0. 094*** [0. 023] ln(Size) 0. 019** [0. 008] Age -0. 003*** [0. 001] Debt Ratio(t-1) -0. 103* [0. 055] Cash(t-1) 0. 126 [0. 165] M/B(t-1) 0. 052** [0. 026] Constant -0. 111 [0. 120] (2) Purchasing (# of properties) 0. 074** [0. 031] -0. 005 [0. 012] -0. 002** [0. 001] -0. 162** [0. 066] 1. 258*** [0. 191] 0. 112*** [0. 034] 0. 160 [0. 175] (3) Sales (USD value) -0. 021** [0. 010] 0. 006 [0. 004] 0. 000 [0. 000] 0. 028 [0. 023] -0. 005 [0. 068] -0. 013 [0. 011] -0. 053 [0. 054] (4) Sales (# of properties) -0. 024* [0. 013] 0. 006 [0. 005] 0. 001 [0. 000] 0. 043 [0. 028] -0. 035 [0. 081] -0. 024* [0. 014] -0. 029 [0. 072] Property Type Year Dummy Yes 496 133 0. 21 Yes 538 143 0. 10 Yes 496 133 0. 09 Observations # of REITs R-squared Yes 538 143 0. 17 7

Performance Regressions …overconfident CEOs underperform VARIABLES Net Buyer Debt Ratio ln(Size) ln(FFO) Constant Property

Performance Regressions …overconfident CEOs underperform VARIABLES Net Buyer Debt Ratio ln(Size) ln(FFO) Constant Property Type Year Dummy Observations Number of REITs R-squared Chi-Squared Prob. (1) ALPHA -0. 011* [0. 006] -0. 036** [0. 018] 0. 015 [0. 010] Yes 637 154 (2) ALPHA -0. 006 [0. 007] -0. 047** [0. 020] 0. 003 [0. 007] 0. 001 [0. 007] -0. 044 [0. 041] Yes 572 147 28. 20 0. 0017 32. 63 0. 0011 (3) TOBIN’S Q -0. 186*** [0. 039] -0. 350*** [0. 079] -0. 117*** [0. 018] 0. 077*** [0. 013] 2. 419*** [0. 205] Yes 577 154 0. 39 (4) ROA -0. 823** [0. 353] -5. 305*** [0. 916] -1. 690*** [0. 223] 1. 704*** [0. 187] 13. 300*** [2. 088] Yes 577 154 0. 32 (5) ROE -6. 265** [2. 704] 11. 660* [6. 845] -6. 621*** [1. 647] 5. 551*** [1. 360] 36. 115** [15. 825] Yes 577 154 0. 12 8

Extended Overconfidence Measure …only underperforming net buyers purchase more VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4)

Extended Overconfidence Measure …only underperforming net buyers purchase more VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Purchasing Purchasing (USD value) (USD value) Net Buyer*Low ROA 0. 120*** [0. 023] Net Buyer*Low ROE 0. 135*** [0. 023] Net Buyer*Low Alpha(t+1) 0. 053** [0. 022] Net Buyer*High ROA -0. 024 [0. 029] Net Buyer*High ROE -0. 041 [0. 029] Net Buyer*High Alpha(t+1) Constant Controls Property Type Year Dummy Observations Number of REITs R-squared -0. 092 [0. 111] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 20 -0. 143 [0. 112] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 21 0. 031 [0. 121] Yes Yes 493 135 0. 15 0. 084 [0. 117] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 14 0. 085 [0. 116] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 14 (6) Purchasing (USD value) 0. 031 [0. 024] 0. 065 [0. 120] Yes Yes 493 135 0. 14 9

Extended Overconfidence Measure …outperforming net buyers sell more VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)

Extended Overconfidence Measure …outperforming net buyers sell more VARIABLES (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Sales Sales (USD value) (USD value) Net Buyer*Low ROA -0. 046*** [0. 010] Net Buyer*Low ROE -0. 045*** [0. 010] Net Buyer*Low Alpha(t+1) -0. 024** [0. 009] Net Buyer*High ROA 0. 036*** [0. 012] Net Buyer*High ROE 0. 033*** [0. 012] Net Buyer*High Alpha(t+1) Constant Controls Property Type Year Dummy Observations Number of REITs R-squared -0. 028 [0. 051] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 06 -0. 021 [0. 052] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 07 -0. 079 [0. 053] Yes Yes 493 135 0. 04 -0. 112** [0. 051] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 06 -0. 104** [0. 051] Yes Yes 538 143 0. 06 (6) Sales (USD value) -0. 001 [0. 010] -0. 102* [0. 053] Yes Yes 493 135 0. 03 10

Concluding Remarks • Overconfident CEOs significantly purchase more properties than nonoverconfident counterparts. • Overconfident

Concluding Remarks • Overconfident CEOs significantly purchase more properties than nonoverconfident counterparts. • Overconfident CEOs significantly sell less properties than nonoverconfident counterparts. • Overconfident CEOs significantly have worse operating performance than non-overconfident counterparts. • An interaction dummy of being a bad performer and being a net buyer of own company stocks gives stronger results. • When we use an interaction dummy of being a good performer and a net buyer of own company stocks, it even has opposite impacts on purchasing and sales activities. 11