XDX Ops Test Validation Preliminary Results Chicago KFC

  • Slides: 12
Download presentation
XDX Ops Test Validation Preliminary Results • • • Chicago (KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco

XDX Ops Test Validation Preliminary Results • • • Chicago (KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell) Louisville (A&W) Orlando (A&W, KFC, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell)

Key Learnings • Significant Temperature Improvement – Average Temperature Reduction • Walk-in cooler reduced

Key Learnings • Significant Temperature Improvement – Average Temperature Reduction • Walk-in cooler reduced 4 o- 6 o F • Walk-in freezer reduced 12 o- 14 o F – Temperature Range Tightened • Annual Energy Savings – Walk-in cooler & freezer energy savings • 24% - 35% average reduction/store – Roof Top Unit (RTU) energy savings • 18% average reduction/store 2

Recommendations • Further Validate Performance In an Expanded Field Test – Test in company

Recommendations • Further Validate Performance In an Expanded Field Test – Test in company stores in markets with high AC usage and high energy costs • DMA 534 (Orlando) • DMA 539 (Tampa) • DMA 623 (Dallas) – Test in stores that have multi-channel energy monitors for pre/post comparison • Wichita, Mc. Kinney, Louisville Brand DMA 534 DMA 539 DMA 623 Total A&W 1 1 KFC 32 29 62 123 LJS 6 13 43 62 Pizza Hut 81 114 195 Taco Bell 32 28 76 137 Total 153 70 295 518 3

Ops Test Data 4

Ops Test Data 4

Walk-in Results Chicken Cooler 5

Walk-in Results Chicken Cooler 5

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 6

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 6

Walk-in Results Walk-in Freezer 7

Walk-in Results Walk-in Freezer 7

Walk-in Results Pizza Hut Orlando Veg Cooler k. Wh Data Coming Soon Vegetable Cooler

Walk-in Results Pizza Hut Orlando Veg Cooler k. Wh Data Coming Soon Vegetable Cooler 8

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 9

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 9

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 10

Walk-in Results Vegetable Cooler 10

Walk-in Results Walk-in Freezer 11

Walk-in Results Walk-in Freezer 11

RTU Energy Savings 12

RTU Energy Savings 12