x Energy Analysis of Underground Coal Gasification with

  • Slides: 20
Download presentation
x Energy Analysis of Underground Coal Gasification with Simultaneous Storage of Carbon Dioxide Ali

x Energy Analysis of Underground Coal Gasification with Simultaneous Storage of Carbon Dioxide Ali Akbar Eftekhari Hans Bruining

(Enriched) Air CO, CO 2, H 2 O, CH 4, N 2 Water (Steam)

(Enriched) Air CO, CO 2, H 2 O, CH 4, N 2 Water (Steam) C + 2 H 2 O + Ca. O Ca. CO 3 + 2 H 2 + 87. 9 k. J/mol Exergy Analysis

Exergy Analysis of Energy Recovery Processes CO 2 Capture and Storage Energy CO 2

Exergy Analysis of Energy Recovery Processes CO 2 Capture and Storage Energy CO 2 Capture and Storage Recovery Process Source Recovery Process Energy Consumption

Zero-emission recovery factor Natural Gas (62%) Coal (56%) Ref: Dellucci, 2003; Except the CCS

Zero-emission recovery factor Natural Gas (62%) Coal (56%) Ref: Dellucci, 2003; Except the CCS data

UCG with mineral injection High Temperature: Ca. CO 3 Ca. O + CO 2

UCG with mineral injection High Temperature: Ca. CO 3 Ca. O + CO 2 Volume Constraint: 5

Independent reactions n Combustion q n C + O 2 CO 2 + 393.

Independent reactions n Combustion q n C + O 2 CO 2 + 393. 77 k. J/mol Gasification q Global reaction n q C + CO 2 2 CO – 172. 58 k. J/mol Shift reaction n q C + 2 H 2 O + Ca. O Ca. CO 3 + 2 H 2 + 87. 9 k. J/mol Boudouard reaction n q Exothermic Endothermic CO + H 2 O CO 2 + H 2 – 41. 98 k. J/mol Methanation n C + 2 H 2 CH 4 + 74. 90 k. J/mol Very Slow

Equilibrium relations yi: gas phase mole fraction P 0: standard pressure (1 bar) P:

Equilibrium relations yi: gas phase mole fraction P 0: standard pressure (1 bar) P: system pressure Kj: equilibrium constant of reaction j vi, j: stoichiometric coefficient of component i in reaction j Φi: fugacity coefficient of component i in a gas mixture

Temperature constraint at P=80 bar Volume constraint

Temperature constraint at P=80 bar Volume constraint

Optimum composition (O 2 injection) Composition (dry basis) H 2 0. 46 CO 2

Optimum composition (O 2 injection) Composition (dry basis) H 2 0. 46 CO 2 0. 08 CO 0. 32 CH 4 0. 14 Higher heating value (MJ/m 3) 14. 679 Lower heating value (MJ/m 3) 13. 286

Process flow diagram (1) E 5 E 1 ERes E 2 Egain E 4

Process flow diagram (1) E 5 E 1 ERes E 2 Egain E 4 E 3 η = (Egain - (∑Ei +ECCS ))/ERes ECCS

From theory to practice Zero-emission (Sustainable) Theoretical Practical

From theory to practice Zero-emission (Sustainable) Theoretical Practical

Results of PFD (1) Recovery factor (%) Theoretical, practical, and zero-emission recovery of coal

Results of PFD (1) Recovery factor (%) Theoretical, practical, and zero-emission recovery of coal energy (water to oxygen molar ratio of 3. 2)

Process flow diagram (2)

Process flow diagram (2)

Sustainable recovery for other energy conversion processes

Sustainable recovery for other energy conversion processes

Conclusion n n In situ introduction of absorbent e. g. Ca. O is energetically

Conclusion n n In situ introduction of absorbent e. g. Ca. O is energetically expensive and with the current state of technology is not feasible Using naturally abundant minerals can improve the exergetic recovery of UCG process

Coal Zero-emission Recovery

Coal Zero-emission Recovery

Natural gas sustainable recovery

Natural gas sustainable recovery

Formulation

Formulation

Exergy? n n Energy = Exergy + Anergy Exergy is a portion of energy

Exergy? n n Energy = Exergy + Anergy Exergy is a portion of energy that potentially can be converted to mechanical work 1 k. J of Electricity = 1 k. J of Exergy + 0 k. J of Anergy 1 k. J of energy in hot water at 70 o. C = 0. 13 k. J Exergy + 0. 87 Anergy Energy is conserved; Exergy is consumed