WY Mark Daluge Teton County Weed and Pest

WY: Mark Daluge, Teton County Weed and Pest District WA: Greg Haubrich, WSDA SD: Ron Moehring, SDDA OR: Beth Myers-Shenai, ODA NV: Meghan Brown, NDA NM: Shannon Atencio, NM Forestry ND: Jim Hansen, NDDA MT: Dave Burch, MDA ID: Stephen Cox, ISDA; Joey Milan, BLM; Tyler Nelson, Idaho Dept. of Lands CO: Steve Ryder, CDA CA: Dean Kelch, CDFA, Bobbi Simpson, NPS BLM: Richard D. Lee

WA: Greg Haubrich, WSDA MT: Dave Burch, MDA ND: Jim Hansen, NDDA ID: Stephen Cox, ISDA; Joey Milan, OR: Beth Myers. BLM; Tyler Nelson, Shenai, ODA Idaho Dept. of Lands SD: Ron Moehring, WY: Mark Daluge, SDDA Teton County Weed and Pest NV: Meghan District Brown, NDA CA: Dean Kelch, CDFA, Bobbi Simpson, NPS CO: Steve Ryder, CDA NM: Shannon Atencio, NM Forestry plus… BLM: Richard D. Lee

There’s a full range. Not sure the question was clear. (3 people from ID answered 3 different ways. ) May want to come up with a checklist of features that define a “comprehensive statewide weed mapping system. ” BLM has the National Invasive Species Information Management System (NISIMS). Each Field Office contributes data, including the mapping of weed infestations.

Which federal agencies contribute data? USFS BLM NPS FWS WY WA SD OR NV NM ND MT ID CO CA

What mapping features are used? Phone apps Email alerts Prioritizat’n Mgmt track’g WY WA SD OR NV NM ND MT ID CO CA plus… ODA models weed habitat suitability.

What mapping features are you interested in? Phone apps Email alerts Prioritizat’n Mgmt track’g WY WA SD OR NV NM ND MT ID CO CA

Great - We have complete mapping for all the weeds we care about. Good - We have systematic mapping for a lot of weeds in a lot of areas, but need more. OK - We have some mapping data, but need a lot more to be useful at the statewide level.

WA: Statewide priorities are often agency-specific. Tiered weed listing drives priorities. ID: Area offices contribute acreage to a statewide solicitation for contractors to manage noxious weeds annually. CA: CDFA, Cal-IPC and local weed managers partner to set regional priorities. This process is in progress, with some areas done and others only planned. ND: The NDWCA. WY: Each county determines their priority levels. MT: Through EDDMap. S and the State Weed Coordinators Alliance. NPS: The EPMTs are required to use NISIMS but the parks aren't, and planning and regional priorities are not a part of this process. BLM: For Field Office prioritization, it is budgetdriven based, often, upon national priorities.

How important is it to plan landscape-level strategy across western states for addressing invasive plants? 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Critically important Moderately important Not important

Proposal for WWCC data-sharing task force Quarterly conference calls for reps from each state, with: § Presentations on particular features § Work toward: § Sharing current data with EDDMap. S § Getting federal lands data into EDDMap. S § Setting landscape-level strategy