Wuthering Heights essay 1000 1500 words Discuss the

Wuthering Heights essay 1000 -1500 words • Discuss the nature-nurture debate in Wuthering Heights comparing and contrasting two characters of your choice. One should represent ‘nature’, the other ‘nurture’. • Introduction: explain the age-old nature vs. nurture debate and relate it to themes of WH. Introduce the characters that you will compare and contrast. • Body paragraph 1: description character 1 and supporting claims that this character represents nature. • Body paragraph 2: description character 2 and supporting claims that this character represents nurture. • Body paragraph 3: highlight the parts you deem fit to compare and contrast, supporting your claim why the first character represents nature and the second nurture. • Conclusion: Sooo…? Why is it important that you illustrated this nature-nurture struggle through a character analysis? Because it shows that……

CATEGORY Intoductory paragraph Body paragraphs organization Focus on Topic (Content) Conclusion (Organization) Grammar & Spelling (Conventions) 4 -Exceeds Standard 3 -Meets Standard The introduction is inviting, states the The introduction clearly states the main topic and previews the structure main topic and previews the of the paper. The thesis is original and structure of the paper, but is not adds something to what we already particularly inviting to the reader. know. Thesis is clear, but not particularly original. Information is placed in a logical order and the way they are presented order, but the way in which they effectively keeps the interest of the are presented sometimes makes reader. the writing less interesting. Clear topic sentences and supportive sentences to clarify and explain. 2 -Almost at Standard The introduction states the main topic, but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper nor is it particularly inviting to the reader. Thesis is weak. 1 -Below Standard There is no clear introduction of the main topic or structure of the paper. Thesis is absent Information is not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader. Supportive sentences do not always clarify and explain the topic sentence Information is not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized. Supportive sentences do not clarify and explain the topic sentence. There is one clear, well-focused topic. Main idea is clear but the Main idea is somewhat clear but there Main idea stands out and is supporting information is general. is a need for more supporting supported by detailed information. The conclusion is strong and leaves The conclusion is recognizable and The conclusion is recognizable, but the reader with a feeling that they ties up almost all the loose ends. does not tie up several loose ends. understand what the writer is Restates thesis in fresh words Restates thesis but does not touch "getting at. " Restates thesis in and briefly touches upon main supporting claims fresh words, briefly touches upon supporting claims. sufficiently or presents new main supporting claims and leaves information in the closing paragraph. the reader with an interesting observation. . Consistently follows rules for spelling Generally follows rules for spelling Mostly does not follow rules of spelling and correct use of grammar. Uses and correct use of grammar. Mostly complete sentences and uses complete sentences generally and exhibits errors in sentence structure transitional devices well. uses transitional devices. that impede communication. Generally does not use transitional devices (or not well). The main idea is not clear. There is a seemingly random collection of information. There is no clear conclusion, the paper just ends or there is new information in the closing paragraph. Does not follow rules for spelling and correct use of grammar. Uses sentence structure that makes it quite difficult to understand. Does not use paragraphing.