WP 5 Peer Review Structure Peer Review A
- Slides: 10
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Peer Review A formative process that supports and helps universities to assess their current state of development in selected areas of their work. MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 1
WP 5 Peer Review Structure The Peer Review should be – constructive & helpful – non-threatening – non-competitive – non-invasive – respectful of privacy – bound by ethical rules on confidentiality – honest MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 2
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Purpose of the Peer Reviews is to create and test instruments and a methodology that can be used subsequently with non-MASSIVE Project universities in the six service areas chosen MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 3
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Implementation of the Peer Reviews in MASSIVE • • • 6 visits at 6 universities Konrad Morgan leads 3, Jeff Haywood leads 3 Konrad and Jeff consult regularly to ensure consistency Barcelona Seminar to help devise methodology 2 ‘pilots’ (Edinburgh, Budapest) then Budapest Seminar to help adjust and refine methodology • Collation of results from all 6 visits into report and finalised methodology MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 4
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Step-by-step guide to peer review visits…. MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 5
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Host university must: • Ensure that university senior management are aware of, and ideally involved in, review process • Provide team in advance with documentary evidence to read – or summaries if language problems • Help with choice of accommodation and travel if needed (hotel names, maps etc) • Provide visits to university facilities if appropriate • Provide room and services for visiting team – help with internet access for example • Arrange for team to meet sample of staff and students of university so that they can discuss service area provision with them, and brief these individuals as to the reason for and process of the visit • Help with provision of translations where necessary of vital documentation – this is clearly onerous and so will need to be negotiated between the visit team and the host. MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 6
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Visiting team of peer reviewers must: • Ensure that host university has questions well in advance and engage with them on any concerns and queries • Carry out visit in an informal and friendly manner – this is not a criticism process but a supportive / formative process – in English this is called ‘critical friend’ • Good and extensive notes will need to be taken – it may be useful to record all meetings and interviews for later reference – to ensure an accurate report is written. Responsibility for this should be decided within the team • At end of visit give quick (verbal probably) overview summary of findings to close visit in a visible manner • Write report from visit within 4 weeks of visit, send draft to host university for factual corrections within 2 weeks, and then complete final version of report within 4 more weeks (ie time elapsed = 10 weeks – last visit probably June 2006 – last report due mid Sept 2006 latest) • The report will become a public document and so should not attribute names of people to comments or quotations, and must respect confidentiality of participants and the university as necessary. MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 7
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Some issues & challenges • 6 universities not representative of all European HE • Small teams (3 persons) with uneven skills despite K&J consistency • Language of host vs languages of visitors (esp for docs) • Understanding ethos & culture of host university in 2 days • 6 areas – 3 people – 2 days!! – light touch/key questions • Recording & reporting • ‘One instant in time’ MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 8
WP 5 Peer Review Structure Some questions to discuss: • How to balance reading vs talking vs observing? • Getting a ‘reality check’ – how to know difference between what team is told & shown vs what really is • Fitting it all into the time – all team together or split into 3? • Other key issues for peer visits? ? ? – experiences from the seminar participants MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 9
WP 5 Peer Review Structure MASSIVE Barcelona Nov 2005 10
- Annotazioni sulla verifica effettuata peer to peer
- Peer-to-peer
- Peer to peer transactional replication
- Peer to peer transactional replication
- Gambar topologi peer to peer
- Esempi di peer to peer compilati
- Scheda osservazione tutor compilata
- Relazione finale docente tutor compilata
- Peer to peer l
- Peer to peer merupakan jenis jaringan… *
- Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system