Working Proposals 2015 2016 Rosrio D Laureano maria

Working Proposals 2015 - 2016 Rosário D. Laureano maria. laureano@iscte. pt D 2. 03

Working proposals 2015/16 The following proposals of work are based on MULTICRITERIA Decision Analysis (MCDA) for STRATEGIC DECISION MAKING, also known as Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) q Methodology MCDM is suitable for solving decision problems with some complexity: q we intend to evaluate the best alternative / option / action (for the evaluator / decision maker) against a relatively large number of decision criteria q but we have no way to satisfy all the criteria because they are conflicted / competitors.

Working proposals 2015/16 q There are several multi-criteria methods (MACBETH, AHP, ANP, MAUT (and extensions as MUSA and UTA), TOPSIS, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, …) which: q have an high application potential q could be compared regarding relative effectiveness in decision making q (in general) have a specific decision-making software (DMS) to implement it [see http: //www. mcdmsociety. org/soft. html and http: //www. cs. put. poznan. pl/ewgmcda/index. php/software ] MACBETH M-MACBETH; MAUT Right. Choice; AHP Make. It. Rational and Expert. Choice; ANP Super Decisions; ELECTRE III-IV Software; PROMETHEE The Smart Picker Pro Software; …

MCDM – alguns métodos FULL AGREGATION APPROACH (ESCOLA AMERICANA) q AHP – Analytic Hierarchy Process (Make. It. Rational, Expert. Choice) q Extensões do AHP q ANP – Analytic Network Process (Super Decisions) q MAUT – Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (Right. Choice) q Extensões do MAUT (ex. Mét. UTA) Working proposals 2015/16 OUTRANKING APPROACH (ESCOLA FRANCESA) q ELECTRE – ELimination Et Choix Traduisant la REalité (The Electre III-IV Software) q Extensões do ELECTRE q PROMETHEE – Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enriched Evaluation (The Smart Picker Pro Software) q Extensões do PROMETHEE q MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation Tec. Hnique (M-MACBETH) inclui conceitos das 2 Escolas, embora + da Americana Rosário Laureano 5ª aula – 04 Out. 2014

Working proposals 2015/16 q All following proposals use the MACBETH method Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation Tec. Hnique, although they may involve other methods. q The special emphasis given to this method is due to: q It allows a quantitative analysis of the decision problem only based on qualitative judgments by the evaluator /decision maker q It is very intuitive and challenging q. There is the M-MACBETH decision-making software facilitating its application.

Working proposals 2015/16 MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation

Working proposals 2015/16 MACBETH - Measuring Attractiveness by a Category Based Evaluation

Working proposals 2015/16 q 1 st Proposal Assessment of the location of an hostel in Lisbon city based on the characteristics and goals of the investment by means of the MACBETH method. q 2 nd Proposal Optimization of the fixed and mobile networks in a company given the recurring challenges of telecommunications and company characteristics by means of the MACBETH method. q 3 rd Proposal To apply the MACBETH method together with the Geographic Information System (GIS) in the telecommunication network planning and design.

Working proposals 2015/16 q 4 th Proposal Programming language assessment based on the programmer goals through MACBETH method. q 5 th Proposal To compare the use of M-MACBETH decisionmaking software with the use of another existing computerized multi-criteria decision support systems (that is, another existing DMS) and provide recommendations on implementing them. In this comparison we can turn to one of the problems solving indicated in previous proposals.