Working Memory Active shortterm memory Maintenance of taskrelevant

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
Working Memory Active short-term memory – Maintenance of task-relevant information online. Keeps relevant information

Working Memory Active short-term memory – Maintenance of task-relevant information online. Keeps relevant information available. Like RAM in a computer Close correspondence between working memory and consciousness

Delayed response tasks are used to WM in animals Spatial delayed response Object delayed

Delayed response tasks are used to WM in animals Spatial delayed response Object delayed response also alternation tasks In all cases, a response is based on some previous event that is relevant on the current trial, but not necessarily the next.

Sample What-Then-Where Task What Delay Test Array Where Delay Choice 4 objects and 4

Sample What-Then-Where Task What Delay Test Array Where Delay Choice 4 objects and 4 locations were used

Delayed paired associate task Fixation (2000 msec) Sample (500 msec) Delay (1000 msec) Test

Delayed paired associate task Fixation (2000 msec) Sample (500 msec) Delay (1000 msec) Test (500 msec) S 1 C 1 S 2 C 2 S 3 C 3

Important features of WM tasks A cue is followed by a delay and then

Important features of WM tasks A cue is followed by a delay and then two or more choices Delay is relatively short (about a second to about a minute). Small number of cues that are used repeatedly. A single cue is only relevant for one trial at a time and animals must remember

Delay tasks require that: 1. Animals discriminate among cues 2. Maintain memory across a

Delay tasks require that: 1. Animals discriminate among cues 2. Maintain memory across a delay 3. Evaluate choice phase and make correct decision

Brain areas involved in WM?

Brain areas involved in WM?

Today’s take-home message: Working memory is not simply short-term memory. It is an active

Today’s take-home message: Working memory is not simply short-term memory. It is an active process in which subjects must select and maintain information. It is under volitional control.

Two fundamental observations of behavior during a typical WM task (delayed match-to-sample) Time Correct

Two fundamental observations of behavior during a typical WM task (delayed match-to-sample) Time Correct choice Sample Delay Test 1. Performance increases with increases in sample 2. Performance decreases with increases in the delay (Much of this work has been conducted in pigeons)

Also: Match rule retained in reference memory. The copy/trace model was meant to highlight

Also: Match rule retained in reference memory. The copy/trace model was meant to highlight what WM is NOT.

Other observations of DMS performance: 1. Changing the illumination of the testing box during

Other observations of DMS performance: 1. Changing the illumination of the testing box during retention interval interferes w/ performance. (doesn't matter whether light->dark->light) This depends on degree of "surprise". It will habituate. Expected events have no effect on performance. 2. Surprising samples are more memorable. Suggests that animals actively process info about the SM during delay. When surprised, attentional resources drawn to event, less left for actively maintaining the sample. Another example: Directed Forgetting

Next: Neurophysiological evidence for WM as an active process

Next: Neurophysiological evidence for WM as an active process

Sample What-Then-Where Task What Delay Test Array Where Delay Choice 4 objects and 4

Sample What-Then-Where Task What Delay Test Array Where Delay Choice 4 objects and 4 locations were used

'What" Delay Activity in PF Cortex: Single Cell 'What' Delay 100 'Where' Delay 90

'What" Delay Activity in PF Cortex: Single Cell 'What' Delay 100 'Where' Delay 90 Spikes per second 80 Sample “A” 70 60 50 40 Sample “B” 30 20 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Time from sample onset (msec) a 40_1_01 2500

'What' and 'Where' Delay Activity: Single Cell 'Where' Delay Spikes per second 'What' Delay

'What' and 'Where' Delay Activity: Single Cell 'Where' Delay Spikes per second 'What' Delay 100 Sample A Down 80 60 40 Sample B 20 0 200 a 43_1_32 400 600 Up 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 2600 2800 Time from sample onset (msec)

A monkey test of attention

A monkey test of attention

Remember the identity and location of only the relevant obje Sample Delay Test stimuli

Remember the identity and location of only the relevant obje Sample Delay Test stimuli Array Trials Nonmatch Match Cue Trials 750 msec 1500 msec Bar release

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex “A” alone “B” alone 100 Spikes

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex “A” alone “B” alone 100 Spikes per second 50 Sample 0 0 Test 1000 2000 Time from sample onset (msec) 0 1000 2000 Time from sample onset

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex Attend “A” alone “B” alone 100

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex Attend “A” alone “B” alone 100 Spikes per second 50 Sample 0 0 Test 1000 2000 Time from sample onset (msec) 0 1000 2000 Time from sample onset

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex Attend “A” alone Attend “B” alone

Neural correlate of awareness in the prefrontal cortex Attend “A” alone Attend “B” alone 1000 2000 100 Spikes per second 50 Sample 0 0 Test 1000 2000 Time from sample onset (msec) 0 Time from sample onset

WM is not a passive copy of a sensory stimulus instead an active process

WM is not a passive copy of a sensory stimulus instead an active process So, in contrast to the copy/trace model, WM is: 1. Active - Ss actively select, encode and maintain, what is held in WM. 2. Not a simple match rule. Simple maintenance of record of sample then application of a matching rule. Rather something more complex is going on. One thing that may be happening is that instead of a matching rule, Ss develop an expectation, they anticipate what is going to happen and base their behavior on this expectation

What is info is maintained in the delay of WM tasks? Retrospective versus Prospective

What is info is maintained in the delay of WM tasks? Retrospective versus Prospective processing Time Correct choice Sample Delay Test

There is a considerable amount of evidence that animals tend to rely on a

There is a considerable amount of evidence that animals tend to rely on a prospective code for performance in delay tasks. In symbolic DMS, increasing the delay between sample and choice stimuli causes an increase confusions between similar choice stimuli, not similar samples. Fixation (2000 msec) Sample (500 msec) Delay (1000 msec) Test (500 msec) S 1 C 1 S 2 C 2 S 3 C 3

Delayed paired associate task Fixation (2000 msec) Sample (500 msec) Delay (1000 msec) Test

Delayed paired associate task Fixation (2000 msec) Sample (500 msec) Delay (1000 msec) Test (500 msec) S 1 C 1 S 2 C 2 S 3 C 3

Conclusions Working memory is an active process. It is under volitional control and can

Conclusions Working memory is an active process. It is under volitional control and can be contrasted with passive or automatic forms of memory. Working memory is prospective. It is geared toward the future, not merely a record of past events.