WIOA Youth Data Module 6 2019 WIOA National

WIOA Youth Data Module 6 2019 WIOA National Performance Training U. S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration

WIOA Youth Numbers Served ü National analysis by ISY and OSY ► Over 73% OSY in PY 2016; over 79% in PY 2017 ► Expenditures of OSY even higher, showing that OSY are a higher cost population to serve ü State by State analysis by ISY and OSY ► 7 States were 90% or higher for OSY in PY 2016; 10 states were 90% or higher in OSY for PY 2017 ► A few states have OSY percentages far lower than would be expected in comparison to expenditures 2

Total Participants Served National 160 000 151 774 148 801 All Youth 140 000 120 702 120 000 In-School Youth Out-of-School Youth 109 341 100 000 80 000 60 000 40 000 36 785 30 824 20 000 0 16 Q 4 (4 Q) 17 Q 4 (4 Q) Source: PY 2017 Q 4 Performance Individual Record Data 3

Total Percent Participants Served National 100% In-School Youth 90% Out-of-School Youth 79, 5% 80% 73, 5% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 24, 7% 20, 3% 20% 10% 0% PY 16 Q 4 PY 17 Q 4 Source: PY 2017 Q 4 Performance Individual Record Data 4

Total Percent Participants Served In-School Youth (By State) PY 2016 Q 4 PY 2017 Q 4 PR: N/A Source: PY 2017 Q 4 Performance Individual Record Data 5

Total Percent Participants Served Out-of-School Youth (By State) PY 2016 Q 4 PY 2017 Q 4 PR: N/A Source: PY 2017 Q 4 Performance Individual Record Data 6

OSY Expenditure Analysis ü Nationally 80. 8% in PY 2015, 85. 6% in PY 2016, and 84. 2% in PY 2017 (likely higher once 2 states correct reporting issues) ü Far exceeding 75% requirement since beginning of WIOA ü PY 2015: Every state except one exceeded the PY 2015 transition guidance of 50% and 10 percentage points higher than previous year ü PY 2016: 2 States below 75% so far (or below target expenditure rate if they have waiver or small state exception) ü PY 2017: Same 2 States below 75% so far (or below target expenditure rate if they have waiver or small state exception) 7

Work Experience Expenditure Analysis ü Nationally 20. 8% in PY 2015, 24. 4% in PY 2016, and 25. 5% in PY 2017 ü Exceeding 20% requirement since beginning of WIOA ü PY 2015: Many states did not reach 20%, likely due to a combination of new report form not ready, reporting issues, and transition to WIOA requirement ü PY 2016: 14 states below 20% so far (2 are likely reporting issues) ü PY 2017: 9 states below 20% so far (1 is likely a reporting issue) 8

Percent WIOA Youth Expenditures Out of School (OSY) and Work Experience (WEX) National) % OSY of Program Expenditures Work Experience % of Program Expenditures 100% 90% 86% 81% 84% 90% 85% 80% Threshold 75% 70% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 21% 20% 10% 0% 24% 26% PY 2016 PY 2017 23% 0% PY 2015 PY 2016 PY 2017 PY 2018 PY 2015 PY 2018 Source: PY Source: ETA 9130 B Financial Reports 9

Percent of WIOA Youth Expenditures – PY 2015 Out of School (OSY) and Work Experience (WEX) (by State) PY 2015 OSY PY 2015 WEX Source: ETA 9130 B Financial Reports 10

Percent of WIOA Youth Expenditures – PY 2016 Out of School (OSY) and Work Experience (WEX) (by State) PY 2016 OSY PY 2016 WEX Source: ETA 9130 B Financial Reports 11

Percent of WIOA Youth Expenditures – PY 2017 Out of School (OSY) and Work Experience (WEX) (by State) PY 2017 OSY PY 2017 WEX Source: ETA 9130 B Financial Reports 12

Percent of WIOA Youth Expenditures – PY 2018 Out of School (OSY) and Work Experience (WEX) (by State) PY 2018 OSY PY 2018 WEX N/A: D. C. Hawaii Idaho Maine N. Dakota S. Dakota Wyoming Amer. Samoa Virgin Islands Source: ETA 9130 B Financial Reports 13

ISY Additional Assistance Limitation Data ü WIOA Section 129 includes a limitation for ISY eligibility that not more than 5% can use the additional assistance barrier for purposes of ISY eligibility ü In PY 2017, 14 states were above the 5% limitation threshold and nationally the percentage of ISY that used additional assistance for eligibility was 6. 8%. ü In PY 2016, 20 states were above the 5% limitation threshold and nationally the percentage of ISY that used additional assistance for eligibility was 8. 3%. 14

Youth Additional Assistance (YAA) by State Percent YAA – In School Youth, No Other Barrier 65% 60% 55% 50% 45% 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% National [VALUE] Threshold [VALUE] 0% CT DC HI IA ME MN MT ND NE NH NM RI SD TX UT VA VI VT MI IN DE NC LA FL OR CO MS MD PA MO GA WA TN WI NY SC CA KS AR OH AL NJ IL MA WV WY OK NV AZ ID GU KY AK 5% Source: PY 2017 Q 4 Performance Individual Record Data 15

Any Questions? 16

Contact ETAPerforms@dol. gov 17

Please complete your session evaluations. 18