What should be discussed Results Framework and results

What should be discussed Results Framework and results tracker Variance Plan B

What should be discussed WP 1: What matooke delivered the NARITA? What matooke delivered the new 48 selected hybrids (this is not linked to amount of seeds and amount of hybrids) All PYT material from IITA and NARO should be evaluated in the same field

What should be discussed Reduce breeding blocks because: - Enough seeds - Enough hybrids Is there a need to use genetic relationships as part of the crossing schemes? Should EMBRAPA and IEB/IITA use the same SSR?

What should be discussed What can WP 2 -5 offer NOW to WP 1

What should be discussed WP 2: List of germplasm screened: - Different for each pest/disease - No link to breeding material - No link to segregation populations Mapping of pests/diseases: - Country - Testing sites - Breeding sites

What should be discussed Should we infect the 5 testing sites with everything?

What should be discussed WP 3: QTL analysis for BS? Genomic prediction: - Use average or individual info per genotype - What needs to be improved when we redo the work for plantain? - Are we using all criteria of the farmers? Plantain sequencing: what about EAHB?

What should be discussed WP 4 Start baby trials when mother trials are finished Will we process the new 48 hybrids in the same way as the current NARITAs? Any suggestions for the current breeding selection criteria?

What should be discussed WP 5: - BMOP Mislabbeling There is no IITA ontology=breeder’s ontology When do we start actually using it?