What is an earthquake z Shaking or vibration

What is an earthquake? z Shaking or vibration of the ground z rocks undergoing deformation break suddenly along a fault 1906 San Francisco earthquake

Oblique view of the San Andreas fault and San Francisco

Where are earthquakes found? z The Earth’s surface is composed of a number of mobile “tectonic plates” which are in constant motion z Most earthquakes are found at plate margins

Plate tectonics z The constant movement of the plates is referred to as plate tectonics z There are three main types of plate boundaries: y divergent y convergent y transform

Divergent margins z Here two tectonic plates are in the process of being created z Magma is injected into a crack, then cools and becomes new crust

An example of a wide, mature divergent margin z The middle of the Atlantic Ocean is a divergent margin which is being torn, or rifted, apart…the two plates are separating continuously at a rate of several cm/yr

An immature divergent plate margin z The Red Sea represents a young rift which is just beginning to separate Arabia from Africa… z Here, too, volcanism is evident, as a result of rifting

Volcanism in the Afar triangle z ‘Erta ‘Ale, a volcano slightly west of the Red Sea, represents the splitting apart and thinning of the African continent

Convergent margins I z Instead of two plates being created, they are being consumed… z Here an oceanic plate slides beneath a continental plate, since the former is denser z geologists refer to this process as subduction z Large, destructive earthquakes occur here

Convergent margins II z If two continental plates collide, they do not subduct, because they are too buoyant z Instead, intense compression with crustal shortening and thickening occur z Large, destructive earthquakes also are generated in this situation

Transform margins z The third type of plate margin is called a transform boundary z Here, plates are neither created nor destroyed… z they simply slide by one another

So here’s the big picture of what we’re living on

Where are the world’s earthquakes in terms of plate tectonics? z The great majority of earthquakes are located at plate margins z This where magmatism, friction, faulting, etc. , are most intense z Earthquakes in plate interiors are comparatively rare

The Pacific Rim of Fire z This notorious zone is characterized by subduction zones z Earthquakes and volcanoes here are particularly violent z friction from subduction produces large destructive quakes

North American seismic hazards

Canadian seismic hazards

Seismic hazard in eastern Canada

Faults associated with earthquakes z. Faults are planes of weakness along which the Earth has been broken z. Movements on a fault can be either slow (ductile deformation) or fast (brittle fracture) z. When a fault behaves in a brittle manner and breaks, earthquakes are generated

Three types of dominantly vertical faults z A normal fault is the result of tensional forces (e. g. , rifting) z Reverse and thrust faults are the result of horizontal compression

Faults whose movement is dominantly horizontal z These faults are termed strike-slip faults z They are a small-scale version of transform plate tectonic margins z They are termed leftlateral (sinistral) or right-lateral (dextral) according to their movement

Earthquake generation along a fault z The earthquake focus is its point of origin along a fault plane z Its epicenter is the vertical projection of the focus to the surface

Elastic rebound theory z Before fault rupture, rock deforms z after rupture, rocks return to their original shape… z. . . maybe z 1 Pallett 1 Creek shows similar slip amounts after different periods of time; possibly not resetting to zero? See Sieh and Levay, 1998, p. 90

Richter magnitudes z The Richter magnitude measures the maximum amplitude of ground shaking z It is a logarithmic scale z Globally, small earthquakes are more frequent than large: z ~800, 000/yr for events of magnitude 2. 0 -3. 4 z while an event of z 1 Richter unit magnitude 8 occurs difference is x 10 for once every 5 -10 years ground motion and x 33 for energy

Richter magnitudes

Destructiveness of an earthquake z. Earthquake magnitude z. Distance to epicenter z. Depth z. Strength of building z. Nature of soil or bedrock on which foundations are built z. Other local conditions

A challenge z. You yourself can calculate Richter magnitudes and epicenters from seismogram data. Go to: z http: //vcourseware. sonoma. edu/Virtual. Earthquake/ z Not only will you understand the science behind earthquake determinations, there also material rewards. . .

Diplomas !

The San Andreas fault z Along much of the west coast, the plate boundary is a transform margin

San Andreas fault z Although some people think San Francisco is “falling” into the Pacific Ocean, part of the city is actually already part of the Pacific plate z The San Andreas is a right-lateral strike-slip or transform fault

San Andreas fault

Right-lateral motion Photos from Shelton, 1966

Right-lateral motion Photo, diagram from Sieh and Le. Vay, 1998

Some history z The strike-slip nature of the San Andreas was not widely appreciated for up to 50 years after the 1906 San Francisco earthquake z Yet rocks on either side of the fault are different z The older the rocks, the greater the displacement z Eocene-age rocks (3758 Ma) show offsets up to 300 km

San Francisco, 18 April 1906 z. Magnitude 7. 8, epicenter near San Francisco z$ 400 million US in damage zthis is 1906 dollars; equivalent to hundreds of billions of dollars today z~700 people reported killed zthis is probably a 3 -4 times underestimate; thus 2, 000 -3, 000 dead, mostly in San Francisco

1906 - location and seismic trace Seismic trace of 1906 quake from a seismic station 15, 000 miles away in Gottingen, Germany

1906 - comparative magnitude z This event is northern California’s most powerful event in recorded history

1906 - extent and slip The northernmost 430 km of the San Andreas ruptured, with horizontal slippage up to 8 -9 meters

1906 - slip z This photograph shows a fence near Bolinas offset 2. 5 meters

1906 - intensity and shaking z. Maximum Mercalli values were VII to IX, which represent severe damage z. Shaking lasted 45 -60 seconds (for Loma Prieta 1989 and Northridge 1994, shaking lasted 5 -10 s) z. Shaking intensity correlated with geology, e. g. , bedrock vs. landfill

1906 - earthquake damage in San Francisco

1906 - earthquake damage in San Francisco

1906 - earthquake damage in San Francisco

1906 - some lessons learned z Big quakes can be followed by decades of seismic quiet z Quakes the size of the 1906 event appear to occur every several hundred (200? ) years

1906 - some lessons learned (ctd. ) z. In the short term, San Francisco and environs are most at risk from an event of magnitude 6 -7

1906 - some lessons not learned A topographic map of San Francisco from 1950. . . …and a 1980 version of the same map

Future quakes in the San Francisco Bay area Note the high probability of an earthquake of M > 6. 6 occurring before 2030 in this area

Cascadia z In the Pacific Northwest, the tectonic regime is subductionrelated, rather than transform as we have seen in California

Cascadia Here, there is evidence for very large earthquakes over the last several thousand years…the most recent is 300 years ago

Quebec z The St. Lawrence region has high levels of seismicity for a zone in the interior of a tectonic plate z This seismicity may be related to old, aborted rifts about 200 Ma ago Map from Lamontagne (1999)

Quebec - Montreal region z Ottawa River axis z more active Montreal. Maniwoki axis z M 5. 8, 1732, Montreal z M 6. 2, 1935, Temiscamingue z M 5. 6, 1944, Cornwall. Massena, NY

Quebec - Charlevoix region z Events: 1638; M 7 1663; M 6 1791; M 6. 5 1870; M 6. 2 1925 ($ 2 million in damage at the time) z fracturing and high pore fluid pressures z old rift faults serving as conduits for pressurized crustal fluids, which trigger quakes

Charlevoix also has evidence for a meteorite impact crater, which served to fragment and fracture rocks (from Lamontagne, 1999)

Effects of earthquakes: aftershocks z Aftershocks normally occur after a major earthquake z There may be many thousands of aftershock events over the space of months or even years z Although their magnitudes generally decrease with time, aftershocks have potential to cause significant damage to already weakened materials (e. g. , rocks, soils, buildings, power and gas lines)

Effects: liquefaction z Wet, unsolidated Liquefaction hazard in the San Francisco Bay area soils and sediments are highly vulnerable z Under shaking, the ground simply flows z Landfills, harbours, and the like are at risk

Effects: landslides z The ground vibrations and severe shaking associated with an earthquake can induce landslides in mountainous areas z This example in the Santa Susana Mtns. was caused by the 1994 Northridge event near Los Angeles

Effects: tsunamis z Tsunamis are ocean waves caused by displacements from earthquakes, landslides, etc. z They can be devastating at great distances from the epicenter Tsunami damage in Hilo, Hawaii, as a result of the 22 May 1960 Chile earthquake

Effects: building destruction z Buildings are damaged or destroyed by ground vibrations and shaking z The magnitude and duration of shaking are important factors in the extent of damage z Liquefaction and aftershocks increase the damage Building damage near the epicenter of the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake

Effects on building materials z. Masonry is not capable of withstanding significant bending stresses z. Wood is more resistant because it is more yielding z. But wood is vulnerable to fires. . .

Effects: fires z The ground shaking will rupture power and gas lines… z …and damage to water mains prevents or hinders fire fighting efforts z the photo shows a broken gas line from the 1994 Northridge earthquake

Devastating fires in San Francisco after the 1906 earthquake

Effects: personal loss z We are examining earthquakes from a scientific perspective… z …but we must not forget the human element and the pathos conveyed by this photograph from the 1994 Northridge earthquake

Mitigating earthquakes z Seismic hazard maps and risk maps help to properly site and construct buildings

Where to build your dream or trophy house - and where not to build z Avoid unstable soils and unconsolidated materials. . . z avoid mountainous terrain prone to landslides… z and above all, avoid active faults !

Appropriate building codes which can withstand earthquake damage z. Bedrock foundations best z. Avoid asymmetrical buildings z. Bolt house firmly to foundations z. Appliances firmly bolted down z. Gas lines flexible z. Cupboards, shelving attached to walls z. Heavy objects at low levels; anchor heavy furniture z. Beds away from windows to avoid broken glass

Warning and prediction z. Precursory seismicity z. Precursory deformation z. Changes in physical properties of rocks near a fault z. Changes in water levels, soil gases z. Unusual behaviour of animals

Earthquake prediction z Important concepts: z earthquake recurrence interval…seismic gap z role of paleoseismology z Yet our predictive ability is rudimentary, so we use probabilities z e. g. , 86% probability that a destructive quake of M>7 will hit southern California in the next 30 years (1994 estimate)

Earthquakes - reading z U. S. Geological Survey, 1999. Major quake likely to strike between 2000 and 2030. U. S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 152 -99, 4 pp. (http: //pubs. usgs. gov/fs/1999/fs 152 -99/) z Pelman, D. , 2000. Tiny movements ease fault risk in East Bay; pressure builds up less in northern Hayward segment. San Francisco Chronicle, 18 August 2000. (http: //www. sfgate. com/) z Eastern Canadian seismicity: y http: //earthquakescanada. nrcan. gc. ca/historic_eq/20 th/e_damaging_e. php

Earthquakes - web z. Canadian seismicity: yhttp: //www. pgc. nrcan. gc. ca z. US seismicity: yhttp: //earthquake. usgs. gov/ z. San Francisco Bay area: yhttp: //www. abag. ca. gov/bayarea/eqmaps