Welcome to Donau Chemie Pischelsdorf Plant Donau Chemie

  • Slides: 41
Download presentation
Welcome to Donau Chemie • Pischelsdorf Plant

Welcome to Donau Chemie • Pischelsdorf Plant

Donau Chemie Group • Active in the Austrian chemical production since 1828 • Operating

Donau Chemie Group • Active in the Austrian chemical production since 1828 • Operating in Europe, willing to install international subsidiaries • Since 1997 owned by Af. K • Organised in Business units • Medium sized

Declaration of fundamental Values • Sicherheit • Umwelt • Qualität • Security • Environment

Declaration of fundamental Values • Sicherheit • Umwelt • Qualität • Security • Environment • Quality

Business Units

Business Units

Positioned in central Europe

Positioned in central Europe

Pischelsdorf Plant • Operational since 1917: • Gunpowder • Sulfuric Acid • Refinery •

Pischelsdorf Plant • Operational since 1917: • Gunpowder • Sulfuric Acid • Refinery • Fertilizer • Supply of (industrial) customers in central Europe

Products of the Pischelsdorf Plant • Sulfuric Acid • Fertilizer - P, PK, NPK

Products of the Pischelsdorf Plant • Sulfuric Acid • Fertilizer - P, PK, NPK • Plaster and Plaster Boards • Reactivation of Loaded Carbon

Raw Materials • Sulfur • NPK-Components • Ammonia • Plaster • Acivated Carbon (loaded)

Raw Materials • Sulfur • NPK-Components • Ammonia • Plaster • Acivated Carbon (loaded) • Latex: • 1. 3 Butadiene

How we realize Security Safety concept Technical safety: • Risk analysis • Safety and

How we realize Security Safety concept Technical safety: • Risk analysis • Safety and risk evaluation (What-if-Analysis) • technical audits und checks, correctiv action plan Safety organisation: • Emergency plan, training plan • declaration of responsibilities (authorized people) • main training „good production practice“ • incident and accident information system

Security - Environment - Quality

Security - Environment - Quality

Seveso II - guidelines • Ammonia (CAS-Nr. 7664 -41 -7) R-Sätze: 10, 23 Max.

Seveso II - guidelines • Ammonia (CAS-Nr. 7664 -41 -7) R-Sätze: 10, 23 Max. storage capacity: 370 tons 3 storage tanks a 200. 000 Liter

AMMONIA • NH 3 - storage tank

AMMONIA • NH 3 - storage tank

Industrial fire brigade

Industrial fire brigade

A-TEAM Case Study Part 1: A multi-part course on generic hazardous substances management based

A-TEAM Case Study Part 1: A multi-part course on generic hazardous substances management based on material provided by the Lower-Austrian Fire Fighters Academy training program, with additional components on fire protection and fire fighting based on recently developed conventional training material by the authors (Roth, Hofbauer).

A-TEAM Case Study Part 2: A set of scenarios (Planspiele) combining background information and

A-TEAM Case Study Part 2: A set of scenarios (Planspiele) combining background information and simulated real-time events for team and leadership training (Einsatzleiter) on emergencies involving hazardous subances including one central, plant specific case based on the emergency plans and accident cases developed under the framework of the Seveso II Directive for the plant’s internal and external emergency plants.

A-TEAM Case Study Part 1: Duration of running one course in a small team

A-TEAM Case Study Part 1: Duration of running one course in a small team was 90 minutes including evaluation questions (considered too long by participants) Course will be split into 3 units. Evaluation: Paper based questionnaires; Built-in differential analysis of tests; Dynamic log files.

A-TEAM Case Study Trainee profiles: Semi-professional fire service within the plant: these are normal

A-TEAM Case Study Trainee profiles: Semi-professional fire service within the plant: these are normal employees with different tasks within the chemical plants operations, but with special training for the fire fighting and emergency response (training of the whole team: officers, soldiers, specialists) Similar structure in other DCAG plants: Opportunities for exploitation (re-use)

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation used also conventional paper-based questionnaires with a 1 -5 scale;

A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation used also conventional paper-based questionnaires with a 1 -5 scale; Design objective was to make filling the questionnaire within 5 minutes possible. Average grade was from 1. 3 (best case) to 2. 0 (worst case).

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study Comparing comprehensive test results BEFORE and AFTER the course: TIME: POINTS:

A-TEAM Case Study Comparing comprehensive test results BEFORE and AFTER the course: TIME: POINTS: 301 280 210 270

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study

A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation based on detailed log files

A-TEAM Case Study Evaluation based on detailed log files