WELCOME PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MEETING OSEP PROJECT DIRECTORS

WELCOME PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM MEETING @ OSEP PROJECT DIRECTORS’ VIRTUAL CONFERENCE APRIL 27, 2015

OSEP Investments Request 2 325 D 325 K Total FY 2013 $3. 57 M $10. 2 M $83. 7 million FY 2014 $4 M $11. 6 M $83. 7 million FY 2015 $3. 75 M $9. 75 M $83. 7 million FY 2016 ($4. 25 M) ($11 M) ($83. 7 million) Personnel Development Program

OSEP INVESTMENTS PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ALSO SUPPORTS - NEW Grants for Leadership Consortia in Sensory Disabilities and Disabilities Associated with Intensive Service Needs CENTERS CEEDAR Center Early Childhood Personnel Center IRIS Center on Great Teachers & Leaders 3

OSEP KEY RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM SUPPORTS - UPDATED G 5 System Grant Reporting - Forms, new Webinars Product Accessibility TA&D Network NEW Uniform Guidance – Technical Assistance for Grantees PDP Data Collection Center (DCC) 4

Personnel Development Program Performance Measures FY 2012 Data Collected & Reported in 2014 Published in 2015 Search on “Special Education Budget Justification FY 2016” for more information OSEP Project Directors’ Virtual Conference April 27, 2015

Performance Measure 1 Percentage of projects that incorporate evidence-based practices into their curricula

Performance Measure 2 7 Percentage of scholars completing OSEP- funded training programs who are knowledgeable and skilled in evidence based practices for infants, toddlers, children, and youth with disabilities. 90. 6 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 39. 1 2009 92. 9 87. 7 80. 2 40. 6 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Measure 2 for 2014 by Priority Area 8 93. 4 100 86. 9 73. 0 78. 2 82. 4 80 60 40 20 0 325 D 325 K - EC 325 K - LI 325 K - RS 325 K - MI

Performance Measure 3 9 Percentage of program scholars who exit preparation programs prior to completion due to poor academic performance

Performance Measures 4 and 5 10 Percentage of funded degree/certification program recipients who are working in the area(s) in which they were trained upon program completion and who are fully qualified under IDEA. Will report data for FY 2012 on these measures in late 2015.

Performance Measure 6 11 Percentage of degree/certification recipients who maintain employment for 3 or more years in the area(s) for which they were trained and who are fully qualified under IDEA. Discontinued reporting on this measure, as three new outcome measures and methodologies have been approved by OMB to be piloted beginning in 2015.

Performance Measure 7 12 The Federal cost per degree/certification program recipient who completed the program. 24, 197 27, 398 32, 822 30, 256 22, 333 35, 000 21, 944 30, 000 25, 000 20, 000 15, 000 10, 000 5, 000 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Three New Outcome Measures 13 Measure 1: The number and percentage of degree/certification recipients who are employed in highneed districts. Measure 2: The number and percentage of degree/certification recipients who are employed in the field of special education for at least two years. Measure 3: The number and percentage of degree/certification recipients who are rated as effective by their employers.

Summary of Results 14 Of the four PDP measures reported on this year, program grantee data showed increased performance on two measures, and showed decreased performance on two measures (EBP in the curriculum, and an assessment of knowledge and skills attained in the program). Only one of four PDP measures reported on this year is on or above target for the measure. The remaining three measures reported this year were all below expected performance.

Live Discussion of Video 16 Leveraging Technology to Support Instructional Practice and Professional Development, and Build Micro Credentials v With Lisa Dieker and Sarah Allen

Office of Education Technology 17 Future Ready Schools: Building Technology Infrastructure for Learning (November 2014) Future Ready Schools: Professional Learning Toolkit (November 2014)

Considerations for Personnel Preparation Programs 18 What do scholars need to learn to be prepared for practice from the time they enter the school building? What are you doing to address this priority area in your personnel preparation program? How could personnel preparation be enhanced to ensure program graduates will be effective in supporting practice aligned with the priority area? What could we do together to support this priority area?

For additional information - Thanks for participating!