Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching Recap Lensing useful

  • Slides: 49
Download presentation
Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching

Weak Lensing 2 Tom Kitching

Recap • Lensing useful for • Dark energy • Dark Matter • Lots of

Recap • Lensing useful for • Dark energy • Dark Matter • Lots of surveys covering 100’s or 1000’s of square degrees coming online now

Recap • Lensing equation • Local conformal mapping • General Relativity relates this to

Recap • Lensing equation • Local conformal mapping • General Relativity relates this to the gravitational potential • Distortion matrix implies that distortion is elliptical : shear and convergence • Simple formalise that relates the shear and convergence (observable) to the underlying gravitational potential

Part III : Measuring Lensing • Measuring Moments • Model Fitting • PSF modelling

Part III : Measuring Lensing • Measuring Moments • Model Fitting • PSF modelling

Typical galaxy used for cosmic shear analysis Typical star Used for finding Convolution kernel

Typical galaxy used for cosmic shear analysis Typical star Used for finding Convolution kernel

Cosmic Lensing gi~0. 2 Real data: gi~0. 03 7/19

Cosmic Lensing gi~0. 2 Real data: gi~0. 03 7/19

Atmosphere and Telescope Convolution with kernel Real data: Kernel size ~ Galaxy size 8/19

Atmosphere and Telescope Convolution with kernel Real data: Kernel size ~ Galaxy size 8/19

Pixelisation Sum light in each square Real data: Pixel size ~ Kernel size /2

Pixelisation Sum light in each square Real data: Pixel size ~ Kernel size /2 9/19

Noise Mostly Poisson. Some Gaussian and bad pixels. Uncertainty on total light ~ 5

Noise Mostly Poisson. Some Gaussian and bad pixels. Uncertainty on total light ~ 5 per cent 10/19

Need to measure shear to 10 -3

Need to measure shear to 10 -3

Intrinsic Ellipticity • Have introduced here the notion that the sources themselves are already

Intrinsic Ellipticity • Have introduced here the notion that the sources themselves are already elliptical g 1 g 2

Quadrupole Moments • Most common implementation called KSB • Unwieghted quadrupole moments • Sum

Quadrupole Moments • Most common implementation called KSB • Unwieghted quadrupole moments • Sum over all pixels and find the 2 nd moments

Moments • In the same way as the derivation of the shear have a

Moments • In the same way as the derivation of the shear have a traceless part of the matrix • Define a source ellipticity such that

Moments • Want the lensed ellipticity • Rotation of the unlensed quadrupoles (exercise to

Moments • Want the lensed ellipticity • Rotation of the unlensed quadrupoles (exercise to show this)

 • Schneider & Seitz (1995) • Allows the observed ellipticity to be related

• Schneider & Seitz (1995) • Allows the observed ellipticity to be related to the unlensed ellipticity and shear • Reduced shear g= /(1 - )

 • Also Bonnet & Mellier (1995) • Different normalisation of the moments

• Also Bonnet & Mellier (1995) • Different normalisation of the moments

Moments • The weak lensing limit • g<<1

Moments • The weak lensing limit • g<<1

The Weak Lensing Assumption • When we average over (enough) galaxies in the universe

The Weak Lensing Assumption • When we average over (enough) galaxies in the universe the intrinsic ellipticity is randomly orientated such that

Moments • Taking into account the PSF • Additional Quadrupole • For practical implementation

Moments • Taking into account the PSF • Additional Quadrupole • For practical implementation (KSB, 95)

Model Fitting • Idea of model fitting • Instead of measuring a quantity from

Model Fitting • Idea of model fitting • Instead of measuring a quantity from the data we can fit a model to the data • The model can contain elements that • Model the galaxy (intrinsic shape) • Model the PSF • The model can be convolved with the PSF • Bayesian • Prior elliticity distribution

Model Fitting • Minimum set of parameters we need are • e 1, e

Model Fitting • Minimum set of parameters we need are • e 1, e 2, position (x, y), brightness, size e 2 e 1 |e|=1

Model Fitting • Bayesian Model Fitting • Prior in this case is the probability

Model Fitting • Bayesian Model Fitting • Prior in this case is the probability distribution of the intrinsic ellipticity distribution • Can iteratively extract this from the data by summation of the posteriors

Model Fitting • How to estimate ellipticity and shear using model fitting • We

Model Fitting • How to estimate ellipticity and shear using model fitting • We know (from quadrupoles) that in the weak lensing limit • For probability (model fitting) this is the expectation value

Model Fitting • Need prior to correctly weight ellipticity • However the ellipticity prior

Model Fitting • Need prior to correctly weight ellipticity • However the ellipticity prior can bias individual shear values if they are low signal-to-noise • But a Bayesian method can exactly account for this • Other terms <<1 • Define shear sensitivity

Model Fitting • Accounting for this effect (noise bias) • Can add extra weight

Model Fitting • Accounting for this effect (noise bias) • Can add extra weight if needed

Model Fitting • Lensfit • Miller et al. (07) • Kitching et al. (08)

Model Fitting • Lensfit • Miller et al. (07) • Kitching et al. (08) • Bayesian Model fitting • Uses emperical models (bulge+disk) • Analytically marginalises over brightness and galaxy position • Best performing shape measurement method to date (used on PS 1, CFHTLen. S)

Model Fitting • Shapelets • Complex model based on a QM formalism • Similar

Model Fitting • Shapelets • Complex model based on a QM formalism • Similar to raising lowering operators (see L 1) • Noisy on real data • Not regularised

PSF Modelling • For model fitting methods need to model the PSF as well

PSF Modelling • For model fitting methods need to model the PSF as well

PSF Modelling • Two main ways of PSF modelling • 1) Direct : Model

PSF Modelling • Two main ways of PSF modelling • 1) Direct : Model the PSF in each exposure using a fitted model to either pixel intensity, ellipticity, size of stars • 2) Indirect : Use multiple exposures to extract the model from the data -- a PCA-like approach • Also deconvolution : remove the PSF from the data by deconvolving the data

Part IV : Lensing Simulations • Shear Testing Programme • GRavitational l. Ensing Accuracy

Part IV : Lensing Simulations • Shear Testing Programme • GRavitational l. Ensing Accuracy Testing

 • Lots of shape measurement codes and approaches • • • KSB Lensfit

• Lots of shape measurement codes and approaches • • • KSB Lensfit Shapelets DIEMOS Seclets Sersiclets HOLICS Sextractor … • We don’t know the true shear (no “spectra”) • So need simulations

STEP : Shear Testing Programme • • •

STEP : Shear Testing Programme • • •

Heymans et al. , 2006; Massey et al. , 2007 & Kitching et al.

Heymans et al. , 2006; Massey et al. , 2007 & Kitching et al. , 2008 KSB

Quality Factor Kitching et al. , 2008 (form filling functions); Amara & Refregier (2007)

Quality Factor Kitching et al. , 2008 (form filling functions); Amara & Refregier (2007)

7 non-lensing participants Q~1000 in some regimes

7 non-lensing participants Q~1000 in some regimes

GREAT 08 : Stacking Procedure is Important Average Data Individual Object Statistic Ensemble Statistic

GREAT 08 : Stacking Procedure is Important Average Data Individual Object Statistic Ensemble Statistic Average Estimators Winning Methods (Q=1000) Stacked the Data

STEP 2006 2008 2010

STEP 2006 2008 2010

Massey et al. 2008 Fu et al. 2008

Massey et al. 2008 Fu et al. 2008

http: //www. great 10 challenge. info

http: //www. great 10 challenge. info

Recap • Observed galaxies have instrinsic ellipticity and shear • Reviewed shape measurement methods

Recap • Observed galaxies have instrinsic ellipticity and shear • Reviewed shape measurement methods • Moments - KSB • Model fitting - lensfit • Still an unsolved problem for largest most ambitous surveys • Simulations • STEP 1, 2 • GREAT 08 • Currently LIVE(!) GREAT 10

Next Lecture Cosmic Shear : the Statistics of Weak Lensing

Next Lecture Cosmic Shear : the Statistics of Weak Lensing