Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Kern

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Kern Fan Groundwater Storage Project nt- Ke Ca na na Ca rn Applicant: Irvine Ranch Water District/ Rosedale Rio-Bravo Water Storage District do y. C l 65 l wa r Le Fria Ca llo an al 43 99 Oildale 58 Bakersfield 58 Project Location 5 East Si Main Canal lifo rnia Aq ue Kern Island Canal iver n. R Ker l de Cana Ca Pioneer Canal MAP togo here na ta du ct a en Ca l Vis al an t. C tle Ou Bu Maple Canal 0 2. 5 5 Miles 10 anal ers C Bu en Re a Vis cre atio ta Aq nal uati Are c a Farm Stin e. C ana l 119 223 Project Type: Groundwater Storage Funding Request: $85, 700, 000 Total Capital Costs: $171, 300, 000 Proposed Project Benefits: Ecosystem • Spring & Winter-Run Chinook Survival • Incidental Wetland Habitat Emergency Response • Drought Water Supply • Delta Failure

Kern Fan Summary of Remaining Benefit Issues Monetization of Public Benefits $ millions Benefits Staff Conclusion Ecosystem Spring- & Winter-Run Chinook Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation Appealed monetary value reduced $30. 8 $14. 3 Ecosystem Incidental Wetland Habitat Appealed monetary value reduced $98. 2 $39. 8 Emergency Response Drought Water Supply Appealed monetary value reduced. Calculations explained at April meeting, value increased. $18. 6 $3. 3 $10. 7 Emergency Response Delta Failure Appealed monetary value reduced $28. 5 $15. 1 Water Storage Investment Program

Kern Fan Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • Pulse flows and water options • Incidental wetland habitat Water Storage Investment Program

Kern Fan Public Benefit Ratio Related Information Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits $72. 5 $79. 9 Applicant Funding Request $85. 7 PBR = $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program 0. 85 0. 93 Value of Ecosystem Benefits $72. 5 $79. 9 Total Capital Costs $171. 3 Maximum Eligible Amount $72. 5 $79. 9

Kern Fan CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Spring- & Winter-Run Chinook Survival $30. 8 $14. 3 Ecosystem – Incidental Wetland Habitat $98. 2 $39. 8 Emergency Response – Drought Water Supply $18. 6 $10. 7 Emergency Response – Delta Failure $28. 5 $15. 1 $176. 1 $79. 9 Total Value Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Chino Basin Conjunctive Use Environmental Water Storage/Exchange Program Applicant: Inland Empire Utilities Agency Project Type: Conjunctive Use 30 Rancho Cucamonga 66 Upland Pomona 57 L O E S S A N S A G E I N N B L O E R N A R D Puddingstone Reservoir 10 Ontario Total Capital Costs: $372, 000 60 Chino A N O B R E A R N N G A E R D IN O S A N 71 S MAP togo here 83 Los Serranos 142 Project Location Mira Loma O I N D A R E RN I D B E RS VE I R r ive a. R An ta n Sa 15 Norco 91 Miles 0 1. 5 3 6 Corona Funding Request: $372, 000 Proposed Project Benefits: Ecosystem • Increased Juvenile Chinook Emigration Water Quality • Groundwater Protection Emergency Response

Chino Basin Summary of Remaining Issues Monetization of Public Benefits $ in millions Benefits Staff Conclusion Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation Ecosystem Increased Emigration of Juvenile Chinook Appealed monetary value reduced $215. 8 $76. 9 Water Quality Protection of Groundwater Appealed monetary value reduced $268. 2 $225. 9 Water Storage Investment Program

Chino Basin Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • Feasibility and cost of water transfers for alternative cost Water Storage Investment Program

Chino Basin Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits $341. 4 Applicant Funding Request $372. 0 PBR = 0. 92 $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program Related Information Value of Ecosystem Benefits $76. 9 Total Capital Costs $372. 0 Maximum Eligible Amount $153. 7

Chino Basin CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Juvenile Chinook $215. 8 $76. 9 Water Quality – Groundwater Protection $268. 2 $225. 9 Emergency Response $38. 7 Total Value $522. 6 $341. 4 Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Pure Water San Diego Program Applicant: City of San Diego— Public Utilities Department 5 Project Type: Surface Storage Ecosystem • Reduced Solids Discharge • Increased Delta Outflow • Ecosystem Improvements Funding Request: $219, 300, 000 Water Quality • Reduced Salinity Load • Reduced Delta Exports 805 San Project Location go Die Aq 52 ct du ue La Jolla Proposed Project Benefits: 274 MAP togo here Total Capital Costs: $1, 151, 100, 000 15 163 8 River San Diego Recreation 5 94 209 San Diego Miles 0 1. 5 3 6 Emergency Response • Drought Emergency Water Supply

Pure Water Summary of Remaining Benefit Issues Benefits Staff Conclusion Monetization of Public Benefits $ in millions Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation Ecosystem Reduced Solids Discharge Appealed monetary value reduced $287. 8 $9. 1 Ecosystem Increased Delta Outflow Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $13. 1 $0 Ecosystem Improvements Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $104. 9 $0 Water Quality Reduced Salinity Load Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $43. 5 $0 Water Quality Reduced Delta Exports Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $12. 3 $0 Emergency Response Drought Emergency Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $19. 3 $0 Water Storage Investment Program

Pure Water Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • Monetizing reduced total suspended solids benefit (reduced PLWTP discharge) Water Storage Investment Program

Pure Water Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits $10. 9 Applicant Funding Request $219. 3 PBR = 0. 05 $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program Related Information Value of Ecosystem Benefits $9. 1 Total Capital Costs $1, 151. 1 Maximum Eligible Amount $0. 0

Pure Water CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Reduced Solids $287. 8 $9. 1 Ecosystem – Increased Delta Outflow $13. 1 $0. 0 Ecosystem – Ecosystem Improvements $104. 9 $0. 0 Water Quality – Reduced Salinity Load $43. 5 $0. 0 Water Quality – Reduced Delta Exports $12. 3 $0. 0 Emergency Response – Drought Emergency $19. 3 $0. 0 Recreation $1. 8 Total Value $482. 6 $0. 0 Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Temperance Flat Reservoir Project Kerckhoff Lake Hensley Lake Project Type: CALFED Surface Storage M ad er an al 145 Millerton Lake Project Location D S A E M A O F Madera Funding Request: $1, 055, 300, 000 N E R Friant Dam R r ve Ri no es Fr a. C MAP togo here Total Capital Costs: $2, 644, 100, 000 41 En ter pr ise Ca 168 na San Joaquin River l Fria ntrn Ke 99 Ca Herndon Canal na Clovis l Mill Ditch Fresno Can al Fresno 180 an 0 2. 5 5 Miles 10 k. C y Dr ee Cr 180 al Applicant: San Joaquin Valley Water Infrastructure Authority al an h. C 41 c wit F le ow r. S r ive s. R ng Ki Proposed Project Benefits: Ecosystem • Spring-Run Chinook Fishery Improvement • Refuge Water Supply Flood Control Emergency Response Recreation

Temperance Flat Summary Remaining Benefit Issues Benefits Staff Conclusion Ecosystem Spring-run Chinook Monetization of Public Benefits $ in millions Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $2, 229. 8 $0 Ecosystem Refuge Water Appealed monetary value reduced $82. 8 $85. 7 Flood Control Appealed monetary value reduced $104. 7 $104. 3 Recreation Appealed physical benefit removed therefore monetary value removed $203. 1 $0 Water Storage Investment Program

Temperance Flat Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Source: Fisheries Management Plan: A Framework for Adaptive Management in the San Joaquin River Restoration Program, 2010

1. 4. 1 Primary and Extended Project Areas For Temperance Flat Reservoir (TFR) The Primary TFR Project Area shown in Figure 1 -2 encompasses the following: • San Joaquin River upstream from Friant Dam (about 20 miles northeast of Fresno) to Kerckhoff Dam, including Millerton Lake and the area that would be inundated by the proposed Temperance Flat RM 274 Reservoir; and • Areas that could be directly affected by construction-related activities, including the footprint of proposed temporary and permanent facilities for the TFR Project upstream from Friant Dam. The Extended TFR Project Area, as shown in Figure 1 -3, encompasses the following: • San Joaquin River downstream from Friant Dam, including the Restoration Area (Friant Dam to Merced River confluence), the lower San Joaquin River, and the Delta; • Lands served by San Joaquin River water rights, including underlying groundwater basins; • Friant Division of the CVP, including underlying groundwater basins; • Areas represented by the SLDMWA, including the San Luis Unit, San Felipe Division, and Delta Division of the CVP, including underlying groundwater basins; and • South-of-Delta (SOD) water service areas of the SWP, including underlying groundwater basins

Economic Review • Monetizing spring-run Chinook salmon benefit Water Storage Investment Program

Temperance Flat Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits $400. 7 Applicant Funding Request $2, 229. 8 PBR = 0. 38 $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program Related Information Value of Ecosystem Benefits $85. 7 Total Capital Costs $2, 644. 1 Maximum Eligible Amount $171. 3

Temperance Flat CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Chinook Salmon $2, 229. 8 $0. 0 Ecosystem – Refuge Water $82. 8 $85. 7 Flood Control $104. 7 $104. 3 Emergency Response $210. 7 Recreation $203. 1 $0. 0 Total Value $2, 831. 1 $400. 7 Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Willow Springs Water Bank Conjunctive Use Project Applicant: Southern California Water Bank Authority ct uedu Los Aq eles Ang Project Type: Conjunctive Use KERN Ca lifo rnia Aqu edu L O S A N G E L E S ct Project Location Piute Ponds 138 Funding Request: $301, 600, 000 14 FFaarimmoonnt RReesseervvoori Creek Castaic MAP togo here E lizabeth LLaakkee Lancaster Total Capital Costs: $305, 800, 000 Ca lifo rn ia A que duc t Palmdale BBoouuqquueet RReesseervvoori Aq ue dduuc t Castaic Lake Lo s. A ng ele s 5 Lake Palmdale 14 0 2. 5 5 Miles 10 er Riv lara ta C San 138 Proposed Project Benefits: Ecosystem • Increased Juvenile Chinook Emigration Emergency Response

Willow Springs Summary of Remaining Benefit Issues Monetization of Public Benefits $ millions Benefits Ecosystem Increased Emigration of Juvenile Chinook Water Storage Investment Program Staff Conclusion Appealed monetary value reduced Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation $371. 8 $61. 1

Willow Springs Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • Feasibility and cost of water transfers for alternative cost Water Storage Investment Program

Willow Springs Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits $105. 3 Applicant Funding Request $301. 6 PBR = 0. 35 $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program Related Information Value of Ecosystem Benefits $61. 1 Total Capital Costs $305. 8 Maximum Eligible Amount $105. 3

Willow Springs CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Juvenile Chinook $371. 8 $61. 1 Emergency Response $44. 1 $44. 2 Total Value $415. 9 $105. 3 Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Project A D L E S C I R N E A M T S Cre ek Pacheco Lake Lla ga s l Coyote Lake 5 e Cana rk P ach ec o 152 O'Neill Forebay San Luis Reservoir Cr ee k Project Location Gilroy Pa jaro Riv er MAP togo here is Holl N s. B an rk Los Ba South Fo duit Con k nos Cree San Benito River 156 Hollister 25 2. 5 5 Miles 10 os Cr ee k B E NI T O ter 25 129 0 Lo SANTACLARA SA 101 Outsid North Fo Cre ek M ER SA CE N D B EN I T O nal Main Ca Coyot e 33 t U S duc que ia A C L A R A l ota Cana forn Cali nd Delta-Me S A N TA Applicant: Santa Clara Valley. Water District Project Type: Surface Storage Funding Request: $484, 500, 000 Total Capital Costs: $969, 000 Proposed Project Benefits: Ecosystem • Steelhead Habitat • Refuge Supply Emergency Response • Delta Failure

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Summary of Remaining Issues Monetization of Public Benefits $ in millions Benefits Staff Conclusion Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation Ecosystem Refuge Supply Appealed monetary value increased $4. 0 $5. 0 Emergency Response Delta Failure Appealed monetary value decreased $1, 827. 0 $137. 9 Water Storage Investment Program

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • State investment for steelhead trout • Delta outage emergency response Water Storage Investment Program

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion Public Benefit Ratio Related Information Value of Public Benefits $858. 8 Value of Ecosystem Benefits $721. 0 Applicant Funding Request $484. 5 Total Capital Costs $969. 0 PBR = 1. 77 $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program Maximum Eligible Amount $484. 5

Pacheco Reservoir Expansion CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Steelhead Habitat $716. 0 Ecosystem – Refuge Supply $4. 0 $5. 0 Emergency Response – Delta Failure $1, 827. 0 $137. 9 Total Value $2, 547. 0 $858. 8 Water Storage Investment Program

Water Storage Investment Program California WATER COMMISSION South Sacramento County Agriculture & Habitat Lands Recycled Water, Groundwater Storage, and Conjunctive Use Program La gu na Cr Applicant: Sacramento Regional County Sanitation District ee k Funding Request: $280, 500, 000 Ecosystem • Fall-run Chinook Flows • Wetland Habitat • Riparian Habitat • Greater Sandhill Crane Habitat • Vernal Pool Habitat Total Capital Costs: $280, 500, 000 Water Quality • Reduced Salinity Load De er C ree k Elk Grove 99 C A O S T Stone Lake 160 Project Location Co su mn es Riv er 5 R O Y A O M L E N 84 MAP togo here to en am cr Sa r ve Ri Mokelum ne Rive r Walnut Grove Dry Creek S A C R A M E N T O Miles 1. 5 3 Project Type: Conjunctive Use Recreation 220 0 Proposed Project Benefits: 6 S A N J O A Q U I N

South County Ag Summary of Remaining Benefits Issues Monetization of Public Benefits $ millions Benefits Staff Conclusion Ecosystem Fall-run Chinook February value was conditioned; conditions not met. Value decreased. April $63. 9 meeting clarification resulted in increase. $42. 2 $45. 5 Ecosystem Wetland Habitat Appealed monetary value decreased $78. 4 $65. 3 Ecosystem Riparian Habitat Appealed monetary value decreased $23. 3 $21. 7 Water Storage Investment Program Applicant Appeal Staff Recommendation

South County Ag Reviewer Discussion Water Storage Investment Program

Economic Review • Present value of fall-run Chinook salmon benefit • Wetland acres monetized Water Storage Investment Program

South County Ag Public Benefit Ratio Value of Public Benefits Related Information $244. 3 $247. 6 Applicant Funding Request $280. 5 PBR = $ in millions Water Storage Investment Program 0. 87 0. 88 Value of Ecosystem Benefits $196. 6 $200. 0 Total Capital Costs $280. 5 Maximum Eligible Amount $244. 3 $247. 6

South County Ag CWC Decision Items Value of Public Benefits Physical Benefit Appeal Recommended Value $ in millions Ecosystem – Fall-run Chinook Flows $63. 9 $45. 5 Ecosystem – Wetlands Habitat $78. 4 $65. 3 Ecosystem – Riparian Habitat $23. 3 $21. 7 Ecosystem – Sandhill Crane Habitat $57. 0 Ecosystem – Vernal Pool Habitat $10. 5 Water Quality – Reduced Salinity $47. 7 Total Value $280. 6 $247. 6 Water Storage Investment Program