Water Jug Shoe EDSGN 100 Section 014 Team
- Slides: 14
Water Jug Shoe EDSGN 100 Section 014 Team 5 Pete Mele, Jared Rose, Jeremy Dunston, Christian Craig, Joey Castelli October 19, 2017
Table of Contents ● ● ● Design Task Design Process Evaluation Analysis Prototype Conclusion
Design Task ● Successfully design a device that allows the customer to walk on water with a cost efficient, easily transported product. ● The stakeholders rated the importance of the cost, durability, portability, safety, ease of use, and aesthetics of the product. Based on the stakeholder needs, we identified the necessity for the product to be reasonably priced, stable in water, easily transportable, and durable.
Based on the criteria set out by the pairwise comparison, we designed 5 potential prototypes.
We evaluated each idea using a design matrix to determine which prototype satisfied the criteria best.
Engineering Analysis Cost Analysis
Calculations ● 1 gal = 8 lbs ● 1 gal = 231 in^3 ● ● ● 170 lbs/8 lbs = 21. 25 gal*231 in^3 = 4908. 75 in^3 Surface area = 4*(14. 8 in*19 in) = 1124. 8 in^2 4908. 75 in^3/1124. 8 in^2 = 4. 36 in below water 6. 3 in-4. 36 in = 1. 94 in above water
Prototype
Results of Prototype
Adjusted Prototype
System and Subsystem
Summary After testing our design for the first time, we found out we needed more stability and to fix this issue we reinforced our device with iced tea jugs. As a result, it still lacked stability even with the poles we attached. Our failure was a matter of insufficient stability.
Gantt Chart
Questions?
