Water and Land Use The Efficiency Connection Mary

  • Slides: 18
Download presentation
Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban

Water and Land Use: The Efficiency Connection Mary Ann Dickinson Executive Director California Urban Water Conservation Council

 Water Resources in the USA Total Withdrawals

Water Resources in the USA Total Withdrawals

Infrastructure Costs WA ND MT MN 8 ME NH SD OR 10 ID MI

Infrastructure Costs WA ND MT MN 8 ME NH SD OR 10 ID MI NV UT CO 7 5 3 OH IN OK LA GA AL 10 HI DE MD SC $Billions 4 FL 9 RI NC TX GU CT VA TN AR MS 6 AK PA WV KY NM MA NJ MO CA AZ 2 NY IA IL KS 1 VT WY NE 9 WI < $10 - $20 - $30 - $40 - $50 > $50 20 Year Drinking Water and Clean Water Infrastructure Needs by EPA Region

Effects of Growth Water Resources and Population Growth, 2000 -2020 Source: DOE/NETL (M. Chan,

Effects of Growth Water Resources and Population Growth, 2000 -2020 Source: DOE/NETL (M. Chan, July 2002)

600, 000 people and over 200, 000 homes per year

600, 000 people and over 200, 000 homes per year

Residential Water Usage Source: AWWRF Residential End Uses of Water, 1999

Residential Water Usage Source: AWWRF Residential End Uses of Water, 1999

AB 2717 • Became law September, 2004 • CUWCC formed Landscape Task Force to

AB 2717 • Became law September, 2004 • CUWCC formed Landscape Task Force to review landscape water issues, make recommendations for improvements • Representatives from water suppliers, landscape & building industries, cities & counties, environmental groups, and state & federal agencies

We Finished It! • 43 recommendations • 76 specific actions to implement the recommendations

We Finished It! • 43 recommendations • 76 specific actions to implement the recommendations • Top 12 • AB 1881 submitted

New Technology Programs Et Weather Data For Irrigation Scheduling

New Technology Programs Et Weather Data For Irrigation Scheduling

The Study Area

The Study Area

Study Objectives • Characterize Runoff Quantity and Water Quality – Dry Weather – Storm

Study Objectives • Characterize Runoff Quantity and Water Quality – Dry Weather – Storm Conditions • Evaluate Methods of Reducing Runoff

Study Design Control Neighborhood #1 Control Neighborhood #2 Education Neighborhood Control Neighborhood #3 Retrofit

Study Design Control Neighborhood #1 Control Neighborhood #2 Education Neighborhood Control Neighborhood #3 Retrofit and Education Neighborhood Flows to San Diego Creek and Newport Bay = Water quality and flow monitoring locations

Study Findings • 41. 2 gpd saved annual average with ET controllers and education

Study Findings • 41. 2 gpd saved annual average with ET controllers and education • 25. 6 gpd saved with education • 64 -71% runoff flow reduction in combined area • 79% runoff reduction in one specific neighborhood

Study Implications • Landscape water not just a drought issue or even a peaking

Study Implications • Landscape water not just a drought issue or even a peaking issue • Multiple environmental benefits of regional and statewide significance • An important partner in basin management: Runoff reduction, pollutant reduction, reduced wastewater treatment, reduced green waste management

Green Building Issues • LEED (USGBC) only awards 6 points for water efficiency •

Green Building Issues • LEED (USGBC) only awards 6 points for water efficiency • LEED Water Efficiency Technical Advisory Group working to make significant improvements (Council participation) • Other green building initiatives similarly weak on water efficiency • “California Friendly” and “Smart from the Start” pilot programs in California

California Friendly “ Active Family”

California Friendly “ Active Family”