Visual Summary 1846 Wilmot Proviso 1854 KansasNebraska Act

Visual Summary 1846 Wilmot Proviso 1854 Kansas–Nebraska Act 1856 Caning of Sumner 1859 Attack on Harpers Ferry SECESSION Compromise of 1850 1855 “Bleeding Kansas” 1857 Dred Scott v. Sanford Election of 1860 Back to Transparencies

BACK TO LESSON Free and Slave States Territories, 1820– 1854 Back to Maps

Main Idea Disagreements between the North and the South, especially over the issue of slavery, led to political conflict. Why It Matters Now Regional differences can make national problems difficult to resolve.

What were the effects of abolitionism, the Wilmot Proviso, and California’s application for statehood? CAUSES EFFECTS Abolitionism Raised tensions among citizens over the morality of slavery Wilmot Proviso Caused political conflict over the legality of slavery in the territories California’s application for statehood Led to the Compromise of 1850

• What were two ways that the North and the South differed by the mid-1800 s? • In what ways was racism common in both the North and the South? • How did the War with Mexico lead to conflict between the North and the South?

North begins to rely on industry and commerce and the South starts to rely on plantations and agriculture North - Industry South- Agriculture

Major export of the South is cotton Cotton plant South invests in slave labor, not industry

most Southerners do not own slaves and resent the rich slave owners

many Northern workers and immigrants opposed slavery because it took away jobs and was an economic threat to them

many in the North who considered themselves abolitionists were still racists RACIST – having prejudice based on race

Slave owners defended the owning of slaves by saying they were actually helping the African Americans by giving them shelter, food and religion

WILMOT PROVISO – a bill to outlaw any slavery in land obtained from the war with Mexico

It passed in the House of Representatives but not the Senate Created a new political party called the FREE SOIL PARTY

California wants to enter as a free state – this would upset the balance of power between free and slave FREE STATES SLAVE STATES

COMPROMISE OF 1850 – a plan offered by Henry Clay, a senator from Kentucky Henry Clay

Compromise of 1850: 1)California enters as a free state and slave trade is abolished in Washington D. C. = FREE

Compromise of 1850: 2) Congress agrees to not pass any laws about banning slavery in areas received in the Mexican War and pass tougher fugitive slaves laws

SLAVERY IN 1860 http: //civilwar. gatech. edu/histgis/image 2 a. jpg

STEPHEN A. DOUGLAS – Senator from Illinois, was in charge of passing the Compromise of 1850 Stephen A Douglas

COMPROMISE OF 1850 – a temporary solution to the free state / slave state debate as the nation grew