Visual Field Digest Teaching Kit Chapter 11 HAAGSTREIT

Visual Field Digest Teaching Kit Chapter 11 HAAG-STREIT AG

Teaching Kit Copyright § The Visual Field Digest Teaching Kit includes all figures and illustrations from the Visual Field Digest. They can be used for non-commercial presentations free of charge. § Haag-Streit AG allows the use of this figures for personal or academic use under the conditions that § (i) it is used without commercial purpose and § (ii) the content is reproduced exactly as the original by mentioning Haag-Streit AG, Switzerland as the owner of the copyright. § Non-academic, non-personal or commercial users might only use this figures in whole or in part after a written authorization by the copyright holder. § “Haag-Streit”, “ 900” and “Octopus” are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Haag-Streit Holding AG. § The following are either registered trademarks or trademarks of Carl Zeiss Meditec: “Guided Progression Analysis”, “GPA”, “Humphrey”, “HFA”, “SITA Fast”, “SITA Standard”, “Visual Field Index”, and “VFI”. § Copyright © 2018 HAAG-STREIT AG

Fig. 11 -1: Low spatial resolution with static perimetry

Fig. 11 -2: Slow peripheral testing with static perimetry

Fig. 11 -3: Kinetic testing method

Fig. 11 -4: Identification of local scotomas with kinetic perimetry

Fig. 11 -5: Hill of vision as a topographical map

Fig. 11 -6: Static versus kinetic perimetry

Fig. 11 -7: The goldmann perimeter and its successor, the OCTOPUS 900

Fig. 11 -8: Normal isopters for different stimulus types

Fig. 11 -9: Stimulus intensities in kinetic perimetry

Fig. 11 -10: Normal isopters

Fig. 11 -11: Mapping the outline of the hill of vision

Fig. 11 -12: Detailing the boundaries of an isopter

Fig. 11 -13: Identification of isolated scotomas

Fig. 11 -14: Placement of vectors and static points using different stimulus types

Fig. 11 -15: Distinction between absolute and relative scotomas

Fig. 11 -16: Checking for short-term fluctuation

Fig. 11 -17: Checking for false positives

Fig. 11 -18: Checking for false negatives

Fig. 11 -19: Patient reaction time compensation

Fig. 11 -20: Example of the clinical usefulness of reaction time compensation

Fig. 11 -21 A: Step-by-step example of a kinetic test with several isopters (Steps 1 -2)

Fig. 11 -21 B: Step-by-step example of a kinetic test with several isopters (Steps 3 -8)

Fig. 11 -21 C: Step-by-step example of a kinetic test with several isopters (Steps 9 -14)

Fig. 11 -22: Example of fully automated kinetic perimetry to test for ptosis

Fig. 11 -23: Example of customized templates for neuroophthalmic conditions

Table 11 -1: Comparison between static and kinetic perimetry

Table 11 -2: Comparison between Octopus kinetic perimetry and Goldmann kinetic perimetry

Table 11 -3: Goldmann stimulus size I to V