Visual Evoked Potentials M Etemadifar Neurologist IUMS What

  • Slides: 51
Download presentation
Visual Evoked Potentials M. Etemadifar Neurologist, IUMS

Visual Evoked Potentials M. Etemadifar Neurologist, IUMS

What is evoked potential? Electrical potentials that occur in the cortex after stimulation of

What is evoked potential? Electrical potentials that occur in the cortex after stimulation of a sense organ which can be recorded by surface electrodes is known as Evoked Potential. eg. SEP, ABR and VEP

Introduction: • The VEP tests the function of the visual pathway from the retina

Introduction: • The VEP tests the function of the visual pathway from the retina to the occipital cortex. • It assesses the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and optic radiations to the occipital cortex.

Cont. . • The VEP is very useful in detecting an anterior visual conduction

Cont. . • The VEP is very useful in detecting an anterior visual conduction disturbance. • However, it is not specific with regard to etiology. For example a tumor compressing the optic nerve, an ischemic disturbance, or a demyelinating disease may cause delay in the P 100.

Cont… • VEPs are most useful in testing optic nerve function and less useful

Cont… • VEPs are most useful in testing optic nerve function and less useful in postchiasmatic disorders. • In retrochiasmatic lesions, the MRI is a more useful test.

Comparison of VEP with MRI VEP MRI • The VEP explains the functionality of

Comparison of VEP with MRI VEP MRI • The VEP explains the functionality of visual pathway. • VEP gives us information about the physiology of a anatomical pathway with much less spatial or localizing information • VEP is useful primarily in assessing optic nerve function in the anterior (prechiasmatic) portion. • It is lateralizing but not localizing to the lesion. • The MRI largely remains an imaging, structural, or anatomical test. • The MRI scan gives more accurate information about structural problems • MRI is a highly accurate localizing modality Under given circumstances they may be complementary. to each other.

VEP generator site • Visual Cortex (occipital lobe) The generator site is believed to

VEP generator site • Visual Cortex (occipital lobe) The generator site is believed to be the peristriate and striate occipital cortex.

Types of VEP • Flash VEP • Pattern VEP– full field – hemi field

Types of VEP • Flash VEP • Pattern VEP– full field – hemi field – central field – partial field • Chromatic patterned stimuli-best method of separating red, green , and blue coloured channels. Helpful in detecting colour blindness.

How to do the test ? • • SKIN PREPARATION APPLY ELECTRODE USING JELLY

How to do the test ? • • SKIN PREPARATION APPLY ELECTRODE USING JELLY RECORDING – Oz REFERENCE – Fpz GROUND – Cz ELECTRODE IMPEDANCE BELOW 5 KΏ AMPLIFICATION , FILTER , SWEEP SPEED, AVERAGING TO BE CHECKED

Procedure • The room should be dark. • Test mono-ocularly with other eye covered.

Procedure • The room should be dark. • Test mono-ocularly with other eye covered. • Stimulus: Checkerboard pattern (or less often, flash) is used as stimulation two reversal/sec. • Stimulus rates of 1 -2 Hz are recommended • The recommended recording time window (ie, sweep length) is 250 ms. • Seating distance: 70 -100 cm from the monitor screen • Fix the gaze at a colored dot in the center of the screen.

Cont… • Apply three scalp electrodes at; Oz : 2 cms above the inion.

Cont… • Apply three scalp electrodes at; Oz : 2 cms above the inion. Cz : at vertex Fz : on frontal bone. • Check the impedance of the electrodes. • In the menu enter patient’s info (name, age , sex, ID no. ref. Dr. • Start averaging process. • Continue averaging till 1000 stimulus repetition complete. It will stop automatically.

Cont… • After the stimulus are over you will get NPN complex. • Identify

Cont… • After the stimulus are over you will get NPN complex. • Identify the waves & apply the wave markers. the values will appear in the table. • Repeat the procedure & get another record. • Display both the recordings and superimpose them to show the reproducibility of the test results. • Repeat the procedure for other eye.

Stimulus factors & VEP • • PATTERN FIELD SIZE DISTANCE CONTRAST LUMINANCE COLOURS RATE

Stimulus factors & VEP • • PATTERN FIELD SIZE DISTANCE CONTRAST LUMINANCE COLOURS RATE OF REVERSAL

Patient factors & VEP • • • AGE GENDER EYE DOMINANCE VISUAL ACUITY PUPILLARY

Patient factors & VEP • • • AGE GENDER EYE DOMINANCE VISUAL ACUITY PUPILLARY SIZE ALERTNESS

Factors influencing VEP • • The size of the checks Pupillary size Gender (women

Factors influencing VEP • • The size of the checks Pupillary size Gender (women have slightly shorter P 100 latencies ), and Age: below 1 yr of age P 100 may be 160 ms, & above 60 yrs. also it get delayed. • Sedation and anesthesia abolish the VEP. • Visual acuity deterioration up to 20/200 does not alter the response significantly. • Drugs. (eg. carbamazepine and sodium valproate prolong P 100 latency)

VEP -IFCN

VEP -IFCN

REFERENCE RECORDING GROUND

REFERENCE RECORDING GROUND

VEP

VEP

Analysis • Identify the waves (NPN complex) • Determine the absolute peak latencies. •

Analysis • Identify the waves (NPN complex) • Determine the absolute peak latencies. • Determine the amplitude of the waves. • Determine the interocular latency difference.

Interpretation • Negative components of NPN complex may be absent even in normal subject.

Interpretation • Negative components of NPN complex may be absent even in normal subject. The only persistent wave is P 100.

Waveforms (The NPN complex) • The initial negative peak (N 1 or N 75)

Waveforms (The NPN complex) • The initial negative peak (N 1 or N 75) • A large positive peak (P 1 or P 100) • Negative peak (N 2 or N 145) N 75 N 145 P 100

 • Delayed P 100 is due to, 1. Demyelination of optic nerve. 2.

• Delayed P 100 is due to, 1. Demyelination of optic nerve. 2. Axonal degeneration. • Low voltage of P 100 is due to, Problems of refrective medias of eye. eg. Corneal opacity, cataract , vitreous hemorrhage. • Voltage should not be less than 5 mv.

Full field PVEP- criteria for abnormality Latency criteria • Prolongation > 3 sd •

Full field PVEP- criteria for abnormality Latency criteria • Prolongation > 3 sd • Interocular latency of p 100>10 msec, longer latency abnormal Amplitude criteria • Interocular amplitude ratio>2 • Abnomally low or high amplitude • Absence of identifiable VEP from midline and lateral occipital sites.

Maximum Value for P 100 • P 100 is 110 milliseconds (ms) in patients

Maximum Value for P 100 • P 100 is 110 milliseconds (ms) in patients younger than 60 years (it rises to 120 ms thereafter in females and 125 ms in males. ) (Even though published norms are available in the medical literature, each individual laboratory should have its own norms to control for lab-to-lab variability in technique. ) • Interocular P 100 latency difference is upto 5 – 6 ms. > 10 ms is gross abnprmality.

Flash VEP • Cortical response to flash – widespread , complex and variable •

Flash VEP • Cortical response to flash – widespread , complex and variable • Absence is abnormal • Used in situations when PVEP not possible –ocular scarring, ocular haemorrhages • Done through closed eyes • Unaffected by refractive error • Useful in children and uncooperative patients

Chromatic patterned VEP • Best method to separate blue, red and green coloured channels

Chromatic patterned VEP • Best method to separate blue, red and green coloured channels • Can help in detecting color blindness

Hemifield VEP Indications • Optic chiasmal or retro chiasmal lesion • Marked interhemispheric asymmetry

Hemifield VEP Indications • Optic chiasmal or retro chiasmal lesion • Marked interhemispheric asymmetry of VEP on monocular stimulation

Bilateral abnormal full field PVEP • Bilateral lesions in optic nerve, optic chiasm, behind

Bilateral abnormal full field PVEP • Bilateral lesions in optic nerve, optic chiasm, behind chiasm, retinal degeneration, butterfly gliomas of corpus callosum.

Monocular abnormal full field VEP • Conduction defect anterior to optic chiasm • Demyelination

Monocular abnormal full field VEP • Conduction defect anterior to optic chiasm • Demyelination common • retinal disease , glaucoma , compression of optic nerve cannot be excluded.

Full field PVEP interpretation • VEP normal in unilateral lesions of optic chiasm with

Full field PVEP interpretation • VEP normal in unilateral lesions of optic chiasm with monocular stimulation because each eye projects to both occipital lobes.

Full field PVEP interpretation • If P 100 abnormality occurs in stimulation of one

Full field PVEP interpretation • If P 100 abnormality occurs in stimulation of one eye the lesion is anterior to optic chiasm i. e optic nerve, retina or other intra ocular structures.

Differential diagnosis with abnormal (prolong. P 100 latency) VEP • Multiple sclerosis • •

Differential diagnosis with abnormal (prolong. P 100 latency) VEP • Multiple sclerosis • • • Optic neuropathy Optic neuritis Toxic amblyopia eg. Tobacco smoking, alcohol. Glaucoma Ischemic optic neuropathy Tumors compressing the optic nerve - Optic nerve gliomas, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, giant aneurysms, and pituitary tumors • Normal VEP virtually excludes an optic nerve or anterior chiasmatic lesion.

Clinical usefulness of VEPs • More sensitive than MRI or physical examination in prechiasmatic

Clinical usefulness of VEPs • More sensitive than MRI or physical examination in prechiasmatic lesions • Objective and reproducible test for optic nerve function • Abnormality persists over long periods of time • Inexpensive as compared with to MRI • Under certain circumstances, may be helpful to positively establish optic nerve function in patients with subjective complaint of visual loss; normal VEP excludes significant optic nerve disorder

Clinical applications of PVEP • Detects subclinical lesions in MS • Detects subclinical involvement

Clinical applications of PVEP • Detects subclinical lesions in MS • Detects subclinical involvement of optic pathways in neurofibroma, Antibiotics • Evaluation of visual loss in hysteria, malingering • Monitoring visual functions during operations around pituitary • Confirmation of lesion of optic nerve tumour

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) • Its a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system,

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) • Its a chronic demyelinating disease of the central nervous system, which predominantly affects young adults during their most productive years. Viral and autoimmune etiologies are postulated. Genetic and environmental factors are known to contribute to MS, but a specific cause for this disease is not identified.

 • Pathologically, MS is characterized by the presence of areas of demyelination and

• Pathologically, MS is characterized by the presence of areas of demyelination and Tcell predominant perivascular inflammation in the brain white matter. Some axons may be spared from these pathological processes • Differential diagnosis for MS includes other demyelinating diseases of the nervous system, often of a viral or postinfectious origin

PVEP in demyelination • Prolonged latency of P 100 or absence of VEP during

PVEP in demyelination • Prolonged latency of P 100 or absence of VEP during acute attack • Abnormal PVEP in 90% patients with optic neuritis • P 100 prolongation persists many years – unilateral marked increase in latency with normal wave form and amplitude.

VEP IN MS

VEP IN MS

PVEP in disorders of optic nerve Ischemic optic neuritis • Invariably abnormal • Amplitude

PVEP in disorders of optic nerve Ischemic optic neuritis • Invariably abnormal • Amplitude affected or absent VEP • Mild latency increase Toxins/ drugs • PVEP absent / delayed • Can revert following treatment • Used to monitor drug toxicity

PVEP in disorders of optic nerve • Compression of anterior visual pathway – decreased

PVEP in disorders of optic nerve • Compression of anterior visual pathway – decreased amplitude, distorted wave, mild latency prolongation • Leber’s atrophy, spino cerebellar degenerations –increased latency

PVEP in retinopathies • Increased latency with preservation of waveform similar to demyelination •

PVEP in retinopathies • Increased latency with preservation of waveform similar to demyelination • Hence opthalmological examination mandatory in symptomatic visual loss.

PVEP in glaucoma • PVEP abnormal in 50% of patients with field defects •

PVEP in glaucoma • PVEP abnormal in 50% of patients with field defects • Increased latency with decreased amplitude of P 100

PVEP in hysteria and malingering • Normal wave and latency makes severe visual loss

PVEP in hysteria and malingering • Normal wave and latency makes severe visual loss unlikely • Normal PVEPs occasionally reported in cortical blindness when part of striate cortex is preserved.