VIR 316 Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe

VIR 316 Comparing Private Cloud Capabilities Michael Pascoe Managing Director – Olikka @Olikka. Tech

partner Gold Virtualisation Olikka & Management - Gold Desktop Michael Pascoe Managing Director - Silver Server @Olikka. Tech

is a specialist systems integrator We are experts in Infrastructure Management and Virtualization We specialise in the Design and Deployment of Microsoft and Citrix software We focus on two areas Private Cloud and Windows Client

Comparing… Core Virtualisation Platforms Private Cloud Capabilities VIR 311 On Demand Private Cloud Choices Private Cloud Comparisons

Pooled Resources Plus with Private Cloud… Self-Service Elastic Usage Based Control Customizable It’s cloud, dedicated to you

Self-Service v. Cloud Director App Controller Service Mgmt. VMware Service Manager Protection Data Recovery 2. 0 Data Protection Manager Automation v. Center Orchestrator Monitoring v. Center Ops Mgmt. Suite v. Fabric App Perf Mgr, v. Fabric Hyperic Operations Manager VM Management v. Center v. Fabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Hypervisor v. Sphere Hypervisor Hyper-V

Self-Service Standard Advanced Enterprise v. Cloud Director App Controller Service Mgmt. Enterprise VMware Service Manager Protection Standard Data Advanced Recovery Enterprise 2. 0 Automation Standard Advanced Enterprise v. Center Orchestrator Data Protection Manager System Center 2012 Orchestrator Monitoring v. Center Ops Mgmt. Suite Advanced Enterprise v. Fabric App Perf Mgr, v. Fabric Hyperic Operations Manager v. Center v. Fabric Application Director Virtual Machine Manager Standard Advanced Enterprise v. Sphere Hypervisor Hyper-V (free) Hyper-V VM Management Hypervisor Standard Advanced Enterprise

Self-Service Management Protection Automation Monitoring VM Management Hypervisor

All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

Comparison Focus All about the App

Constructing, Delivering & Consuming Apps Maintaining, Managing & Monitoring Apps Protection of Key Applications & Workloads

All About the App demo Agile Service Delivery

Construction, Delivery & Consumption Standardized VM Templates Roles & Features Application Layers VM Templates 2. 0: Service Templates Deployment into clouds Role-based Self Service Controlled Consumption

Application Construction, Delivery & Consumption Capability Microsoft VMware Request Private Cloud Resources Yes Unproven 1 Role-Based Self-Service Yes 2 Standardized Templates Yes 3 Template Granularity: Roles / Features Yes No Template Granularity: Application Layer Yes 4 Service/Multi-Tier Templates Yes 4 Deployment Across Heterogeneous Clouds Yes No 1. 2. 3. 4. VMware v. Cloud Request Manager has been deprecated with customers recommended to upgrade to VMware Service Manager Requires v. Cloud Director, available at additional cost Each VMware VM template will have it’s own VMDK, even if the template varies only slightly in it’s configuration options. Whilst VMware offer no alternative to Server App-V, v. Fabric Application Director would allow more granular control over the application layer for certain apps, and provide the ability to deploy multi-tiered services VMware Information: http: //www. vmware. com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview. html, http: //www. vmware. com/files/pdf/vfabric/VMwarev. Fabric-Application-Director-Datasheet. pdf

All About the App demo Reducing Time to Resolution

Maintenance, Management & Monitoring Centralized Maintenance Extends beyond the private cloud Integrated Service Management Powerful, relevant automation Deep application insight Connecting Dev-Ops

Application Maintenance, Management & Monitoring Capability 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Microsoft VMware Centralized Patching & Maintenance Yes 1 Non-Virtualized Infrastructure Management Yes 2 Integrated Service Management Yes Unproven 3 Heterogeneous Automation Yes VMware Centric 4 Deep Application Insight Yes Multiple Tools 5 Integrated Dev-Ops Yes No 6 VMware, with Update Manager, can patch ESXi Hosts, and with the v. Center Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus, can manage physical hosts, and guest OS’s from a patching perspective. Customers would require VMware Hyperic to perform any kind of monitoring of the physical infrastructure. Both of these additional products are licensed per VM and come at considerable expense. Would require v. Center Operations Management Suite Enterprise Plus and VMware Hyperic to manage any physical systems. v. Cloud Request Manager deprecated with customers encouraged to upgrade to the unproven VMware Service Manager, with no guarantees of integration with other v. Center Management Components. VMware's v. Center Orchestrator has a limited set of plug-ins, of which the vast majority are VMware centric. No mention of plug-ins for other enterprise management systems and tools such as those from HP, IBM, BMC etc. VMware require multiple tools to deliver any form of insight. v. Center Operations will monitor hosts, v. Fabric Hyperic will monitor applications on physical servers, but simply collects metrics, without providing guidance for remediation. v. Fabric APM required for insight into a limited number of applications Lab Manager deprecated, with customers expected to upgrade to v. Cloud Director, which has no connections with Development IDE. VMware Information: http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/compare-editions. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/application-platform/vfabrichyperic/overview. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/vcloud-request-manager/overview. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/service-manager/overview. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-orchestrator/plugins. html , http: //www. vmware. com/products/labmanager/overview. html

Protection of Key Applications & Workloads Granular Workload Protection Physical or Virtual Generic Data Source Protection Centralized, Role. Based Management Backup to Tape Low-Cost Disaster Recovery

Protection of Key Applications & Workloads Capability 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Microsoft VMware Granular Workload Protection Yes No 1 Physical & Virtual Protection Yes No 1 3 rd Party Integration Yes No 2 Centralized Role-Based Management Yes No 3 Tape Backup Yes No 4 Low Cost Disaster Recovery Yes No 5 VMware Data Recovery 2. 0 offers no protection for the workloads within the virtual machine, simply focusing on the VM itself as the protection unit and offers no protection of physical machines VMware Data Recovery 2. 0 is not extensible by 3 rd parties VMware Data Recovery 2. 0 appliances are unaware of one another, leading to potentially duplicated backups, or missed backups. VMware Data Recovery 2. 0 offers no protection to tape media. Disk only VMware v. Center Site Recovery Manager provides a solution for disaster recovery, it comes at significant additional cost, which rises for each VM that is protected. VMware Information: http: //www. vmware. com/products/data-recovery/overview. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/site-recovery-manager/features. html

Cross Platform from the metal up Comparison Focus Cross Platform from the metal up

Cross Platform from the metal up Application Frameworks Management OS Hypervisor Fabric

Cross Platform from the metal up demo Heterogeneous Management

Cross-Platform Infrastructure Management Capability 1. 2. 3. 4. Microsoft VMware Multi-Hypervisor Management Yes No 1 Comprehensive Guest OS Support Yes 2 3 rd Party Management Integration Yes Limited 3 Multiple Application Frameworks Yes Spring 4 VMware v. Center manages VMware ESX and ESXi only. Would require additional 3 rd party technologies to manage alternative hypervisors. VMware do not produce any operating systems, and support is therefore focused not on the guest operating system itself, but instead, on the VM Tools and hardware. A number of enterprise management tools integrate with v. Center, however VMware’s management tools, and orchestration tools lack broad interoperability with other systems. v. Fabric is a platform focused 100% on Spring, Java, and is available at considerable expense, on a per VM basis. Development tools are disconnected from other management tools, and only v. Fabric APM can provide insight into the applications, available at additional expense. VMware Information: http: //partnerweb. vmware. com/GOSIG/home. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenterorchestrator/plugins. html, http: //www. vmware. com/products/application-platform/vfabric-hyperic/plugins. html. http: //www. vmware. com/products/application-platform/

Foundation for the Future Comparison Focus Foundation for the Future

Foundation for the Future

Foundation for the Future Scalability, Performance & Density Security & Multitenancy Flexible Infrastructure Host: 320 LP | 4 TB Host: 1024 VMs VM: 64 v. CPU | 1 TB VM: 64 TB VHDX Cluster: 64 | 4000 Virtual Fiber Channel 4 K Disk Support ODX Qo. S Extensible Switch: PVLANS ARP/ND Spoofing DHCP Guard Monitoring Mirroring DVMQ | SR-IOV IPsec Task Offload Bit. Locker Live Migration Storage Migration Shared-Nothing LM Network Virtualization High Availability & Resiliency Incremental Backup Hyper-V Replica NIC Teaming Cluster: 64 | 4000 Secure Clustered Storage Enhanced CSV 3 Level Availability Priority & Affinity Hyper-V: A More Complete Virtualization Platform

Cloud on your terms Comparison Focus Cloud on your terms

Cloud on your terms Microsoft Public Cloud Microsoft Private Cloud System Center 2012 Microsoft Private Cloud

Cloud on your terms v. Cloud Connector v. Cloud

Comparison Focus Costs of the Cloud

15: 1 VM to Host Ratio 34 Hosts 2 CPU w/ 16 Cores Comprehensive Management Windows Server licensing additional 68 CPUs of Windows Server Datacenter

68 CPUs Hyper-V Server $0 68 CPUs System Center 2012 $122, 638* Total Cost $122, 638 Provides complete infrastructure management including: Application Performance Management, Self-Service, Backup & Application Protection, IT Service Management & Service Catalog, Orchestration and much more… * System Center Pricing: http: //download. microsoft. com/download/1/11128 EC 7 -2 BE 7 -480 C-9 D 46 -4 ECECA 9 E 481 A/System%20 Center%202012%20 Licensing%20 Datasheet. pdf

68 CPUs v. Sphere ENT+ $237, 6601 v. Center $4, 9951 v. COPS ENT $97, 5002 v. Fabric APM $180, 0003 v. Fabric AD $125, 0004 v. Cloud Director $75, 0005 Costs, without S&S in excess of $720, 155 yet lacks service management, workload protection, in-guest management, and costs grow with density due to per-VM licensing 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. v. Sphere Enterprise Plus CPU & v. Center Pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/vsphere/pricing. html v. Center Operations Management Suite Enterprise pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcenter-operations-management/buy. html v. Fabric Application Performance Manager Pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/application-platform/vfabric-application-performance-manager/buy. html v. Fabric Application Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/application-platform/vfabric-appdirector/how-to-buy. html v. Cloud Director Pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/vcloud-director/buy. html

68 CPUs v. Cloud Suite Standard $339, 6601 • • v. Sphere Enterprise Plus v. Cloud Director v. Cloud Connector v. Cloud Networking and Security Standard 68 CPUs v. Cloud Suite Enterprise $781, 6601 68 CPUs v. Cloud Suite Advanced $509, 6601 • • • v. Cloud Suite Standard v. Cloud Networking and Security Advanced v. Center Operations Management Suite Advanced 1. v. Cloud Suite Pricing (Excluding S&S): http: //www. vmware. com/products/datacenter-virtualization/vcloud-suite/pricing. html • • v. Cloud Suite Advanced v. Center Operations Management Suite Enterprise v. Fabric Application Director v. Center Site Recovery Manager Enterprise

Summary Closing Thoughts

All About the App Cross-Platform From the Metal Up Foundation For the Future Cloud On Your Terms

Breakout Sessions VIR 311 VIR 317 SIM 332 SIM 333 Comparing Core Virtualisation Platforms (Online) Deploying Virtualisation Infrastructure from Ground Zero Private Cloud Service Delivery and Automation with System Center 2012 Application Management Find Me Later At… Twitter Blog @Olikka. Tech http: //bolikka. com