Vehicle Approval case study A Same type approval

  • Slides: 8
Download presentation
Vehicle Approval case study A) Same type approval R 79 for new vehicles and

Vehicle Approval case study A) Same type approval R 79 for new vehicles and already registered vehicles New vehicle with HW and SW updates All Type date for 02 series R 79 -01 Appr. 321 -00 RXSWIN 1 R 79 -02 Appr. 321 -03 HW change SW change RXSWIN 4 R 79 -01 Appr. 321 -01 HW change SW change RXSWIN 2 R 79 -01 Appr. 32102 SW change RXSWIN 3 R 79 -? ? Appr. 321 -04 SW change RXSWIN 5 Registered vehicle with SW updates For already registered vehicles: - SW updates are based on original HW - RXSWIN 3 & RXSWIN 5 are not necessarily related to RXSWIN 2 & RXSWIN 4 - Extension of approvals stay within original regulation series Þ In some cases, it is not possible to have the same approval for new vehicles and already registered vehicles (see example above with Approval x) 1

Vehicle Approval case study B) Different type approvals R 79 for new vehicles and

Vehicle Approval case study B) Different type approvals R 79 for new vehicles and registered vehicles New vehicle with HW and SW updates Production stop All Type date for 02 series R 79 -01 Appr. 322 -00 RXSWIN 01 R 79 -01 Appr. 322 -01 HW change SW change RXSWIN 02 R 79 -01 Appr. 323 -00 SW change RXSWIN 91 R 79 -01 Appr. 323 -01 SW change RXSWIN 92 R 79 -02 Appr. 322 -02 SW change RXSWIN 03 R 79 -01 Appr. 323 -02 SW change RXSWIN 93 Notify discontinuation Appr. 322 R 79 -01 Appr. 323 -03 SW change RXSWIN 94 R 79 -01 Appr. 323 -04 SW change RXSWIN 95 Registered vehicle with SW updates Þ With different type approvals for new vehicles and registered vehicles, all issues addressed in the previous slide can be covered. 2

Text proposal as an example for ECE R 79 Paragraph 1. 5 of Annex

Text proposal as an example for ECE R 79 Paragraph 1. 5 of Annex B The vehicle manufacturer may obtain a new vehicle approval for the purpose of differentiating software versions intended to be used on vehicles already registered in the market from the software versions that are used on new vehicles. In agreement with the testing agency duplication of tests shall be avoided where possible. 3

ANNEX

ANNEX

Vehicle Approval case study The SW update requirement of a given Regulation should allow

Vehicle Approval case study The SW update requirement of a given Regulation should allow to obtain separate approvals for - SW of new vehicles (in production) - SW update of registered vehicles Background: - - - Approvals or extensions of approvals for registered vehicles are a new concept for UN ECE 1958 agreement. Such a new concept should allow a different approach: - SW updates may be specifique for registered vehicles - SW updates for registered vehicles may be managed separately from new vehicle specifications by an OEM Not every CP is requesting approvals of SW updates: - System approvals (e. g. R 79) are used for several countries with same specifications Separating the registered vehicle specification avoids unnecessary updates of National Vehicle Type approval for these CP (e. g. If new vehicle SW and registered vehicle SW of R 79 is within the same approval, we have to update the National Type Approval in every Country that uses this R 79 approval) depending on OEM’s internal SW version management system, the management of SW versions is easier -> Both ways should be allowed depending on OEM’s choice 5

Proposals: Most important is that Contracting Parties that grant approvals of SW updates don’t

Proposals: Most important is that Contracting Parties that grant approvals of SW updates don’t object to obtain a separate approval (These CP are not necessarily represented in this TF CS/OTA): 1. In Annex B (Annex integrating RXSWIN into each UN ECE Reg. ) 2. In the recommendation 6

Vehicle Approval case study (for NTA) NTA Country A NTA Country B R 79

Vehicle Approval case study (for NTA) NTA Country A NTA Country B R 79 (incl. new vehicle RXSWIN) + R 79 (incl. registered vehicle RXSWIN) R 79 (incl. new vehicle RXSWIN) R 13 H (incl. new vehicle RXSWIN) + R 13 H (incl. registered vehicle RXSWIN) R 13 H (incl. new vehicle RXSWIN) RXX Country A is UNECE Contracting Party with obligation of UNECE registered vehicle SW update approval RXX Country B has no obligation of UNECE registered vehicle SW update approval 7

Vehicle Approval case study (vehicle life cycle) Model cycle for 1 regulation Vehicle Specification

Vehicle Approval case study (vehicle life cycle) Model cycle for 1 regulation Vehicle Specification Today New vehicle R 79 approval new vehicle Future RXX SW R 79 approvals registered vehicle Actuator Sensor Soft New OTA 1 Project 1 OTA 2 Project 2 OTA 3 Project 3 Vehicle (registered (New vehicle) type vehicle only) vehicle only A No change B No change A No change B No change A A' B A'', B' C A''', B'', C' D A / A / B / B / B A / B / C / D / A / A, B / A, B / / A', A'', B' / A', A''', B‘, / B'', C' 8