VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Evaluation CLINICAL symptoms physical findings

  • Slides: 50
Download presentation

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Evaluation • CLINICAL • symptoms • physical findings • rhythm •

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Evaluation • CLINICAL • symptoms • physical findings • rhythm • cardiac size • ventricular hypertrophy • PAH • RHF • complications • ECG / CXR • Echo – TTE / TEE / 3 D • Stress tests • CAG / CT / MRI / Angio Assessment of the risks for intervention

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Surgical risk assessment 4 parameters STS PROM … institution related <

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Surgical risk assessment 4 parameters STS PROM … institution related < 4 % ; 4 – 8 % ; > 8 % ; Iyr mortality + morbidity > 50% Frailty 7 indices – feeding, bathing, dressing, transferring, toileting, continence ambulation – no walking aid / assist required / 5 m walk in less than 6 s Major organ dysfunction Procedure specific impediment none / possible / severe

STAGES OF HEART DISEASES A At risk Patients with risk factors for development of

STAGES OF HEART DISEASES A At risk Patients with risk factors for development of VHD B Progressive Patients with progressive VHD (mild-to-moderate severity and asymptomatic) C Asymptomatic severe Asymptomatic patients who have the criteria for severe VHD: C 1: Asymptomatic patients with severe VHD in whom the left or right ventricle remains compensated C 2: Asymptomatic patients with severe VHD, with decompensation of the left or right ventricle D Symptomatic severe For AS D 1. . High gradient AS D 2. . Low flow gradient AS D 3. . Paradoxical low flow

MITRAL STENOSIS

MITRAL STENOSIS

MITRAL STENOSIS Severe MVA < 1. 5 cm 2 < 1. 5 cm -

MITRAL STENOSIS Severe MVA < 1. 5 cm 2 < 1. 5 cm - very severe PHT > 150 ms ( > 220 - , , ) PASP > 30 mm Hg Dilated left atrium

MITRAL STENOSIS

MITRAL STENOSIS

MITRAL STENOSIS Indications for intervention PTMC ( favourable valve morphology , no LA clots

MITRAL STENOSIS Indications for intervention PTMC ( favourable valve morphology , no LA clots , no / mild MR) Class I Severe symptomatic MS (D) Class II a Very severe ; asymptomatic MS Class II b Severe MS ; NYHA III / IV ; unfavourable anatomy; High surgical risk Moderate MS ; symptomatic ; PAWP > 25 mm Hg on exercise MVR symptomatic severe MS not suitable for PTMC

MR – vena contracta

MR – vena contracta

MITRAL REGURGITATION Severe MR • central jet MR > 40 % of LA •

MITRAL REGURGITATION Severe MR • central jet MR > 40 % of LA • holosystolic eccentric MR • VC > 7 mm • RV > 60 ml ; RF > 50 % ; ERO > 0. 4 cm 2 • Angio grade 3 /4 • LV dilatation - ESD > 40 mm • PAH … PASP > 50 mm Hg • moderate to severe LA enlargement EF < 60 % -- LV dysfunction

MITRAL REGURGITATION Indications for intervention Class I stage D ; EF > 30 %

MITRAL REGURGITATION Indications for intervention Class I stage D ; EF > 30 % stage C 2 ; EF 30 – 60 % stage C 1 + other cardiac surgery Class II a MV repair C 1 success rate > 95 % ; op. mortality < 1 % + new onset AF / SPAP > 50 mm Hg + other cardiac surgery

AORTIC REGURGITATION Severe • jet width > 65 % of LVOT • vencontracta >

AORTIC REGURGITATION Severe • jet width > 65 % of LVOT • vencontracta > 6 mm • RV > 60 ml ; RF > 50 % ; RO > 0. 3 cm 2 • Holodiastolic reversal in abd. aorta • LV dilatation ( ESD > 50 mm or > 25 mm / m 2 ; EDD > 65 mm ) • Angio grade – 3 / 4

AORTIC REGURGITATION Indications for surgery Class I stage D stage C 2 stage C

AORTIC REGURGITATION Indications for surgery Class I stage D stage C 2 stage C 1 + other cardiac surgery Class II a stage C 1 + LV dilatation stage B + other cardiac surgery

AORTIC STENOSIS

AORTIC STENOSIS

AORTIC STENOSIS Valve area (cm 2) • normal - 3. 0 – 4. 0

AORTIC STENOSIS Valve area (cm 2) • normal - 3. 0 – 4. 0 ( 2 cm 2 / m 2 ) • mild AS - 1. 5 – 2. 0 • moderate AS - 1. 0 – 1. 5 • severe AS - < 1. 0 ( < 0. 6 cm 2 / m 2 ) • critical AS - < 0. 75 ( < 0. 5 cm 2 / m 2 )

AORTIC STENOSIS

AORTIC STENOSIS

3 D TEE

3 D TEE

AORTIC STENOSIS Dimensionless valve index (velocity ratio) Very simple method Variable of area is

AORTIC STENOSIS Dimensionless valve index (velocity ratio) Very simple method Variable of area is taken away from the continuity equation LVOT velocity Aortic valve velocity Value < 0. 25. . Severe AS

SEVERE AS Peak gradient = 120 mm Hg ( Vmax 5. 4 m /

SEVERE AS Peak gradient = 120 mm Hg ( Vmax 5. 4 m / s Dimensionless index = 0. 5 / 5. 5 = 0. 1

V 1 = 1. 5 m /sec V 2 = 4 m / sec

V 1 = 1. 5 m /sec V 2 = 4 m / sec DI = 1. 5 / 4 = 0. 375

AORTIC STENOSIS Global LV hemodynamic load Valvuloarterial impedance ( Z va ) Valvular resistance

AORTIC STENOSIS Global LV hemodynamic load Valvuloarterial impedance ( Z va ) Valvular resistance + vascular resistance Mean gradient Zva = SBP + mean gradient Stroke volume index > 4. 5 … severe AS SBP

AORTIC STENOSIS Severity Parameters sclerosis mild AS moderate severe Vmax. . m/sec < 2.

AORTIC STENOSIS Severity Parameters sclerosis mild AS moderate severe Vmax. . m/sec < 2. 5 2. 6 – 2. 9 3. 0 – 3. 9 ≥ 4. 0 MPG mm Hg -- < 20 20 – 39 ≥ 40 AVA cm 2 -- > 1. 5 1. 0 – 1. 5 < 1. 0 AVAI cm 2 / m 2 -- > 0. 85 0. 6 – 0. 85 < 0. 6 Dimensionless index -- > 0. 5 0. 25 – 0. 5 < 0. 25 Zva > 4. 5 Very severe AS … V max > 5 m /s ; mean gr > 60 mm Hg

AORTIC STENOSIS Terminologies Low flow gradient severe AS Paradoxical low flow AS Pseudosevere AS

AORTIC STENOSIS Terminologies Low flow gradient severe AS Paradoxical low flow AS Pseudosevere AS

AORTIC STENOSIS DSE Valve area (cm 2) mean gr. (mm Hg) SVI change (

AORTIC STENOSIS DSE Valve area (cm 2) mean gr. (mm Hg) SVI change ( %) assessment < 1. 0 > 40 > 20 severe AS myocardium OK < 1. 0 < 40 < 20 myocardial failure ↑ by > 0. 3 no change > 20 pseudo severe AS

AORTIC STENOSIS Low flow gradient AS Valve area < 1. 0 cm 2 Mean

AORTIC STENOSIS Low flow gradient AS Valve area < 1. 0 cm 2 Mean gr. < 40 mm Hg SVI < 35 ml / m 2 EF < 50 % • severe AS with reversible LV dysfunction • with dobutamine – increase in gradient & SVI

AORTIC STENOSIS Paradoxical low flow severe AS ( Hachicha et al 2007) 1/3 rd

AORTIC STENOSIS Paradoxical low flow severe AS ( Hachicha et al 2007) 1/3 rd of cases ; poor surgical outcome Severe true AS … area < 1. 0 cm 2 Low flow … SVI < 35 ml / m 2 Preserved EF. . > 50 % 1. Impaired LVEDV • severe LVH • AF , tachycardia • MS , MR, PAH, TR 2. Impaired LV longitudinal strain

AORTIC STENOSIS Indications for intervention Class I stage D 1 , C 2 stage

AORTIC STENOSIS Indications for intervention Class I stage D 1 , C 2 stage C 1 + other cardiac surgery Class II a very severe AS + low surgical risk low flow gradient severe AS paradoxical low flow gradient AS stage C 1 + stress test > poor effort tolerance / fall in SBP stage B + other cardiac surgery

TRICUSPID REGURGITATION TV -- anatomy Complex apparatus Largest valve orifice area

TRICUSPID REGURGITATION TV -- anatomy Complex apparatus Largest valve orifice area

TR JET Normotensive TR Hypertensive TR

TR JET Normotensive TR Hypertensive TR

HEPATIC VEIN FLOW Normal severe TR

HEPATIC VEIN FLOW Normal severe TR

TRICUSPID REGURGITATION Mild Moderate Severe Jet area (cm 2) <5 5 -10 > 10

TRICUSPID REGURGITATION Mild Moderate Severe Jet area (cm 2) <5 5 -10 > 10 Vena contr. Not defined not defined (but < 7 mm > 7 mm PISA dia (cm) < 0. 5 – 0. 9 CW jet soft / parabolic dense / variable shape dense triangular early peak Hepatic Vein flow normal systolic blunting systolic reversal < 15 mm normal 15 -20 mm normal mild blunting > 20 mm absent IVC size respirophasic

TRICUSPID REGURGITATIOM RV function • RV fractional area change RV area(d) – RVarea (s)

TRICUSPID REGURGITATIOM RV function • RV fractional area change RV area(d) – RVarea (s) RV area (d) Normal. . 35 – 65 % • TAPSE … 15 – 30 mm • TDI … annular velocity … 6 -14 cm / s • MPI (PWD). . 0. 15 – 0. 40 • RVEF. . 45 – 70 %

Indications for TV surgery

Indications for TV surgery

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Specific situations Pregnancy Stenotic lesions are poorly tolerated Critical evaluation before

VALVULAR HEART DISEASE Specific situations Pregnancy Stenotic lesions are poorly tolerated Critical evaluation before pregnancy is important Balloon mitral / aortic valvuloplasty can be considered a little liberally