Using Propensity Score to adjust for unmeasured confounders
- Slides: 19
Using Propensity Score to adjust for unmeasured confounders in small area studies Yingbo Wang 1, Marta Blangiardo 1, Nicky Best 1, Sylvia Richardson 2 1 MRC-PHE 2 MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College London and Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge BAYES 2014 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 1
Presentation Outline o Multi-level modelling + Missing confounders? o Why Propensity Score (PS)? o The PS models – M 1+M 2+M 3 o PM 10 impact on CVD hospitalisation in England 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 2
Background: The missing confounders • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 3
England Area level data: Y, X, C, ? M Individual level Survey Data: m Individual 1 Ward 2 Individual 2 ? Ward 8000 + Individual 1 * The average ward size in England is approximately 6, 500 people M 1: Multilevel PS M 2: PS adjustment M 3: Missing PS 4
What is PS? PS Density • PS 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 5
The PS modelling framework M 1: PS calculation M 2: PS Adjust. model M 3: PS imputation 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 6
• 0. 1 0. 2 0. 6 0. 1 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 0. 4 0. 1 0. 2 7
In the areas where survey is available M 2: PS adjustment • PS 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 8
In the areas where survey is available M 2: PS adjustment - Example PS 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk PS 9
In the areas where survey is NOT available M 3: PS Imputation • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 10
Profile Regression – Construction • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 11
In the areas where survey is NOT available M 3: PS imputation- Example PS Linear imputation model C 1 26/08/2021 PS PS C 1 Prof. Reg – 25 Clusters Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 12 C 1
The DAG of three interlinked PS models 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 13
The impact of PM 10 on CVD Hospitalisation • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 14
The RR for PM 10 England excluding London • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 15
The RR for PM 10 London • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 16
Summary • 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 17
Acknowledgement Supervisors: Marta Blangiardo, Nicky Best, Sylvia Richardson Statistical discussions: Juan Gonzalez 26/08/2021 Geography and pollution data assistance Daniela Fecht Kees De Hoogh Database manager and IT support Peter Hambly Eric Johnson Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 18
References Mc. Candless, L. C. , Richardson, S. , and Best, N. (2012). Adjustment for missing confounders using external validation data and propensity scores. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(497): 40– 51. Molitor, J. , Papathomas, M. , Jerrett, M. , and Richardson, S. (2010). Bayesian profile regression with an application to the national survey of children’s health. Biostatistics, 11(3): 484– 498. Muller, P. , Quintana, F. , and Rosner, G. L. (2011). A product partition model with regression on covariates. Journal of computational and graphical statistics : a joint publication of American Statistical Association, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, Interface Foundation of North America, 20(1): 260– 278. PMID: 21566678 PMCID: PMC 3090756. Ohlssen, D. I. , Sharples, L. D. , and Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2007). Flexible random-effects models using bayesian semi-parametric models: applications to institutional comparisons. Statistics in Medicine, 26(9): 2088– 2112. Mason, A. , Richardson, S. , Plewis, I. , and Best, N. (2011). Strategy for modelling non-random missing data mechanisms in observational studies using bayesian methods. www. bias-project. org. uk. Besag, J. , York, J. and Mollie, A. (1991). Bayesian image restoration, with two applications in spatial statistics, Ann. Inst. Statist. Math. , 43, 159. Zigler, C. M. , Watts, K. , Yeh, R. W. , Wang, Y. , Coull, B. A. , & Dominici, F. (2013). Model Feedback in Bayesian Propensity Score Estimation. Biometrics. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1541 -0420. 2012. 01830. x Mc. Candless, L. C. , Douglas, I. J. , Evans, S. J. , & Smeeth, L. (2010). Cutting feedback in Bayesian regression adjustment for the propensity score. The International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(2), Article 16 26/08/2021 Email: y. wang 11@imperial. ac. uk 19
- Unmeasured anions
- Effect modification vs confounding
- Propensity score theorem
- Keynsian cross
- Propensity model meaning
- Flame outer cone
- Ipde process survey answers
- Call for fire script
- Merchandise inventory adjusting entry worksheet
- Please adjust accordingly
- Self-reinforcing effects generate extreme outcomes
- 2 law of multiplicity of evidence
- Ryse son of rome map
- How do you adjust the volume of the ef johnson 5112 radio?
- You separate hazards when you adjust your
- T-score statistics
- When to use t score vs z score
- Kassaregister ideell förening
- Elektronik för barn
- Borra hål för knoppar