Using Performance Criteria to Assess Student Outcomes Teaching

  • Slides: 19
Download presentation
Using Performance Criteria to Assess Student Outcomes Teaching & Learning Symposium May 20, 2009

Using Performance Criteria to Assess Student Outcomes Teaching & Learning Symposium May 20, 2009

Overview

Overview

Process

Process

Sources of SLOs n Professional Communities of Practice n Accrediting Bodies n Advisory Boards

Sources of SLOs n Professional Communities of Practice n Accrediting Bodies n Advisory Boards n Faculty

Student Learning Outcome Examples n Students should attain… n an ability to communicate effectively

Student Learning Outcome Examples n Students should attain… n an ability to communicate effectively n an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams n Students should gain personal and social responsibility, including n n Civic knowledge and engagement—local and global Intercultural knowledge and competence Ethical reasoning and action Foundations and skills for lifelong learning

Define student outcomes with measurable performance criteria n Focus data collection on key measures

Define student outcomes with measurable performance criteria n Focus data collection on key measures of student performance. n Assure that each criteria has meaning; i. e. , the faculty will be able to use the performance measure consistently to make valuable inferences about student learning and/or achievement n Support Faculty to discuss ways to assess and measure student knowledge, skills, attitudes or values and to link these across the curriculum

Outcome Attributes to Consider • Level & Dimension of Learning • • • Cognitive

Outcome Attributes to Consider • Level & Dimension of Learning • • • Cognitive Pyschomotor Affective • Learning Approach • Active • Collaborative • Problem Solving • Reflective

Performance Criteria n Facilitates the curriculum delivery strategies and assessment procedures (Rogers, 07). n

Performance Criteria n Facilitates the curriculum delivery strategies and assessment procedures (Rogers, 07). n Allows comparisons of performance across populations, treatments and setting n Is the “Observable and measurable manifestations of applied knowledge” (IEEE v 43, No 2, May 2000)

Clarifications

Clarifications

Identifying Outcomes, Objectives and Performance Criteria

Identifying Outcomes, Objectives and Performance Criteria

Engineering Problem Solving Exp. n Engineering Programs must demonstrate that their students attain an

Engineering Problem Solving Exp. n Engineering Programs must demonstrate that their students attain an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering

Engineering Examples n Engineering Education and Curricular Innovation site http: //www. engrng. pitt. edu/~ec

Engineering Examples n Engineering Education and Curricular Innovation site http: //www. engrng. pitt. edu/~ec 2000/outcomes_ html/BMO-attribute-g-6 -14. htm

Tools to Measure Performance Criteria n. Grades n. Portfolios n. Rubrics n. Observation (performance

Tools to Measure Performance Criteria n. Grades n. Portfolios n. Rubrics n. Observation (performance tasks) n. Artifacts (team meeting minutes, presentation plans, proposals, web pages, discussion threads, ) n. Employer Surveys n. Case studies n. Simulations n. Student Assessment of Learning Gains n. Quizzes n. Local/National Exams/Professional n. Alumni Survey

Strategy to Align Performance Criteria Across the Curriculum

Strategy to Align Performance Criteria Across the Curriculum

Practical Applications …. . n Engineering Professional Development’s Tech Communication Challenges n Overview of

Practical Applications …. . n Engineering Professional Development’s Tech Communication Challenges n Overview of Assessment Project to Define and Measure Effective Engineering Communication Learning Outcomes

Group Activity n Select a SLO n Develop 2 -3 performance criteria to measure

Group Activity n Select a SLO n Develop 2 -3 performance criteria to measure student learning outcome n Identify how to assess performance criteria

Sharing Out n Ideas n Experiences n Resources

Sharing Out n Ideas n Experiences n Resources

Wrap Up n Resources n Contact Us Laura Grossenbacher, Director Technical Communications Program, Engineering

Wrap Up n Resources n Contact Us Laura Grossenbacher, Director Technical Communications Program, Engineering Professional Development Dept. grossenb@engr. wisc. edu Moira Lafayette Director of Assessment College of Engineering moiral@engr. wisc. edu

Resources n Association of College and Research Libraries, Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher

Resources n Association of College and Research Libraries, Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, Retrieved on May 19, 2009 from http: //www. ala. org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/standards/informationliteracycompetency. cfm n Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), Faculty Workshop on Assessing Program Outcomes, October 2008. n Besterfield-Sacre, M. , L. J. Shurman, H. Wolfe, C. J. Atman, J. Mc. Gourty, et al. (2000). Defining the Outcomes: A Framework for EC 2000. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Education, 43(2), 100 – 110. Caffarella, R. S. (2002) Planning programs for adult learners: A practical Guide for educators, trainers and staff developers. (2 nd ed. ) San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Schandler, D. (2000). Competency and the Learning Organization. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications. n n