use your updown arrow keys andor your space
- Slides: 131
use your up/down arrow keys and/or your space bar to advance the slides Prehistoric Cultures University of Minnesota Duluth Tim Roufs © 2010 -2013 http: //www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 1602/ "Selam" aka "Lucy's Baby”
Main Characteristics of Anthropology Prehistoric Cultures University of Minnesota Duluth Tim Roufs © 2010 -2013 http: //www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 1602/ "Selam" aka "Lucy's Baby”
you’ve seen these listed in the Week 1 “Topics”. . .
you’ve seen these listed in the Week 1 “Topics”. . .
you’ve seen these listed in the Week 1 “Topics”. . . let’s have a closer look. . .
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. 3. 4. 5. culture as a primary concept comparative method as major approach holism as a primary theoretical goal fieldwork as a primary research technique
you’ve already seen the fourfold approach of American Anthropology. . . American Anthropology • cultural / social • physical • archaeology • linguistics
we’re going to have a closer look at. . . Prehistoric Cultures and its. . . • cultural / social • physical • archaeology • linguistics aspects
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique
Main Characteristics • “culture” is – learned – shared – transmitted from generation to generation – based on symbols – integrated
Main Characteristics • “culture” – learned some anthropologists – shared focus on the idea thatto – transmitted from generation culture involves generation “shared understanding” – based on symbols – integrated
Main Characteristics • “culture” • is not inherited (i. e. , is not biological) • is not “instinct”
Main Characteristics • “cultures” • are groups of people sharing a common heritage (and usually a common language)
for e. g. , Aztec Maya Inca Sophie D. Coe America's First Cuisines Austin: University of Texax Press, 1994. www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anthfood/aftexts. html#title
for e. g. , www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matext. html#title
for e. g. , www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matext. html#title
for e. g. , but “Mexico” includes many cultures. . . Aztec Toltec Mixtec Totonac Tarascan Zapotec Olmec Yaqui and others www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matext. html#title
for e. g. , more about this with “local cultures” (“microcultures”) below www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matext. html#title
Main Characteristics • “cultures” • are “integrated” -- an idea that was pioneered and emphasized by the “pioneer” anthropologist Ruth Benedict Ruth Fulton Benedict 1887 -1948 Patterns of Culture 1934
Ruth Fulton Benedict 1887 -1948 Patterns of Culture 1934
Main Characteristics • “cultures” • are integrated • Interact and change – the idea that some cultures (like “hunting and gathering” cultures, or the Amish) do not change is not correct
The Concept of Culture • Microculture – are smaller groups with distinct pattern of learned and shared behavior and thinking found within larger cultures such as ethnic groups in localized regions – some people like to think of these as “local cultures”
The Concept of Culture • Microculture – are smaller groups with distinct pattern of learned and shared behavior and thinking found within larger cultures such as ethnic groups in localized regions – some people like to think of these as “local cultures”
every region has its own local cultures, or microcultures. . .
“units of analysis” may include: – – – one person the family for e. g. , Middle America the Prehistoric community has all of these cultures. . . a region and more. . . “culture area” a culture / “subculture” • Ancient Middle America – – – Chamula Lancandon Tzotzil Tzeltal Zoque • • • Yaqui Otomi Tarascan Mixtec Zapotec • • • Olmec Toltec Aztec Teotihuacanos Tarahumara
indigenous groups with a population of more than 100, 000 http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_Mexico#Indigenous_groups_with_a_population_of_more_than_100. 2 C 000
indigenous groups with a population of more than 100, 000 http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples_of_Mexico#Indigenous_groups_with_a_population_of_more_than_100. 2 C 000
Aztec “Triple Alliance”. . . http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Aztec
“units of analysis” may include: – – – one person and the family just the Maya the community include all of these subcultures. . . a region and more. . . “culture area” a culture / “subculture” • Maya – – – Chamula Lancandon Tzotzil Tzeltal Zoque
every region has its own local cultures, or microcultures. . .
even Minnesota. . .
Minnesota Historical Society Press
even in places like Minnesota there are many “microcultures”. . . for e. g. , Anishinabe (known less appropriately as “The Ojibwa, ” and “The Chippewa”). . . and many groups have been in or near their present locality since prehistoric times
The Minnesota Ethnic Food Book
even in places like Minnesota there are many “microcultures”. . . for e. g. , Anishinabe (known less appropriately as “The Ojibwa, ” and “The Chippewa”). . . and many groups have been in or near their present locality since prehistoric times
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies” local groups generally strive to preserve –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) their cultural identity. . . –e. g. , Basques can often see that in the – and e. g. , you Kurds artifacts that they produce – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) local groups generally strive to preserve – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” their cultural identity with. . . • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies” language –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) food –e. g. , Basques religion – e. g. , Kurds – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals clothing cultural symbols
www. duluthnewstribune. com/articles/index. cfm? id=73293§ion=homepage
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies” local groups generally strive to preserve –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) their cultural identity. . . –e. g. , Basques can often see that in the – and e. g. , you Kurds artifacts that they produce – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals
you can probably see signs of this in your area. . . www. worldlicenceplates. com/usa/US_MNXX. html
these have prehistoric counterparts. . . www. worldlicenceplates. com/usa/US_MNXX. html
Clovis Point
Pictograph from Hegman Lake, Minnesota
and prehistoric items sometimes have modern counterparts Molinillo Ancient Mexican Hot Chocolate Frother http: //www. thegreenhead. com/2009/01/molinillo-traditional-mexican-hot-chocolate-frother. php
but context is always important What is this, for e. g. ?
but context is always important What is this, for e. g. ?
it’s a “spurtle” for stirring oatmeal and soups (in Scotland) http: //en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Spurtle
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies”. . . some areas of human activity tell –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) more than others. . . –e. g. , us Basques – e. g. , Kurds – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies”. . . food, for e. g. , is almost always a –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) key–e. g. , part. Basques of peoples’ cultural identity, – e. g. , Kurds back to their prehistoric often dating – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals past, and defining their history. . .
The Concept of Culture • microcultures can include ethnic groups within nations – e. g. , Anishinabe (Chippewa; Ojibwa) – e. g. , Irish “Travellers” • sometimes incorrectly called “Gypsies” –e. g. , Rom (Gypsies) often shows up in the –and e. g. , this Basques – e. g. , Kurds archeological record. . . – e. g. , Australian Aboriginals
Indians harvesting wild rice near Brainerd, 1905 Minnesota Historical Society
http: //www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anthfood/afwildrice. html#title
Maple Sugar Day's Place, Frozen Sap, Lake Mille Lacs Minnesota Historical Society
http: //www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/Buffalo/PB 07. html#title
Mrs. Day Granulating Maple Sugar, Lake Mille Lacs Minnesota Historical Society
Woman and Blueberries. Patrick Des. Jarlait (1912 -1972) Minnesota Historical Society
Bannock / Frybread Wikimedia
and this is the case for almost every group. . .
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach development and structure 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method – as a major approach to the study of human behavior – the comparative method compares things
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method – One form of comparative method was pioneered by Fred Eggan (University of Chicago) “Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison” American Anthropologist, 56: 743 -61 (1954)
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method – One form of comparative method was pioneered by Fred Eggan (University of Chicago) “Social anthropology and the method of controlled comparison” American Anthropologist, 56: 743 -61 (1954)
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • the comparative method compares things for e. g. .
Aztec Maya Inca Sophie D. Coe America's First Cuisines Austin: University of Texax Press, 1994. www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anthfood/aftexts. html#title
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method – Other methods. . . compare things regionally in an attempt to understand process
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method process – Other methods. . . essentially refers to how things change compare things regionally or how things came to be in an attempt to understand process the way they are now
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • comparative method – Other methods. . . anthropologists for e. g. , compare things regionally in an attempt to understand process
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • the comparative method compares things, for e. g. , process of domestication / civilization maize – Mexico wheat – Turkey rice – China manioc – Brazil millet – Africa
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • the comparative method compares things, for e. g. , process of domestication / civilization maize – Mexico wheat – Turkey rice – China manioc – Brazil millet – Africa
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • the comparative method compares things, for e. g. , process of domestication / civilization maize – Mexico wheat – Turkey rice – China manioc – Brazil millet – Africa
Compare. . . Main Characteristics • the comparative method compares things, for e. g. , process of domestication / civilization maize – Mexico wheat – Turkey rice – China manioc – Brazil millet – Africa
Origin of Domestication for Selected Plants Compare. . . wheat 10, 500 ybp maize 4, 200 ybp manioc 4, 200 ybp rice 7, 000 ybp millet 4, 000 ybp Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 342
Neolithic Chapter 14 Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. “Food Production” A Biocultural Revolution Time line for Ch. 14 Food Production Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 333
Neolithic one of the best places in the world to look at the process of plant domestication Tehuacán Time line for Ch. 14 Food Production Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 333
Compare. . . • Tehuacán Valley, Puebla, Mexico maize 4, 200 ybp Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8 th Ed. , p. 432
www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matehuac. html#title
www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/matehuac. html#title
Neolithic Time line for Ch. 14 Food Production Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 333
Neolithic “The Neolithic Revolution” “The New Stone Age” in Prehistoric Middle America this is known as The “Archaic” and sometimes they’re all referred to as “The Agriculture Revolution” Time line for Ch. 14 Food Production. Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 333
Compare. . . • Early Neolithic sites Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 349
REM: “The Neolithic Revolution” “The New Stone Age” in Prehistoric Middle America this is known as The “Archaic” and sometimes they’re all referred to as “The Agriculture Revolution”
Neolithic Time line for Ch. 14 Food Production Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 333
Compare. . . Mehrgarh One of the earliest Neolithic settlements of southern Asia, Pakistan Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 9 th Ed. , p. 352
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach development and structure 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal e. g. . 5. fieldwork asanother a primary research technique
Compare. . . comparing the “fall of civilization” around the world www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/video/Collapse. html#title
www. d. umn. edu/cla/faculty/troufs/anth 3618/video/Fall_Maya. html#title
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach 4. holism or the study of "humankind" as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique
Holism tries to put all of the pieces together. . . American Anthropology • cultural / social • physical (bio-physical) • archaeology • linguistics
let’s have a look at that on the “Anthropology and. . . Its Parts” chart. . .
NOTE: usually anthropologists read charts from the bottom up that has to do with the fact that in archaeology the oldest layers are at the bottom of a site and the newer ones are on top
NOTE: there are four levels. . . (REM: read from the bottom up)
HOLISM involves all four levels and all of the physical and cultural components combined
holism
holism
Anthropology
. . . and the two main divisions of Anthropology are bio-physical and socio-cultural. . .
Anthropology Bio-physical |
Anthropology Bio-physical | Socio-cultural
. . . and ultimately studies involve lots of subdisciplines and interdisciplinary studies. . .
Anthropology Bio-physical | Food Socio-cultural and Culture measuring excavating participant / observation
in some ways this chart business is all about Theory and that is important to the understanding of many aspects of Prehistoric Cultures
theory holism
theory holism and theory ultimately also includes the results of interdisciplinary study
and finally, we have the last main characteristic of anthropology. . .
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique -involving “participant observation”
note two terms in the “major characteristics of anthropology” listing. . .
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior 3. holism or the study of "humankind" as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, involving “participant observation”
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior holism or the study of "humankind" as a what’s the difference? 3. whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, involving “participant observation”
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior 3. holism or the study of "humankind" as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, =involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major 3. participant observation holism or the study of "humankind" as a data gathering technique — approach to the study of human behavior whole, as a primary theoretical goal (fieldwork) 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, =involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept Anthropologists use other tools. . . like questionnaires, interview schedules, comparative method as major psychological tests, documentary filming approach to the study of human behavior. . . but “participant observation” is a 3. holism or the study of "humankind" characteristic technique use by as a whole, as a primary theoretical anthropologists, especiallygoal cultural anthropologists 4. fieldwork as a primary (ethnologists) research 2. technique, =involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept Anthropologists use other tools. . . like questionnaires, interview schedules, 2. comparative method as major psychological tests, documentary filming approach to the study of human behavior. . . but “participant observation” is a 3. holism or the study of "humankind" characteristic technique use by as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal NOTE: anthropologists, especially culturalasanthropologists 4. fieldwork a primary researchare also ethnologists technique, =involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior 3. holism or the study of "humankind" as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, = involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. 2. 3. culture as a primary concept comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior = approach holism or the study "humankind" as a howofyou use information whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, = involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior 3. holism or the study of "humankind" as a whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, = involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics 1. culture as a primary concept 2. comparative method as major approach to the study of human behavior other tools include 3. holism or the study of "humankind" as a 4. fieldwork as a primary research like. . . goal whole, as athings primary theoretical technique, = involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information
Main Characteristics culture 1. • surveys and as aquestionnaires primary concept comparative method 2. • various laboratory analyses of as major a approach to the study of human behavior variety of artifacts holism 3. • ethological or the study oftechniques "humankind" as a research (animal studies in the field) whole, as a primary theoretical goal 4. fieldwork as a primary research technique, = involving tool “participant observation” = how you get information after Marion Nestle, Food Politics, Rev. Ed. , 2007, pp. 401 -405
• various studies of laboratory animals • biochemical research (“test tube”) • epidemiological research (populations) • clinical studies (medical) • and others after Marion Nestle, Food Politics, Rev. Ed. , 2007, pp. 401 -405
Anthropologists often like to use a research “technique” based on “unobtrusive measures”. . . (either in the field or elsewhere)
“unobtrusive measures” • analysis of available data • analysis of artifacts • simply observing • still and video photography and analysis of films and images • and others after Marion Nestle, Food Politics, Rev. Ed. , 2007, pp. 401 -405
but most of all (generally) Anthropologists LOVE. . .
Main Characteristics of Anthropology 1. the four fields of general anthropology 2. culture as a primary concept 3. comparative method as major approach 4. holism as a primary theoretical goal 5. fieldwork as a primary research technique -involving “participant observation”
and as I mentioned in the “. . . Note on Videos and Visual Anthropology”, we would LOVE to take you along with us around the world, but the next best thing we can do is bring the world to you in the form of films and videos. And we’ll do a lot of that (starting Week 1)
our first “field trip”. . .
our first “field trip”. . . http: //rosettapanglossia. longnow. org/wiki/index. php/Yanomam%C 3%B 6_Language
- Up/down counters
- Ff updown
- Alice keyboard with arrow keys
- Elijah kirtland temple
- Keys to content writing
- Andor györgy
- Andor planet
- Andor logic
- Andor györgy üzleti gazdaságtan
- Levophenol
- Andor györgy üzleti gazdaságtan
- Andor györgy üzleti gazdaságtan
- Whatever text
- Python andor
- Andor matlab
- Genus definition biology
- The scarlet letter chapter 7 summary
- The only force acting in a vertical projectile motion is
- Joint space vs cartesian space
- Space junk the space age began
- Camera space to world space
- Unscented trajectory chapter 5
- World space to screen space
- Anatomy of an arrow
- Spirit of the arrow booklets
- Downward arrow technique
- Energy transfer in a bow and arrow
- Pierce arrow logic
- O teorema da impossibilidade de arrow
- Sdd diagram
- Social choice voucher
- Italicized pronoun examples
- Parts of a bow and arrow
- How to make a range card
- First order consumer
- What do the arrows on a food web represent
- Solid yellow arrow
- What is 1/4 turn clockwise
- Slotted plastic tip on arrow
- Arrow mesh wifi
- Engage study activate lesson plan example
- What are decomposers
- Platypus food chain
- Aoa activity on arrow
- Electron configuration arrow diagram
- продуценты это
- Arrow of light knot
- Outside corner weld symbol
- C++ overload arrow operator
- Project arrow 204 sample test
- Roberts retractor uses
- Activity on arrow adalah
- Lap joint weld symbol
- Welding terminology and symbols
- Covalent bond comic strip
- Physics of a compound bow
- The arrow affected the aardvark
- Kwalipikasyon example
- Arrow aimer
- Checklist piper pa 28
- How to draw aoa diagram
- Click on the arrow
- Supercar.net
- Lane use control signal
- Arrow distributing corp likes to track inventory
- Arrow c
- Project star gleaming arrow
- What is the arrow pointing to?
- Native american arrow straightener
- Sinners in the hand of an angry god metaphors
- Arrow mesh wifi
- Inverse function in discrete mathematics
- Paramount triple sec
- Arrow circuit and dance communication
- Pleasure predicting sheet
- Which arrow below represents the direction of acceleration
- Arrow diagram
- Project arrow math test
- An arrow in a bow has 70j
- Editing and formatting text
- What is vpython
- Activity on arrow
- Red arrow
- Define inverse of a function with an arrow diagram
- Clipart
- Mc gayer
- Robin hood book report
- Juniper geode vs arrow 100
- Planktos greek
- Braylin
- Cla
- Class diagram for safe home security system
- What is the name of the structure labeled with the arrow?
- Rocket shape poem
- What is the arrow pointing to
- Find the perimeter of the composite figure
- Time flies like arrow fruit flies like banana
- Click the arrow
- Arrow checklist
- Glickmans classification
- Csi uniform drawing system
- Robin hood and the golden arrow
- Lake murray resort & marina
- Nutanix instanton
- Arrow pushing patterns
- Basic english for computing answer keys
- Ancel keys moodle
- Bar thinkers key
- Composite key in dbms
- Paired statement keys
- Until 1996 the sears tower
- Chairs and keys in railway
- 406 woodruff key dimensions
- Ancel keys
- Keys tuzish
- The father of renaissance painting
- Branching key example
- Lest we remember: cold boot attacks on encryption keys
- What is divine turnaround
- For identifying organisms through key usually
- Florida keys national marine sanctuary food web
- Flat footed rails
- Intechange keys
- Ibm 7 keys
- Ancel keys mediterranean diet
- 20 keys spanish
- 20 keys spanish
- A dug by bill keys
- What are the keys to effective internal marketing
- Keys to effective evangelism
- Home row key
- Nnnjkl