USE OF EASEMENTS IN OIL AND GAS LAW

  • Slides: 44
Download presentation
USE OF EASEMENTS IN OIL AND GAS LAW Oil, Gas and Mineral Land Titles

USE OF EASEMENTS IN OIL AND GAS LAW Oil, Gas and Mineral Land Titles Seminar June 5, 2014 Steve Bain and Jennifer Cadena* Welborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, PC 1125 17 th Street, Suite 2200 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 830 -2500 sbain@wsmtlaw. com jcadena@wsmtlaw. com www. wsmtlaw. com *prepared with the help of Maki Iatridis

Types of Surface Access EASEMENT Ø Non-possessory interest in real property Non-possessory: Use of

Types of Surface Access EASEMENT Ø Non-possessory interest in real property Non-possessory: Use of the land belonging to another Ø Real Property Ø Ø If you have an easement, you do not own the land, but have a right to use it for a particular purpose Ø “Typically” runs with the land 2

Types of Surface Access EASEMENT Ø The pipeline company needs an easement from the

Types of Surface Access EASEMENT Ø The pipeline company needs an easement from the surface owner Ø Ø Can be exclusive or nonexclusive Surface owner will limit ability to use surface Pipeline Ø Specified time Ø § “One year after the pipeline is no longer used” 3

Types of Surface Access LICENSE Ø Ø Not an interest in real property Yearly

Types of Surface Access LICENSE Ø Ø Not an interest in real property Yearly payment Personal, non-assignable Revocable 4

Licenses and pipelines 5

Licenses and pipelines 5

Licenses and pipelines Can a License be obtained for a pipeline? 6

Licenses and pipelines Can a License be obtained for a pipeline? 6

Licenses Yes, but who would want to? …. Licenses are hardly ever used 7

Licenses Yes, but who would want to? …. Licenses are hardly ever used 7

Easements General Examples Ø Ø Ø Pipelines Drainage Utilities Roads (RS 2477) Railroads (in

Easements General Examples Ø Ø Ø Pipelines Drainage Utilities Roads (RS 2477) Railroads (in patent) Access to development of minerals 8

Terminology and Types of Easements generally In Gross Ø Appurtenant Ø Ø Ø Purpose

Terminology and Types of Easements generally In Gross Ø Appurtenant Ø Ø Ø Purpose and intent determines If unclear, presumption is appurtenant Lewitz v. Porath Family Trust, 36 P. 3 d 120 at 122 (Colo. App. 2001) 9

Easements in Gross Ø Ø Ø Personal Interest No connection with the land Roads

Easements in Gross Ø Ø Ø Personal Interest No connection with the land Roads and utilities, typically 10

Easements Appurtenant Ø Ø Runs with the land Example 1: I own Parcel A

Easements Appurtenant Ø Ø Runs with the land Example 1: I own Parcel A and have an easement over Parcel B Ø You purchase Parcel A from me by deed, but it doesn’t mention an easement Ø When you purchase Parcel A, do you also get the easement? Ø A B 11

Easements Appurtenant Ø Ø Runs with the land Example 2: I own Parcel B

Easements Appurtenant Ø Ø Runs with the land Example 2: I own Parcel B which is “burdened” by an easement Ø You purchase Parcel B from me by deed, but it doesn’t mention an easement Ø When you purchase Parcel B, are you “burdened” by the easement? Ø A B 12

Easements Appurtenant Ø Creates “dominant” and “servient” estates Ø Dominant - Who benefits from

Easements Appurtenant Ø Creates “dominant” and “servient” estates Ø Dominant - Who benefits from the easement? Ø Servient – Who is serving the other? Who owns the property on which the easement is located? A B 13

Easements Appurtenant Ø Creates “dominant” and “servient” estates Ø Dominant - Who benefits from

Easements Appurtenant Ø Creates “dominant” and “servient” estates Ø Dominant - Who benefits from the easement? Ø Servient – Who is serving the other? Who owns the property on which the easement is located? A A (Dominant) B (Servient) 14

Easements Appurtenant Ø Dominant Ø Ø May do whatever is reasonably necessary to use

Easements Appurtenant Ø Dominant Ø Ø May do whatever is reasonably necessary to use easement Servient Can’t “unreasonably” interfere with easement Ø Although servient owner retains right to use easement area, this use must be consistent with easement owner’s rights Ø A B 15

Creation of Easements Ø Express Grant Ø Reservation Ø Ø Implication Necessity Ø Pre-existing

Creation of Easements Ø Express Grant Ø Reservation Ø Ø Implication Necessity Ø Pre-existing Use Ø Ø Prescription 16

Creation of Easements - Express Ø Ø Grant/Reservation Signed by landowner bound by easement

Creation of Easements - Express Ø Ø Grant/Reservation Signed by landowner bound by easement May be in a deed or separate agreement Mineral Deed example: Grantor deeds Grantee “all right, title and interest in and to all of the oil, gas and other minerals located in, on and under [Blackacre]. . . together with the right of ingress and egress at all times for the purpose of exploring, operating and developing said lands for oil, gas and other minerals and storing, processing, treating, transporting and marketing the same therefrom and to use so much of the surface of the land as is necessary or convenient for any such activities. . ” 17

Creation of Easements - Express Oil and Gas Lease may contain express grant Lessor

Creation of Easements - Express Oil and Gas Lease may contain express grant Lessor hereinafter leases to Lessee the oil and gas. . . “together with the right of ingress and egress and the right to conduct operations including, but not limited, to construct and maintain pipelines, telephone and electric lines, tanks, powers, ponds, roadways, plants, equipment, and structures thereon to produce, save and take care of said oil and gas. . ” Ø If not express, then implied 18

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Not expressed in writing Ø Implied by the

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Not expressed in writing Ø Implied by the transaction Ø Typically, by necessity or by preexisting use 19

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity (common law & by statute) Ø Ø

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity (common law & by statute) Ø Ø Ø Common ownership No other way to access land Must be current and continuing Lack of necessity terminates claim Payment A B 20

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity Ø Ø Ø Common ownership No other

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity Ø Ø Ø Common ownership No other way to access land Must be current and continuing Lack of necessity terminates claim Payment A B 21

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity Ø Ø Ø Common ownership No other

Creation of Easements - Implication Ø Necessity Ø Ø Ø Common ownership No other way to access land Must be current and continuing Lack of necessity terminates claim Payment A B 22

Creation of Easements - Implication Preexisting Use Ø Level of “necessity” may be less

Creation of Easements - Implication Preexisting Use Ø Level of “necessity” may be less than access to property A B 23

Creation of Easements - Prescription Ø Ø Unopposed Continuous trespass Statutory period of 18

Creation of Easements - Prescription Ø Ø Unopposed Continuous trespass Statutory period of 18 years Open, notorious, visible and adverse 24

Termination of Easements Voluntarily Agreement by parties Ø Quitclaimed by easement owner Ø Express

Termination of Easements Voluntarily Agreement by parties Ø Quitclaimed by easement owner Ø Express terms of easement instrument Ø Abandonment Voluntary, affirmative acts Ø Intent to abandon Ø 25

Scope Ø Trespass if easement holder exceeds “scope” of easement 26

Scope Ø Trespass if easement holder exceeds “scope” of easement 26

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Ø Facts: I own Parcel A in

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Ø Facts: I own Parcel A in fee Ø I deed you Parcel A, reserving the minerals Ø That deed does not mention an easement to access the surface of the property Ø Do I have an easement to develop the minerals? 27

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate YES Similar to an easement by necessity

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate YES Similar to an easement by necessity Without this implied easement, the mineral owner will not be able to develop his/her minerals 28

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Do I have an easement on the

Implied Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Do I have an easement on the surface to access adjoining land? NO, the easement is limited to developing my minerals – unless there is an express easement allowing me to access adjoining land 29

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate How much surface of the land can I

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate How much surface of the land can I (or a lessee) use to develop the minerals? 30

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Traditional Rule Ø May use surface to extent

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Traditional Rule Ø May use surface to extent reasonably necessary Ø Allows mineral owner to use the surface without obtaining surface owner’s permission or paying surface owner for compensation Ø Mineral owner may not destroy the surface Ø Can include drilling/operating wells and constructing roads and pipelines 31

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate But, what is reasonable? 32

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate But, what is reasonable? 32

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Modified Traditional Rule Ø No longer merely extent

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Modified Traditional Rule Ø No longer merely extent reasonably necessary Ø Focus on “accommodation” – there must be “due regard” for the surface owner and mineral owner Ø Ø You must attempt to “accommodate” each other The accommodation doctrine has been codified. C. R. S. § 34 -60 -127 Ø An operator may still enter upon and use that amount of the surface as is “reasonably necessary. ” 33

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate But, what is reasonable? 34

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate But, what is reasonable? 34

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Ø Due to the possible litigation as to

Easement for Benefit of Mineral Estate Ø Due to the possible litigation as to what is “reasonable, ” operators typically obtain surface use agreements Ø According to C. R. S. § 34 -60 -127: The standard of conduct set forth in this section shall not be construed to abrogate or impair a contractual provision binding on the parties that expressly provides for the use of the surface for the conduct of oil and gas operations or that releases the operator from liability for the use of the surface. 35

Surface Use Agreements 36

Surface Use Agreements 36

COGCC Definition SURFACE USE AGREEMENT shall mean any agreement in the nature of a

COGCC Definition SURFACE USE AGREEMENT shall mean any agreement in the nature of a contract or other form of document binding on the Operator, including any lease, damage agreement, waiver, local government approval or permit, or other form of agreement, which governs the operator’s activities on the surface in relation to locating a Well, Multi. Well Site, Production Facility, pipeline or any other Oil and Gas Facility that supports oil and gas development located on the Surface Owner’s property. 37

Damage Releases and Agreements Ø Ø Ø Ø Timely and hassle free access Provide

Damage Releases and Agreements Ø Ø Ø Ø Timely and hassle free access Provide tubing for corrals Cattle guards Grading and gravelling driveways Water supply wells Updating landowner’s abstract Dust suppression Repairing/upgrading fences* * James J. O’Malley & Kendor P. Jones, “Chained Gates and No Trespassing Signs: Dealing with Wary Landowners in a Brave New World, ” 51 Rocky Mt. L. Inst. 7 -1, 7 -23 (2005). 38

Operations Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Timing and coordination of drilling operations Segregation of

Operations Ø Ø Ø Ø Ø Timing and coordination of drilling operations Segregation of topsoils Location of production equipment Noise control Visual aesthetics Protection of water wells Fencing and protection of livestock Safety issues Indemnification and liability issues Reseeding and reclamation * James J. O’Malley & Kendor P. Jones, “Chained Gates and No Trespassing Signs: Dealing with Wary Landowners in a Brave New World, ” 51 Rocky Mt. L. Inst. 7 -1, 7 -24 to 7 -25 (2005). 39

Compatible Development and Surface Use Agreements Ø Ø Ø Ø Seismic work Access Construction

Compatible Development and Surface Use Agreements Ø Ø Ø Ø Seismic work Access Construction of locations for wells, tank batteries, meters and processing equipment Construction of roads, flowlines, gathering lines and power lines Compressor siting Cutting of fences and trees Workover operations* *See Christopher G. Hayes, “Surface Use Agreements, ” Severed Minerals, Split Estates, Rights of Access, and Surface Use in Mineral Extraction Operations, 15 -1, 15 -4 (Rocky Mt. Min. L. Fdn. 2005). 40

SUA Map 41

SUA Map 41

Setbacks Ø COGCC Setbacks Ø Ø In 2013, setbacks increased from 150– 350 feet

Setbacks Ø COGCC Setbacks Ø Ø In 2013, setbacks increased from 150– 350 feet to 500– 1, 000 feet Proposed Ballot Initiative Setbacks No. 85 – 1, 500 feet and no taking Ø No. 86 – 2, 000 feet and no taking Ø No. 87 – 1/2 mile and no taking Ø No. 88 – 2, 000 feet 42 Ø

Wind v. Oil & Gas Who leased first? Ø How soon is each likely

Wind v. Oil & Gas Who leased first? Ø How soon is each likely to be developed? Ø Can development be staggered? Ø Safety concerns Ø Height concerns Ø 43

Questions? Jennifer Cadena Steve Bain Welborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, PC 1125 17 th

Questions? Jennifer Cadena Steve Bain Welborn Sullivan Meck & Tooley, PC 1125 17 th Street, Suite 2200 Denver, CO 80202 (303) 830 -2500 sbain@wsmtlaw. com jcadena@wsmtlaw. com www. wsmtlaw. com 44