Urban Water Institute August 27 2015 The Colorado
Urban Water Institute August 27, 2015 The Colorado River: Drought Impacts the Lifeblood of the Southwest Bill Hasencamp Metropolitan Water District
Southern California’s Water Supply Sources LAKE SHASTA LAKE OROVILLE LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCTS (0. 5 MAF) Bay-Delta STATE WATER PROJECT (2. 0 MAF) COLORADO RIVER AQUEDUCT (1. 25 MAF) LOCAL 2. 0 MAF METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT SERVICE AREA
Colorado River Apportionments (Million acre-feet) Upper Basin States Lower Basin States 1. 04 . 49 3. 86 1. 71. 80 . 3. 2 4. 4 5. 1 2. 8 2. 4 1. 8 . 05. 02 . 84. 39 Apportionments Deliveries in 1990 s 1. 5 2. 5 Mexico
1931 Seven Party Agreement 1. Palo Verde ID (104, 500 acres valley) 2. Yuma Project (25, 000 acres) 3. (a) Imperial ID/Coachella Valley WD (b) PVID (16, 000 acres mesa) 4. Metropolitan WD Subtotal 5. Metropolitan WD Total MAF 3. 850 0. 550 4. 400 0. 700 5. 100
Quantification Settlement Agreement Quantified Water Budgets maf PVID Yuma Project IID CVWD MWD * Total 0. 42 (Average) 3. 10 0. 33 0. 55 4. 40 *Amount fluctuates based on PVID/Yuma Project use, unused IID and CVWD water
California 4. 4 Plan Implement Agricultural Conservation Measures with IID
California 4. 4 Plan Line the All-American, Coachella Canals
California 4. 4 Plan Incentivie PVID Farmers to Not Grow Crops
PVID Fallowing Program Yield Water Saved (TAF), Contract Year (August 1 – July 31) 180, 000 90% 45% 100% 25% 50% 100% 25% 160, 000 140, 000 5, 781 AF 50, 601 AF 120, 000 100, 000 122, 000 AF 80, 000 60, 000 120, 315 AF 112, 719 AF 40, 000 106, 504 AF 57, 685 AF 57, 065 AF 20, 000 - 129, 394 AF 121, 067 AF 62, 000 AF 32, 750 AF 31, 179 AF 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 Base Emergency Aug. 1, 2014 - Jul. 31, 2015 Aug. 1, 2015 - Jul. 31, 2016
Palo Verde Valley Community Improvement Fund Metropolitan provided $6 million in 2005 Managed by Volunteer Board Half of Funds Distributed Grants and loans Included small business development; job training programs MWD, PVID non-voting members Economic study concluded program is successful
Lake Mead Storage (ICS) Program MWD can store 1. 5 million acre-feet in Lake Mead Avoids costs and impacts of building new storage reservoirs
MWD Storage Balance (ICS) in Lake Mead 700 600 Thousand Acre-Feet 580 500 474 435 400 300 256 200 146 100 0 151 40 41 2006 2007 94 2008 2009 2010 2011 Calendar Year 2012 2013 2014
New Programs in 2015 Expanded exchange with SNWA 150, 000 in 2015 Expanded exchange with IID Up to 100, 000 in 2015 Boards to consider in September
Projected 2015 CRA Supplies 1. 2 New 2016 Exchanges 1. 0 ICS Delivery Million Acre-Feet (MAF) IID Exchange 0. 8 LCWSP PVID Fallowing Program 0. 6 0. 4 Canal Lining to MWD Canal Lining to SDCWA IID-SDCWA Transfer IID-MWD Conservation Basic Apportionment 0. 2 0. 0
Long-term Colorado River Challenges
Issue #1: Minimizing Colorado River Supply Losses
Quantification Settlement Agreement Quantified Water Budgets maf PVID Yuma Project IID CVWD MWD * Total 0. 42 (Average) 3. 10 0. 33 0. 55 4. 40 *Amount fluctuates based on PVID/Yuma Project use, unused IID and CVWD water
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 Priority 1, 2, 3(b) use over 420 TAF 14 20 13 20 12 20 11 20 10 20 09 20 08 20 07 20 06 20 20 *2014 Data is Preliminary. 05 04 Average = -74 TAF/year 03 Thousand Acre-Feet Agricultural Adjustments from Priority 1, 2, and 3(b) Use
300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 CVWD IID 14 20 13 20 12 20 11 20 10 20 09 20 08 20 06 07 20 *2014 Data is Preliminary. 20 05 20 20 20 04 Average = 81 TAF/year 03 Thousand Acre-Feet Annual Unused Apportionment from IID and CVWD
Thousand Acre-Feet Annual Net Adjustment to Metropolitan’s Basic Apportionment 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 -50 -100 -150 Average = 7 TAF/year 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 *2014 Data is Preliminary.
Water Supply Risks to Metropolitan Agriculture demand could grow along the Colorado River PVID: 16, 000 additional mesa acres CRIT: ~50, 000 AF of unused water rights Other areas could grow Water use increases would affect MWD’s supply Options to address increases include expanded fallowing, purchasing land
Issue #2: Dealing with Drought
May 2015: Wettest Month Ever Recorded in USA
Wettest May Ever for Parts of Colorado
Percent of Average Lake Powell 2015 April-July Runoff Monthly Forecasts 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Actual
Lake Powell Storage 2000 – 2015, May 2015 Projection vs. Actual x 1000 acre-feet 24, 000 19, 000 14, 000 Trigger for Reduced Releases 9, 000 4, 000 Sep- Sep- Sep- Sep- Sep 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Lake Mead Storage 2000 – 2015 23, 000 22, 000 21, 000 20, 000 19, 000 x 1000 acre-feet 18, 000 Surplus 17, 000 16, 000 15, 000 14, 000 13, 000 12, 000 11, 000 Shortage 10, 000 9, 000 8, 000 Dec- Dec- Dec- Dec- Dec 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Lake Mead Storage 2000 – 2015 23, 000 22, 000 21, 000 20, 000 19, 000 x 1000 acre-feet 18, 000 Surplus 17, 000 16, 000 15, 000 14, 000 13, 000 12, 000 11, 000 Shortage 10, 000 9, 000 8, 000 Dec- Dec- Dec- Dec- Dec 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
COLORADO RIVER NATURAL FLOW (AT LEE'S FERRY) 1906 -2008 103 Year Average = 15. 0 MAF 30 annual flow ANNUAL FLOW (MILLION ACRE-FEET) 25 20 15 10 5 0 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
COLORADO RIVER NATURAL FLOW (AT LEE'S FERRY) 1906 -2008 103 Year Average = 15. 0 MAF 30 annual flow ANNUAL FLOW (MILLION ACRE-FEET) 25 1905 -1922 Ave. = 16. 5 MAF 20 15 10 5 0 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Colorado River Apportionments (Million acre-feet) Upper Basin States Lower Basin States 1. 04 3. 86 1. 71 . 3 2. 8 4. 4 . 05 . 84 Apportionments 1. 5 Mexico
Colorado River Apportionments (Million acre-feet) Upper Basin States Lower Basin States . 73 3. 86 1. 711. 2 2. 7 . 3. 25 4. 4 1. 04 2. 8 2. 2 . 05. 04 . 84. 59 Apportionments Sustainable Deliveries? 1. 5 1. 3 Mexico
Lake Mead’s Future in Average Years
Augmentation? Conservation?
Summery Metropolitan, along with SDCWA, have implemented significant ag to urban transfers to help CA live within 4. 4 MAF Apportionment New tools have been developed to help manage those supplies in dry years Lake Mead ICS, etc. The Colorado River faces continued challenges to its water supply reliability that will require new and innovative agreements and actions
Bill Hasencamp 213 -217 - 6520 whasencamp@mwdh 2 o. com
Issue #3: Uncertain Future of the Salton Sea
QSA Provided Time to Restore Salton Sea Formed in 1905 Sustained by Ag drainage 50% Saltier than Ocean Salinity increase 1%/yr Soon too Salty for Fish Sea protected from QSA Transfer Impacts for 15 years IID to deliver 800 TAF of “mitigation water” to Salton Sea through 2017 Provided time for state to develop long-term solution
Frequent Fish Kills on Salton Sea
15 Year Period Nearing End; No Action Taken to Save Salton Sea State has done little to advance Sea’s restoration Issued Draft EIR Preferred Alternative $9 billion, $100 million O&M IID petitioned SWRCB to condition QSA transfers on Salton Sea restoration Resources agencies hosting meetings with stakeholders
QSA Legislation Authorized Potential Funding Source If consistent with restoration, mitigation water can be sold to DWR instead of delivered to Sea DWR, in turn, would sell water to MWD Proceed would benefit Salton Sea restoration $125 million of funds available Provide So. Cal. with up to 400, 000 af, easing drought State of California would need to initiate this DFG Code provision
Salton Sea Risks to QSA IID threatens to end transfers to SDCWA and CVWD without restoration plan If dust not sufficiently mitigated, lawsuits could block QSA transfers Working with QSA parties to encourage state to develop consensus Salton Sea solution
Summery Metropolitan, along with SDCWA, have implemented significant ag to urban transfers to help CA live within 4. 4 MAF Apportionment New tools have been developed to help manage those supplies Lake Mead ICS, etc. The Colorado River faces continued challenges to its water supply reliability that will require new and innovative agreements and actions
Bill Hasencamp 213 -217 - 6520 whasencamp@mwdh 2 o. com
- Slides: 52