Upper Cervical Spine Fractures Originally created by Daniel

Upper Cervical Spine Fractures Originally created by Daniel Gelb, MD January 2006 Updated by Robert Morgan, MD; November 2010

Upper Cervical Spine Fractures • • • Epidemiology Anatomy Imaging Characteristics Common Injuries Management Issues

$Epidemiology • 717 cervical spine fractures in 657 patients over 13 years • C$

Epidemiology • 717 cervical spine fractures in 657 patients over 13 years • C 1 and Hangman fractures found more in the young – Odontoid fractures evenly distributed • Younger patients have higher energy injuries • C 2 fractures most common The epidemiology of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine Ryan, M. D. ; Henderson, J. J. Injury, 1992, 23, 1, 38 -40

Upper Cervical Anatomy

Upper Cervical Anatomy • Biomechanically Specialized – Support of “large” Cranial mass – Large range of motion • Flexion/extension • Axial rotation • Unique osteological characteristics

Large Cranial Mass • Keel below the SNL is thick bone Roberts, DA; Doherty, BJ; Heggeness MH. Quantitative Anatomy of the Occiput and the Biomechanics of Occipital Screw Fixation Spine 23(10), 15 May 1998, pp 1100 -1107

Confluence of Issues • Bicortical screws in the occiput may enter the transverse sinus • Decreased risk below the superior nuchal line Roberts, DA; Doherty, BJ; Heggeness MH. Quantitative Anatomy of the Occiput and the Biomechanics of Occipital Screw Fixation Spine 23(10), 15 May 1998, pp 1100 -1107

Occipital Screw Mechanics Roberts, DA; Doherty, BJ; Heggeness MH. Quantitative Anatomy of the Occiput and the Biomechanics of Occipital Screw Fixation Spine 23(10), 15 May 1998, pp 1100 -1107

The course of the vertebral artery through C 1 and C 2 determines the possibility of placing screws for fixation of fractures and dislocations • C 1 lateral mass screws • C 1 -2 transarticular screws • C 2 pedicle/pars screws

Normal Vertebral Artery

Tortuous Vertebral Artery

C 1 - Atlas • No body • 2 articular pillars – Flat articular surface – Vertebral artery foramen • 2 arches – Anterior – Posterior • Vertebral artery groove

C 2 Anatomy • Dens – Embriological C 1 body – Base poorly vascularized – Osteoporotic • Flat C 1 -2 joints • Vertebral artery foramena – Inferomedial to superolateral

Trabecular Anatomy The trabecular anatomy of the axis Authors: Heggeness, M. H. ; Doherty, B. J. Source: Spine, 1993, 18, 14, 1945 -1949, UNITED STATES

Anatomy – The Ligaments • Allow for the wide ROM of upper C-spine while maintaining stability • Classified according to location with respect to vertebral canal – Internal: • Tectorial membrane • Cruciate ligament – including transverse ligament • Alar and apical ligaments – External • Anterior and posterior atlanto-occipital membranes • Anterior and posterior atlanto-axial membranes • Articular capsules and ligamentum nuchae

Atlanto-Axial Anatomy Tectorial Membrane

Atlanto-Axial Anatomy Tranverse Ligament C 1 -C 2 joint Occiput C 1 C 2 Alar Ligament

Atlanto-Axial Anatomy Facet for Occipital Condyle Transverse Ligament

Vertebral Artery Atlanto-Axial Anatomy

Radiographic Evaluation

Plain Radiographic Evaluation Lateral View Prevertebral Swelling Soft Tissue Shadow <6 mm at C 2 Concave/Flat Pre-dental space < 3 mm Atlanto-Occipital Joint Congruence Radiographic Lines* Open Mouth AP Distraction C 1 -2 Symmetry

Radiographic Diagnosis – Screening Lines Harris’s lines Powers’s Ratio

Radiographic Lines Harris’ Lines • Basion-Dental Interval (BDI) • Basion to Tip of Dens • <12 mm in 95% • >12 mm ABNORMAL • Basion-Axial Interval (BAI) • Basion to Posterior Dens • -4 -12 mm in 98% • >12 mm Anterior Subluxation • >4 mm Posterior Subluxation Harris et al, Am J Radiol, 1994

Radiographic Lines Powers’ Ratio • BC/OA – >1 considered abnormal • Limited Usefulness • Positive only in Anterior Translational injuries • False Negative with pure distraction Powers et al, Neurosurg, 1979

Radiographic Diagnosis CT Scan • Same rules as with plain films • Better visualization of craniocervical junction • Subluxation • Focal hematomas • Occipital condyle fractures • Dens fractures

Radiographic Diagnosis MRI Increased Signal Intensity in : • • C 0 -C 1 Joint C 1 -2 Joint Spinal Cord Cranio-cervical ligaments • Pre-vertebral soft tissues Dickman et al, J Neurosurg, 1991 Warner et al, Emerg Radiol, 1996

Upper Cervical Spine Fractures • Common Injuries – Occipital Condyle Fracture – Craniocervical sprain? – C 1 ring injuries – Odontoid Fracture – Hangman’s Fracture • Uncommon Injuries – Craniocervical Dislocation – Rotatory subluxation

$Occipital Condyle Fracture Type I Impaction Fracture Type II Extension of basilar skull fracture$

Occipital Condyle Fracture Type I Impaction Fracture Type II Extension of basilar skull fracture Type III ALAR ligament Avulsion Anderson , SPINE 1988 Tuli, NEUROSURGERY, 1997

Cranio-cervical Dislocation • • Antlanto-Occipital Joint Occipito-Cervical Joint Cranio-cervical Joint Atlanto-Axial Joint

• Cranio-cervical sprain (stage 1) may be treated nonoperatively

Cranio-cervical Dislocation Commonly Fatal Present 6 -20% of post mortem studies – Alker et al, 1978 – Bucholz & Burkhead, 1979 – Adams et al, 1992 50% missed injury rate 1/3 Neurological Worsening – Davis et al, 1993

Symptoms/Findings • Lower Cranial nerve deficits • Horner’s syndrome • Cerebellar ataxia • Bell’s cruciate paralysis • Contralateral loss of pain and temperature Wallenberg Syndrome

Check the Cranial Nerves! www. med. yale. com www. meddean. luc. edu

Cranio-cervical Dislocation • Treatment • Emergency Room • Collar/sandbag • Halo vest • Definitive • Posterior occipital cervical fusion • ALWAYS include C 1 and C 2

Atlas Fractures - Treatment Collar 1. Isolated anterior arch 2. Isolated posterior arch 3. Non-displaced Jefferson fracture

Atlas Fractures - Treatment Displaced <6. 9 mm • Halo vest * 3 mos Displaced >6. 9 mm • Halo traction (reduction) * several weeks followed by halo vest • Immediate halo vest • Posterior C 1 -2 fusion (unable to tolerate halo) After brace treatment complete confirm C 1 -2 stability Flexion/extension films C 1 -2 fusion for ADI > 5 mm

Transverse ligament avulsion • Bony avulsions may heal with nonoperative management • TAL rupture does not heal with nonoperative management and requires C 1 -C 2 arthrodesis

Atlas Fractures - Treatment Fusion options Gallie Post-op halo Brooks Jenkins Transarticular Screws C 1 lateral mass/C 2 pars-pedicle screws

$Odontoid Fractures Most common fracture of Axis (nearly 2/3 of all C 2 Fxs)$

Odontoid Fractures Most common fracture of Axis (nearly 2/3 of all C 2 Fxs) 10 – 20 % of all cervical fractures Etiology Bimodal distribution Young - high energy, multi-trauma Elderly - low energy, isolated injury (most common C-spine Fx elderly)

Elderly and the Odontoid • Platzer Studies • Harrop and Vaccaro – Elderly increased – 9/10 “union” pseudarthrosis rate( 12% v. – 5/10 postop halo 8%) – 1/10 perioperative death – Elderly tolerated pseudarthosis • Multiple series of high well(1/5) mortality rates – Elderly tolerated halo well – 10% mortality (4/41) Anterior screw fixation of odontoid fractures comparing younger and elderly – 22% complication rate patients. Authors: Platzer, P. ; Thalhammer, G. ; Ostermann, R. ; Wieland, T. ; Vecsei, V. ; Gaebler, C. Source: Spine, 2007, 32, 16, 1714 -1720, United States • Chapman studies – Elderly did not heal the odontoid fracture (4/17) – Elderly tolerated halo well (7/8) – 15% mortality (3/20) Nonoperative management of odontoid fractures using a halothoracic vest. Authors: Platzer, P. ; Thalhammer, G. ; Sarahrudi, K. ; Kovar, F. ; Vekszler, G. ; Vecsei, V. ; Gaebler, C. Source: Neurosurgery, 2007, 61, 3, 522 -9; discussion 529 -30, United States Posterior atlanto-axial arthrodesis for fixation of odontoid nonunions. Authors: Platzer, P. ; Vecsei, V. ; Thalhammer, G. ; Oberleitner, G. ; Schurz, M. ; Gaebler, C. Source: Spine, 2008, 33, 6, 624 -630, United States Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: early failure of nonsurgical treatment. Authors: Kuntz, C. , 4 th; Mirza, S. K. ; Jarell, A. D. ; Chapman, J. R. ; Shaffrey, C. I. ; Newell, D. W. Source: Neurosurg. Focus. , 2000, 8, 6, e 7, United States Efficacy of anterior odontoid screw fixation in elderly patients with Type II odontoid fractures. Authors: Harrop, J. S. ; Przybylski, G. J. ; Vaccaro, A. R. ; Yalamanchili, K. Source: Neurosurg. Focus. , 2000, 8, 6, e 6, United States

Fracture Classification Anderson and D’Alonzo Type I 2 % (2/49) Type II 50 -75 % (32/49) Type III 15 -25 % (15/49) Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. Authors: Anderson, L. D. ; D'Alonzo, R. T. Source: J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. , 1974, 56, 8, 1663 -1674, UNITED STATES

Subtypes of Type II Fractures • Type IIA and B are amenable to anterior fixation • Type IIC is not • Does not include part of facet, not a Type III Grauer, J. N et al Proposal of a modified, treatment-oriented classification of odontoid fractures. Spine J. , 2005, 5, 2, 123 -129

Acute Management • Spinal cord injury rare (17/226) • Airway compromise – 0/8 nondisplaced – 1/21 anterior displacement – 13/32 posterior displacement (2 deaths) Epidemiolgy of spinal cord injury after acute odontoid fractures JAMES S. HARROP, M. D. , ASHWINI D. SHARAN, M. D. , AND GREGORY J. PRZYBYLSKI, M. D. Neurosurgical Focus 2000 Don’t do flexion reductions! Closed management of displaced Type II odontoid fractures: more frequent respiratory compromise with posteriorly displaced fractures GREGORY J. PRZYBYLSKI, M. D. , JAMES S. HARROP, M. D. , AND ALEXANDER R. VACCARO, M. D. Neurosurgical Focus 2000

$Definitive Treatment Options Type 1 C-Collar beware unrecognized CCD Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture$

Definitive Treatment Options Type 1 C-Collar beware unrecognized CCD Evidence-based analysis of odontoid fracture management. Authors: Julien, T. D. ; Frankel, B. ; Traynelis, V. C. ; Ryken, T. C. Source: Neurosurg. Focus. , 2000, 8, 6, e 1, United States Type 3 C-Collar 10 -15% nonunion SOMI brace Halo Vest

$Treatment Options odontoid fracture Type 2 • • • C-Collar SOMI / Minerva Halo$

Treatment Options odontoid fracture Type 2 • • • C-Collar SOMI / Minerva Halo Vest Odontoid Screw C 1 -2 posterior fusion

Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation Indications • • • Displaced Type II, Shallow Type III Polytrauma patient Unable to tolerate halo-vest Early displacement despite halo-vest (Reduces in extension) Contraindications • • Non-reducible odontoid fracture (Reduces in flexion) Body habitus (Barrel chest ) Associated TAL injury Subacute injury (> 6 months) Reverse oblique (elderly) Roy-Camille Classification

Anterior Screw History • Note reduced dorsal cortex

Anterior Screw Technique • Skin incision at C 5 • Note slight extension • Missing key element in diagram (need to atraumatically obtain open mouth fluoroscopy) • Biplanar fluoroscopy Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. Authors: Apfelbaum, R. I. ; Lonser, R. R. ; Veres, R. ; Casey, A. Source: J. Neurosurg. , 2000, 93, 2 Suppl, 227 -236, UNITED STATES

Anterior Screw Technique • Need to enter body caudal portion of promontory • Midline for single screw placement Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. Authors: Apfelbaum, R. I. ; Lonser, R. R. ; Veres, R. ; Casey, A. Source: J. Neurosurg. , 2000, 93, 2 Suppl, 227 -236, UNITED STATES

Anterior Screw Technique • Critical to cross rostral cortex • Critical to use lag screw technique • Limited support for second screw Direct anterior screw fixation for recent and remote odontoid fractures. Authors: Apfelbaum, R. I. ; Lonser, R. R. ; Veres, R. ; Casey, A. Source: J. Neurosurg. , 2000, 93, 2 Suppl, 227 -236, UNITED STATES

One or Two Screws? • No significant difference biomechanically – Sasso – Graziano • No difference clinically – Apfelbaum – Jenkins

$Screw Mechanics A comparative study of fixation techniques for type II fractures of the$

Screw Mechanics A comparative study of fixation techniques for type II fractures of the odontoid process. Authors: Graziano, G. ; Jaggers, C. ; Lee, M. ; Lynch, W. Source: Spine, 1993, 18, 16, 2383 -2387, UNITED STATES

Screw Mechanics • 13 cadavers • Load to failure – Extension-deflection – 450 oblique • No difference between one and two screws • Failure mode is screw pullout from body • Anatomic reduction without comminution Biomechanics of odontoid fracture fixation. Comparison of the one- and two-screw technique. Authors: Sasso, R. ; Doherty, B. J. ; Crawford, M. J. ; Heggeness, M. H. Source: Spine, 1993, 18, 14, 1950 -1953, UNITED STATES

Apfelbaum Clinical Outcomes • 147 patients – 129 (117) <6 months – 18 > 6 months • 88% fusion rate – Recent fractures – Horizontal and posterior oblique – No difference between one or two screws • 25% fusion rate in remote fractures • 10% implant complication – Screw pullout of C 2 body • 1% perioperative mortality – 6% within 30 days

Jenkins Clinical Outcomes • 42 patients • 8. 5 month followup • 15% nonunion rate (plain radiographs) • 5% perioperative mortality • 10% 3 month mortality • Mal-reduction A clinical comparison of one- and two-screw odontoid fixation. Authors: Jenkins, J. D. ; Coric, D. ; Branch, C. L. , Jr Source: J. Neurosurg. , 1998, 89, 3, 366 -370, UNITED STATES • Incorrect entry point

Posterior Odontoid Stabilization

Posterior Odontoid Stabilization • Options – Posterior wiring • Up to 25% pseudoarthrosis • Halo vest necessary (? ) Dickman JNS 1996, Grob Spine 1992 – Transarticular screw fixation • Magerl and Steeman Cerv Spine 1987 • Reilly et al, JSD 2003 – C 1 lateral mass - C 2 pars/pedicle/lamina screw

Wiring Techniques Biomechanical comparison of C 1 -C 2 posterior arthrodesis techniques. Authors: Papagelopoulos, P. J. ; Currier, B. L. ; Hokari, Y. ; Neale, P. G. ; Zhao, C. ; Berglund, L. J. ; Larson, D. R. ; An, K. N. Source: Spine, 2007, 32, 13, E 363 -70, United States

$Trans-articular Screw Technique Primary posterior fusion C 1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and$

Trans-articular Screw Technique Primary posterior fusion C 1/2 in odontoid fractures: indications, technique, and results of transarticular screw fixation Authors: Jeanneret, B. ; Magerl, F. Source: J. Spinal Disord. , 1992, 5, 4, 464475, UNITED STATES

Wiring Mechanics Biomechanical comparison of C 1 -C 2 posterior arthrodesis techniques. Authors: Papagelopoulos, P. J. ; Currier, B. L. ; Hokari, Y. ; Neale, P. G. ; Zhao, C. ; Berglund, L. J. ; Larson, D. R. ; An, K. N. Source: Spine, 2007, 32, 13, E 363 -70, United States

Posterior Wiring Outcomes

C 1 C 2 Segmental Instrumentation Posterior C 1 -C 2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Authors: Harms, J. ; Melcher, R. P. Source: Spine, 2001, 26, 22, 2467 -2471, United States

pedicle Pars Trans-articular C 2 pars/pedicle

Harm’s Mechanics • LC 1 -PC 2 performs similar to transarticular screws • Transarticular screws with graft stiffest construct • Interspinous graft behaves as intact specimen regarding lateral bending Hott et al: Biomechanical comparison of C 1 -2 posterior fixation techniques. J Neurosurg Spine 2: 175 -181. 2005

Harm’s Outcomes • 37 patients • 100% fusion • 1 wound infection Posterior C 1 -C 2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Authors: Harms, J. ; Melcher, R. P. Source: Spine, 2001, 26, 22, 2467 -2471, United States • • • 102 patients 98% fusion rate Navigation Allograft/BMP 2 dissection VA injury 1 neuropathic pain (C 2 root sacrifice) • 4 wound infections Stabilization of the atlantoaxial complex via C-1 lateral mass and C-2 pedicle screw fixation in a multicenter clinical experience in 102 patients: modification of the Harms and Goel techniques. Authors: Aryan, H. E. ; Newman, C. B. ; Nottmeier, E. W. ; Acosta, F. L. , Jr; Wang, V. Y. ; Ames, C. P. Source: J. Neurosurg. Spine, 2008, 8, 3, 222229, United States

Posterior Fusion Takehome • Catastrophic failures reported for trans-articular screws alone • Trans-articular screws with wired bone graft is stiffest construct – Requires intact C 1 lamina – Requires reducible C 1 -2 facets – Requires favorable anatomy • Gallie wiring is inadequate without two supplemental screws • No advantage of either wiring construct with two transarticular screws • Harm’s technique is most flexible • Think about hooks?

$Traumatic Spondylolisthesis Axis (Hangman’s Fracture) Second most common fracture of axis 25% of C$

Traumatic Spondylolisthesis Axis (Hangman’s Fracture) Second most common fracture of axis 25% of C 2 injuries Most common mechanism of injury is MVA

Hangman’s Fracture Younger age group (Avg 38 yrs) Usually due to hyperextension-axial compression forces (windshield strike) Neurologic injury seen in only 5 -10 % (acutely decompresses canal) Traditional treatment has been Halo-vest Collar adequate if < 6 mm displaced Coric et al JNS 1996

Where Cranio-cervical meets Subaxial Levine AM, Edwards CC: The management of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 217 -226

Hangman Fracture • Intact disk defines Type I • Halo treatment difficult with torn disk (types II and III) • Exercise caution Dysphagia and Dysphonia Resolved immediately with halo adjustment

Hangman’s Fracture Treatment Types II and III Treatment Posterior – Open reduction and C 1 -C 3 fusion – Direct pars repair and C 2 -C 3 fusion Anterior – C 2/C 3 ACDF with instrumentation

$Atlanto-axial Rotatory Subluxation Fuentes et al Traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation with odontoid fracture: case$

Atlanto-axial Rotatory Subluxation Fuentes et al Traumatic atlantoaxial rotatory dislocation with odontoid fracture: case report and review. Spine 2001; 26(7) 830 -834

Atlanto-axial Rotatory Subluxation • • Traction/halo Posterior fusion Lateral facetectomy, reduction, fusion Transoral facetectomy, reduction, fusion

Halo Immobilization

$Halo • Frank Bloom – Apparatus for stabilization of facial fractures – “Maxillofacial surgeon”$

Halo • Frank Bloom – Apparatus for stabilization of facial fractures – “Maxillofacial surgeon” (actually a Navy orthopaedic surgeon) – World War II: treated pilots with inwardly displaced facial fractures – Similar design • Incomplete ring with 3 pin tiara The history of the halo skeletal fixator O'Donnell, P. W. ; Anavian, J. ; Switzer, J. A. ; Morgan, R. A. Spine, 2009, 34, 16, 1736 -1739

The Basics The halo fixator Bono, C. M. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. , 2007, 15, 12, 728 -737

Pin Placement The halo fixator Bono, C. M. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg. , 2007, 15, 12, 728 -737

Halo in Elderly • Tashijan J. Trauma 2006 – 78 patients, age > 65 yo – Type II or III odontoid fractures – Increased early morbidity and mortality • Compared with treatment using operative fixation or rigid collar • Van Middendorp JBJS 2009 – 239 patients – All ages in halo – No increased risk of pneumonia or death in patients >65 years old If you would like to volunteer as an author for the Resident Slide Project or recommend updates to any of the following slides, please send an e-mail to ota@aaos. org Halo vest immobilization in the elderly: a death sentence? Majercik, S. ; Tashjian, R. Z. ; Biffl, W. L. ; Harrington, D. T. ; Cioffi, W. G. J. Trauma, 2005, 59, 2, 350 -6; discussion 356 -8 Incidence of and risk factors for complications associated with halovest immobilization: a prospective, descriptive cohort study of 239 patients van Middendorp, J. J. ; Slooff, W. B. ; Nellestein, W. R. ; Oner, F. C. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. , 2009, 91, 1, 71 -79

Thank You If you would like to volunteer as an author for the Resident Slide Project or recommend updates to any of the following slides, please send an e-mail to ota@aaos. org E-mail OTA about Questions/Comments • Return to • Spine • Index