Updates on the evaluation program for the PROTEACH

Objectives • Building the evaluation team from among the PROTEACH group members. • The

Objectives • Providing an assessment of an existing processes and measuring the assimilation of

The model The Object of the Research Team Evaluation 1. Evaluation of every college

1. Each institute’s evaluation of its MITs • Internal evaluation analysis of the MITs

2. Broad topics that focus on unique populations or content questions • To broaden

List of topics/Population of Interest Topic/Population of Interest 1. Interns and novice teachers 2.

The two-day seminar in July • Focus on building the evaluation tools. • Defining

The tools • Interns and New Teachers (PRE) : – Questionnaire – Interview guidelines

The tools • The interfaces with educational administration and policymakers’ attitudes towards successful induction

What is next • First pilot and refine the tools • Data collection using

Slides: 13

Download presentation

Updates on the evaluation program for the PROTEACH project Oded Mcdossi Research authority The MOFET Institute

Objectives • Building the evaluation team from among the PROTEACH group members. • The evaluation team: Dalia, Haya, Rinat, Ainat & Oded.

Objectives • Providing an assessment of an existing processes and measuring the assimilation of the project ideas. • Both in-depth (within MIT’s) and breadth (between MIT’s) • Three-dimensions model of evaluation.

The model The Object of the Research Team Evaluation 1. Evaluation of every college with its To be performed by the college team particular MITs Broad topics focusing on unique Inter-institutional research groups populations or content questions formed from among the group members according to the researchers' fields of interest Comparative analysis of multiple Leading coordinating team cases (MITs) 2. 3.

1. Each institute’s evaluation of its MITs • Internal evaluation analysis of the MITs of each college. – An example: “Makif Vav” MIT of Kaye collage • The college team will determine the goals of the evaluation (Yet, need for standardization)

2. Broad topics that focus on unique populations or content questions • To broaden the outlook to other contexts. – generalize – examine change over time effectively • Collaborations are based researchers' fields of interest. on the

List of topics/Population of Interest Topic/Population of Interest 1. Interns and novice teachers 2. Mentors and Accompanying Teachers 3. Interfaces with Educational administration (school /local authority / inspectorate and Ministry of Education)

The two-day seminar in July • Focus on building the evaluation tools. • Defining the evaluation goals for the population/topic based on the pedagogical program. • Proposing measures/indicators for evaluating each goal based on existing tools in the field.

The tools • Interns and New Teachers (PRE) : – Questionnaire – Interview guidelines • Mentors and Accompanying Teachers (PRE) : – Questionnaire – Interview guidelines

The tools • The interfaces with educational administration and policymakers’ attitudes towards successful induction process. – Interview guidelines (almost done)

What is next • First pilot and refine the tools • Data collection using a digital platform – During December. • Analyzing the data and writing an evaluation report (first results in Exeter…)

Suggestions and comments are welcome

Thank you for your attention!