UNMET NEED FOR SEATS IN NEW 2015 2019

UNMET NEED FOR SEATS IN NEW 2015 -2019 CAPITAL PLAN INCLUDING CLASS SIZE AND OVERCROWDING DATA FOR COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT 25 Leonie Haimson, Class Size Matters July 2014

School Utilization Rates at critical levels • Citywide, schools have become more overcrowded over last six years. More than 480, 000 students citywide are in extremely overcrowded buildings. • Elementary schools avg. building utilization “target” rates at 97. 4%; median at 102%. High schools are not far behind at 95. 2%. • High ES rates in all boroughs, including D 10 and D 11 in the Bronx 108% and 105. 6%, respectively. • In Queens, D 24 (120. 6%), D 25 (109. 7%), D 26 (110%), D 27 (106. 1%), and D 30 (107. 3%) all extremely overcrowded. • At the MS level, D 20 in Brooklyn, D 24, and D 25 in Queens have building utilization rates over 95%. • Queens high school buildings have avg. utilization rate of 110. 7% and Staten Island high school buildings 103. 2%. Data source: Blue Book target utilization rates 2012 -2013

Average Utilization Rates City-Wide 2012 -2013 100% 97. 4% 95. 2% 95% 90% *Calculated by dividing building enrollment by the target capacity 85% 80. 9% 80% 75% 70% Elementary Schools Middle Schools Source: 2012 -2013 DOE Blue Book High Schools

Proposed capital plan vs. needs for seats • Proposed capital plan has (at most) 38, 754 seats – and this if Cuomo’s “Smart School” bond act is approved. (806 more seats funded only for design) • Plan admits real need of 49, 245 (though doesn’t explain how this figure was derived). • DOE’s consultants project enrollment increases of 60, 000 -70, 000 students by 2021 • At least 30, 000 seats needed to alleviate current overcrowding for just those districts that average above 100%. • Conclusion: real need for seats at least 100, 000.

Proposed capital plan vs. needs for seats part II • These figures do not capture overcrowding at neighborhood level, including schools with K waiting lists, or need to expand pre-K, reduce class size, restore cluster rooms, or provide space for charters as required in new state law. • Does not capture need to replace trailers with capacity of more than 10, 890 seats. • Though DOE counts only 7, 158 students attending class in TCUs, actual number is far higher & likely over 10, 000. • Also, DOE utilization figures underestimate actual overcrowding according to most experts and Chancellor, who has appointed a “Blue Book” taskforce to improve them. • Revised utilization formula should be aligned to smaller classes, dedicated rooms for art, music, special education services, and more.

Class sizes have increased for six years in a row • Despite provisions in 2007 state law requiring NYC reduce class sizes, classes in K-3 in 2013 -2014 largest since 1998; in grades 4 -8 largest since 2002. • K-3 average class size was 24. 9 (Gen Ed, inclusion & gifted classes) compared to 20. 9 in 2007, increase of 19%. • In grades 4 -8, the average class size was 26. 8, compared to 25. 1 in 2007 –increase of 6. 8%. • HS “core” academic classes, class size average 26. 7, up slightly since 2007. (Yet DOE’s measure of HS class sizes is inaccurate and their methodology changes, so estimates cannot be relied upon. ) • Averages do NOT tell the whole story – as more than 330, 000 students were in classes of 30 or more in 2013 -2014. • There were 40, 268 kids in K-3 in classes of 30 or more in 2013 -2014 – an increase of nearly 14% compared to the year before. • The number of teachers decreased by over 5000 between 2007 -2010, according to the Mayor’s Management Report, despite rising enrollment.

K-3 Class sizes are the largest since 1998 General ed, CTT and gifted: data from IBO 1998 -2005; DOE 2006 -2013 24. 90 24. 86 24. 46 23. 89 23. 25 22. 90 22. 38 22. 10 21. 6821. 55 21. 40 21. 2821. 12 21. 0020. 90 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

4 th – 8 th grade Class sizes largest since 2002 Gened, CTT and gifted: data from IBO 1998 -2005; DOE 2006 -2013 28. 1 27. 5 27. 2 27. 4 27. 0 26. 8 26. 6 26. 7 26. 4 26. 3 25. 9 25. 8 25. 6 25. 1 25. 3 1998/99 1999/00 2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10 2010 -11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14

Total no. of teachers dropped by 5, 000 since 2007 -8 data source: Mayor's Management Report 79, 109 79, 021 76, 795 74, 958 73, 844 72, 787 FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13

Class sizes in CSD 25 have increased in grades K-3 by 16. 4% since 2006 and are now far above C 4 E goals 26 25. 2 24. 9 24. 5 24 24. 9 24. 0 23. 9 Students per Section 23. 6 22. 9 22. 6 22. 1 22 C 4 E goals 21. 6 21. 4 21. 5 21. 4 21 21. 0 20. 9 20. 7 Citywide actual D 25 20. 3 20. 1 20 19. 9 4 13 00 0 _x 7_ 20 12 -1 3 -1 12 100 0 _x 7_ 20 1 0 - 920 0 _x 00 0 7_ 20 _x 00 06 _ 20 06 _ 00 _x 11 9 08 - 8 07 - e in el as _B 00 8 _x 0 10 18 Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006 -2013, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

CSD 25’s class sizes in grades 4 -8 have increased by 6. 4% since 2006 and are now far above C 4 E goals 30 28. 4 Students per Section 28 27. 7 26 26. 9 26. 6 26. 4 28. 1 27. 7 27. 6 26. 8 26. 7 26. 6 26. 3 25. 8 25. 6 25. 3 25. 1 24. 8 24. 6 24 23. 8 C 4 E target 23. 3 22. 9 22 D 25 20 4 _x 00 0 7_ 20 13 -1 3 7_ 20 00 0 _x _x 00 0 7_ 20 1 12 1 - -1 12 1 7_ 20 00 0 _x _x 00 0 7_ 20 10 09 -1 -1 9 06 _ 00 _x 06 _2 00 _x 20 00 08 - 78 e in el as _B 00 8 0 18 _x 0 Citywide actual Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006 -2013, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

Class sizes city-wide have increased in core HS classes as well, by 2. 3% since 2007, though the DOE data is unreliable* 27 26. 6 26. 5 26 26. 1 26 26. 7 26. 5 26. 4 26. 2 26. 3 25. 7 C 4 E Target 25. 5 Citywide Actual 25. 2 25 24. 8 24. 5 24 2007 -08 2008 -09 2009 -10 2010 -11 2011 -12 2012 -13 2013 -14 *DOE’s class size data is unreliable & their methodology for calculating HS averages have changed year to year Data sources: DOE Class Size Reports 2006 -2013, 2008 DOE Contracts for Excellence Approved Plan

CSD 25 Schools with large class sizes • At the Kindergarten level, there are nine schools in CSD 25 with an average class size of 25 or more, according to DOE’s November 2013 report. • In grades 1 -3, there are 15 schools in CSD 25 with at least one grade level averaging 30 students per class or more. • In grades 4 -8, 21 schools have at least one grade level with an average class size of 30 or more.

S. 9 . . 30 E. . 30 AR VI R R 30 LE C TE S N U EE A. . . 30 20 Y BA Q 31 16 9 9 KL 30 P. S. 02 . . . 31 S. U L AS . . . 30 P. PA M IS C 31 9 21 O TH . . . 31 P. S. P. 7 EW 31 10 FR AN . . . E 32 S. 9 07 R D ST FR D 25 Kindergarten P. S. AN AL ST. 02 P. ED. . S. 4 A 16 ND J. . R 4 P. S. QU EW EE 16. . . P. 9 B NS S. A V 02 Y T. . . 1 ER P. S. ED R 10 WA. . . 7 P. R D S. TH 02 OM. . . 0 AS J P. . S. OH P. 12 N B S. 0 Q O. . . 20 U E P. 9 C S. LE EN 07 AR S P. V S. 9 F 16 RA IE. . . N 5 ED CI S IT. . . H K. B. . . S. AT 32 P. E 34 33 33 32 32 31 31 30 30 29 29 4 AT 31 3 ST 33 32 32 31 31 30 30 29 29 28 02 . . . 33 S. D D 25 2 nd Grade P. 2 25 ST AR 19 03 26 2 03 W S. P. . . . G IN EW R AN D S N . . . 27 P. S. P. ED 31 1 S. P. 02 4 U SH EE U Q IS C 25 02 S N 32 U EE S. P. FL 4 15 16 3 S. J. . . 25 S. Q . . B. P. S. P. AN FR . . . 25 P. 02 9 K. . 32 S. H IT ED D AR AS M O N S . . E. D AR EE U Q ED W TH 9 07 02 2 S. P. S. 02 1 0 12 . . . ST 25 P. 5 W ED . . . 32 16 21 . 0 AS M O TH . . . S. E AR VI LE C AT ST 25 S. . S 07 S. P. 2 20 9 P. S. P. 03 27 . 1 ST 34 33 33 32 32 31 31 30 30 29 AT E ST L. . . AL W AD C S. P. 28 27 27 26 26 25 25 24 24 . S 32 . 0 14 . 2 . S Examples of schools in CSD 25 with large class sizes, K-3 D 25 1 st Grade 31 30 30 D 25 3 rd Grade 33 32 31 30 30

School Utilization Rates at critical levels • Citywide, elementary schools avg. building utilization rates are at 97. 4%; the median utilization rate is at 102%, high schools are not far behind at 95. 2%. • In eleven districts, elementary school average above 100%; 20 districts average above 90%. • High schools in Queens (110. 7%) and Staten Island (103. 2%) average above 100%. • At the MS level, D 20 in Brooklyn, D 24, and D 25 in Queens have building utilization rates over 95%. • There are more than 30, 000 seats just to bring those districts to 100% utilization. Data source: Blue Book target utilization rates 2012 -2013

# of Seats currently needed to bring buildings to 100% or less # of Seats Needed in all districts with building utilization rates higher than 100% at HS level # of Seats Needed in all districts with ES building utilization rates higher than 100% 8, 000 7, 295 6, 000 7, 000 5, 318 5, 000 6, 000 3, 912 4, 000 5, 000 4, 000 3, 000 2, 279 2, 000 1, 929 1, 822 1, 637 1, 231 1, 451 1, 476 3, 000 2, 000 1, 000 518 189 0 0 D 11 D 15 D 20 D 22 D 24 D 25 D 26 D 27 D 30 D 31 QUEENS HS *These figures are the difference between capacity & enrollment in the organizational target # in 2012 -2013 Blue Book Source: 2012 -2013 DOE Blue Book STATEN ISLAND HS

Average Utilization Rates in CSD 25 compared to City-Wide 2012 -2013 --CSD 25 Elementary Schools are at 109. 7% utilization, well above citywide average 120% 110. 7% 109. 7% 100% 97. 4% 98. 6% 95. 2% 80. 9% 80% *Calculated by dividing building enrollment by the target capacity 60% 40% 20% 0% District 25 Citywide Elementary Schools District 25 Middle Schools Citywide Middle Schools Queens High Schools Citywide High Schools Source: 2012 -2013 DOE Blue Book 1, 637 ES Seats and 7, 295 HS Seats needed to reach 100% building utilization

Over-utilized ES and MS buildings in CSD 25 and Queens HS • There are 21 buildings that host elementary and 3 buildings that host middle school students in CSD 25 that are at 100% utilization or more. The seat need for these schools is more than 2, 700 students. • At 26 over-utilized Queens HS buildings, there is a seat need for more than 13, 000 students. • Please note that the seat need here is higher because it takes into account all buildings that are over-utilized (100% or more) rather than the need averaged across the district.

21 ES Buildings are over-utilized in CSD 25 180% 170% 162% 160% 154% 141% 140% 135% 133% 120% 128% 123% 122% 118% 117% 116% 114% 111% 110% 109% 107% 106% 100% 80% 60% 40% 20% EC C O ) R T EC AB C LE (@ FR P. S. AN 32 KL IN AV E) P. P. S. S. 32 21 TR P. AN S. SP 24 O R TA BL E P. S. 18 4 P. S. 15 4 P. S. 29 P. S. 16 9 P. S. 22 P. P. S. S. 12 22 9 TR P. AN S. SP 20 9 O R TA BL E P. S. 10 7 P. S. 20 P. S. 16 3 P. S. 21 4 P. S. 12 0 AN SP -( P. S. 24 4 16 3 TR P. S. S. P. S. 24 TR AN SP O 24 2 R TA BL E 0% *2, 358 ES seats needed to reach 100% building utilization

3 MS buildings are over-utilized in CSD 25 124% 119% 118% 114% 109% 106% 104% 99% 94% J. H. S. 185 *365 MS seats needed to reach 100% building utilization J. H. S. 237 J. H. S. 168

AR TS FO R FR ES T H AN AN IL M C LS ID D B IS D LE US LEW HS C. (O IS O LL L N HS EG U E TN X C FL AM ) BE U N SH PU JA S M I BA NG IN H Y N S. C SI R D. A N E F R EW. K H D S O EN Q C Z A U O EE JO VIA O H M NE ER D TI N S H S O S YC N N G B H O AT M OW HS LO IG EW M H N SC. M NE G AY H I I S TO TH SLA HO DD L O O N E L H EA MA D C (O /HS L LT S IT Y DL H A. SC ED HS IC IE ISO (N ) BA EW TO NC N C C E V ) W AL N S S OC AU SE EC H R N O S EA D N TE Q HA DA U R. . SC E R EN RIS. EN L AI FO S H SS QU R VO S E AN E C G H C NS LO H S E B S A FO CH CA AL E A D R IN RT EM D FO ER Y R SC HS Q M N H A S JO TIO OO H S L N H O N TE F A C TE D Q AC HIL AM H U LC S H EE H. , R N L ES S YO Q S H RI IB. C U U AR T H H EE IG N S M H G T SC ON S& W NS O M HS HO D H SC EN O F IL I S' OR L C L H LE O T S AD HE MP LE S E W X IL RS CIE LI AM HIP NC ES C SC. B H O R YA OL N T H S R FO 200% 190% 175% 180% 156%154%152% 150%148% 160% 144% 135%134%133% 130%127%126% 140% 124%121%120% 119%118%117%116% 110%108%106% 120% 102%101% 100% 26 Queens High School Buildings are over-utilized 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% *13, 331 HS seats needed to reach 100% building utilization

New Seats in Capital Plan and DOE Enrollment Projections for CSD 25 4, 000 3, 730 3, 500 3, 228 3, 000 2, 500 2, 309 2, 252 2, 000 1, 500 1, 000 500 0 ES and MS New Seats from Capital Plan FY 2015 -2019 Enrollment Projections, Statistical Forecasting 2011 -2021 Enrollment Projections, Grier Partnership 2011 -2021 Housing Starts, Estimated Growth 2012 -2021 ~5, 480 to 5, 982 new students by 2021 according to enrollment projections but only 2, 309 seats are being added.

2014 Kindergarten Wait Lists in CSD 25 • According to DOE, the wait list for zoned Kindergarten spots in 2014 is smaller citywide than in 2013, with 1, 242 zoned students on wait lists as of April 21, 2014. • 19 of 32 school districts currently have at least one school with a waiting list. • 63 schools have zoned wait lists: 20 in Brooklyn, 17 in Queens, 11 in Manhattan, 11 in The Bronx, and 4 in Staten Island. • DOE less transparent than ever: the number of zoned students for particular schools if less than 10 is not revealed – and methodology for creating wait lists unexplained. • Over 7, 000 families got none of their choices but unclear how many were put on wait list for their zoned school. • There were two school in District 25 with waiting lists: PS 24 Andrew Jackson (25 students) and PS 120 (1 -9 students).

Number of students in CSD 25 trailers • In CSD 25, according to the 2012 -2013 TCU Report, there are 11 TCUs at seven elementary schools: PS 22 (1 TCU, 60 students), PS 24 (2 TCUs, 109 students), PS 32 (1 TCU, 36 students), PS 79 (2 TCUs, 68 students), PS 129 (2 TCUs, 90 students), PS 163 (2 TCUs, 97 students), and PS 193 (1 TCU, no students listed). • There at least 460 students enrolled in these TCUs that need to be replaced.

Number of students in Queens HS trailers • At the high school level, there at least 38 TCUs at eight Queens high schools: John Adams, Bayside, Cardozo, Richmond Hill, William Bryant, John Bowne, Francis Lewis, and Jamaica Learning Center. • All but John Adams HS did not have enrollment figures listed in the report and are not counted in DOE stats on students attending class in trailers. • There are 68 classrooms in these 38 TCUs and the total capacity is 1, 984 across the 8 HS. None of these students are included in the 7, 158 total that DOE reports attend classes in TCUs.

New seats need for CSD 25 • Capital Plan allocates just 2, 309 seats for FY 2015 -2019 for CSD 25. • To reduce overcrowding, and bring building utilization to 100% at the elementary school level and middle school level, more than 2, 700 seats are needed. • If the DOE’s enrollment projections are accurate, at least 5, 480 seats are needed in the district to meet the enrollment projections for the next decade (2011 -2021). • To remove elementary and middle school students from trailers, another 460 seats are needed to eliminate the need for trailers in elementary and middle schools across CSD 25. • Therefore, at least 8, 600 elementary and middle school seats are needed beyond what the FY 2015 -2019 Capital Plan has for CSD 25.

Unmet need critical in Queens high schools • More than 7, 200 seats in Queens HS are needed to reduce present overcrowding and bring building utilization to 100%. • These figures underestimate actual level of overcrowding, according to most principals. • About 2, 000 seats are needed to remove Queens high school students from schools with trailers (from capacity figures). • DOE consultants project an increase in Queens high school enrollment of 12, 567 - 12, 980 by 2021. • Yet only 2, 802 Queens HS seats proposed in five-year plan, a shortage of more than 17, 000 seats.

New charter provisions passed in state budget • Any charter co-located in a NYC school building cannot be evicted and has veto powers before they leave the building – even if they are expanding and squeezing out NYC public school students. • This includes any charter co-location agreed to before 2014 – including the three Success charter schools approved right before Bloomberg left office. • Any new or charter school in NYC adding grade levels must be “provided access to facilities” w/in five months of asking for it. • If they don’t like the space offered by the city, they can appeal to the Commissioner King, who is a former charter school director and has never ruled against a charter school. • NO FISCAL IMPACT statement or analysis accompanying this bill. • In addition, the state will provide all charter schools with per-pupil funding increases, amounting to $500 over the next 3 years and provide them funding for pre-K.

Charter space provisions ONLY apply to NYC • Upstate legislators fought off making charters eligible for state facilities funds – which would have been better for NYC. • Yet legislators did not block these onerous provisions for NYC , where we have the most expensive real estate & the most overcrowded schools in the state. • If the DOE doesn’t offer charter schools free space, the city must pay for a school’s rent in private space or give them an extra 20 percent over their operating aid every year going forward. • After the city spends $40 million per year on charter rent, the state will begin chipping in 60% of additional cost.

How many charters will there be entitled to free space? • We have 183 charters in NYC, 119 in co-located space. • 22 new charters are approved to open next year or the year after, all entitled to free space. • 52 additional charter schools left to approve until we reach the cap raised in 2010 – with legislative approval – all entitled to free space. • Any new or existing co-located charter can also be authorized to expand grade levels through HS and will be entitled to free space. • DOE will be paying $5. 4 M in annual rent for four years for 3 Success Academy schools that only have 484 students next year – at a cost of $11, 000 per student. • This doesn’t count the unknown renovation costs in these 3 schools, also paid for by the city.

Blue book data & Utilization formula inaccurate & underestimates actual level of overcrowding • Class sizes in grades 4 -12 larger than current averages & far above goals in city’s C 4 E plan & will likely force class sizes upwards • Doesn’t require full complement of cluster rooms or special needs students to have dedicated spaces for their mandated services • Doesn’t properly account for students now housed in trailers in elementary and middle schools. • Doesn’t account for co-locations which subtract about 10% of total space and eat up classrooms with replicated administrative & cluster rooms. Small schools use space less efficiently • Instructional footprint shrank full size classroom only 500 sq. feet min. , risking building code/safety violations at many schools as 20 -35 sq feet per student required. • Special ed classrooms defined as only 240 -499 sq ft, thought State Ed guidelines call for 75 sq ft per child with special needs; classrooms this small would allow only 3 - 7 students.

Comparison of class sizes in Blue book compared to current averages & Contract for excellence goals Grade levels UFT Contract class size limits Target class sizes in "blue book" Current average class sizes How many sq ft per student C 4 E class Size required in classrooms goals according to NYC building code Kindergarten 25 20 23 19. 9 35 1 st-3 rd 4 th-5 th 32 32 20 28 25. 5 26 19. 9 22. 9 20 20 28 27. 4 22. 9 20 30 26. 7* 24. 5 20 30 (Title I) 6 th-8 th 33 (non-Title I) HS (core classes) 34 *DOE reported HS class sizes unreliable

Some Recommendations • 38, 000 seats in capital plan is too low, esp. given existing overcrowding, projected enrollment, pre. K expansion, class size reduction, new mandates to provide charter schools with space • Also very low as compared to Mayor’s plan to create or preserve 200, 000 affordable housing units. • Council should expand the seats in five year capital plan. • Commission an independent analysis by City Comptroller, IBO or other agency. • Adopt reforms to planning process so that schools are built along with housing in future through mandatory inclusionary zoning, impact fees etc. • Over half of all states and 60% of large cities have impact fees, requiring developers to pay for costs of infrastructure improvements, including schools.