Unit 3 Monetary Policy Targets 452011 Monetary Policy

  • Slides: 61
Download presentation
Unit 3: Monetary Policy Targets 4/5/2011

Unit 3: Monetary Policy Targets 4/5/2011

Monetary Policy • tools • instruments • targets • goals

Monetary Policy • tools • instruments • targets • goals

Monetary Policy Tools • open market operations • discount rate • required reserve ratio

Monetary Policy Tools • open market operations • discount rate • required reserve ratio

Monetary Policy Instruments • reserve aggregates o reserves o non-borrowed reserves o monetary base

Monetary Policy Instruments • reserve aggregates o reserves o non-borrowed reserves o monetary base • interest rates o short-term interest rates § federal funds rate

Monetary Policy Instruments policy instrument – variable that responds to tools and indicates the

Monetary Policy Instruments policy instrument – variable that responds to tools and indicates the stance (easy or tight) of monetary policy

Monetary Policy Targets • monetary aggregates o M 1 o M 2 • interest

Monetary Policy Targets • monetary aggregates o M 1 o M 2 • interest rates o inflation rate o long-term interest rate o short-term interest rate

Monetary Policy Targets intermediate target – stands between the instruments and goals of monetary

Monetary Policy Targets intermediate target – stands between the instruments and goals of monetary policy

Monetary Policy Goals • price stability • high employment • economic growth • financial

Monetary Policy Goals • price stability • high employment • economic growth • financial market stability • interest-rate stability • foreign exchange stability

Monetary Policy Targets • monetary targeting • inflation targeting • targeting with no nominal

Monetary Policy Targets • monetary targeting • inflation targeting • targeting with no nominal anchor

Monetary Targeting monetary targeting – central bank announces targets for the annual growth rate

Monetary Targeting monetary targeting – central bank announces targets for the annual growth rate of a monetary aggregate (e. g. , 5% growth of M 1 or 6% growth of M 2)

Monetary Targeting United States • money supply growth targets announced o Arthur Burns in

Monetary Targeting United States • money supply growth targets announced o Arthur Burns in 1975 o often missed targets • focus on non-borrowed reserves o Paul Volker in 1979 • won’t use monetary aggregates as a guide o Greenspan in 1993

Monetary Targeting Japan • “forecasts” for M 2 + CDs announced in 1978 •

Monetary Targeting Japan • “forecasts” for M 2 + CDs announced in 1978 • performance better than the Fed 1978 -1987 • switched to a tighter monetary policy 1989 o partially blamed for the “lost decade”

Monetary Targeting Germany • focus on “central bank money” (early 1970 s) • can

Monetary Targeting Germany • focus on “central bank money” (early 1970 s) • can restrain inflation in the longer run o even when targets are missed • reason for the relative success o clearly stated monetary policy objectives o central bank communication with public

Monetary Targeting • elements o flexible o transparent o accountable • advantages o immediate

Monetary Targeting • elements o flexible o transparent o accountable • advantages o immediate signals (inflation expectations) o immediate accountability • disadvantages o strong and reliable relationship required § goal variable : targeted aggregate

Inflation Targeting • medium-term numerical target for inflation o public announcement • institutional commitment

Inflation Targeting • medium-term numerical target for inflation o public announcement • institutional commitment to price stability o primary, long-run goal of monetary policy • many variables are used in making decisions • increased transparency of the strategy • increased accountability of the central bank

Inflation Targeting • New Zealand (since 1990) o inflation decreased o high growth, lower

Inflation Targeting • New Zealand (since 1990) o inflation decreased o high growth, lower unemployment • Canada (since 1991) o inflation decreased o slightly higher unemployment • United Kingdom (since 1992) o inflation close to target o high growth, lower unemployment

Inflation Targeting • advantages o more variables examined o easily understood o reduces time-inconsistency

Inflation Targeting • advantages o more variables examined o easily understood o reduces time-inconsistency problem o transparency and accountability • disadvantages o delayed signaling o too much rigidity o more output fluctuations possible o less GDP growth during disinflation

Inflation Targeting

Inflation Targeting

Inflation Targeting

Inflation Targeting

Inflation Targeting

Inflation Targeting

Targeting with no Explicit Anchor • no explicit nominal anchor o no overriding concern

Targeting with no Explicit Anchor • no explicit nominal anchor o no overriding concern for the Fed • used by the Fed recently • “just do it” approach • forward looking behavior • periodic “preemptive strikes” • goal: prevent inflation from getting started

Targeting with no Explicit Anchor • advantages o uses many sources of information o

Targeting with no Explicit Anchor • advantages o uses many sources of information o reduces time-inconsistency problem o demonstrated success • disadvantages o lack of transparency and accountability o strong dependence on people in charge § preferences, skills, trustworthiness o inconsistent with democratic principles

Monetary Policy Strategies

Monetary Policy Strategies

Money Supply Target Interest Rate, i Ms* • M d fluctuates between M d

Money Supply Target Interest Rate, i Ms* • M d fluctuates between M d 1 and M d 2 • With M-target at M*, i fluctuates between i 1 and i 2 i * Md 2 i 1 Md Md 1 M* Quantity of Money, M

Interest Rate Target Interest Rate, i M 1* Ms M 2* i 2 •

Interest Rate Target Interest Rate, i M 1* Ms M 2* i 2 • M d fluctuates between M d 1 and M d 2 • To set i-target at i* Ms fluctuates between M 1 and M 2 i * Md 2 i 1 Md Md 1 M* M 2 Quantity of Money, M

Nonborrowed Reserves Target Federal Funds Rate id Rs iff 3 1 iff 1 R

Nonborrowed Reserves Target Federal Funds Rate id Rs iff 3 1 iff 1 R d 3 iff 2 ier R d 2 Rn R d 1 Quantity of Reserves, R

Federal Funds Rate Target Federal Funds Rate id Rs 1 iff* R d 3

Federal Funds Rate Target Federal Funds Rate id Rs 1 iff* R d 3 ier R d 2 R n 1 R d 1 R n 3 Quantity of Reserves, R

Monetary Policy Targets Criteria for choosing targets 1. measurability 2. controllability 3. ability to

Monetary Policy Targets Criteria for choosing targets 1. measurability 2. controllability 3. ability to predictably affect goals Interest rates aren’t clearly better than Ms on 1 & 2 because hard to measure and control real interest rates.

Monetary Policy Instruments Criteria for choosing instruments 1. measurability 2. controllability 3. ability to

Monetary Policy Instruments Criteria for choosing instruments 1. measurability 2. controllability 3. ability to predictably affect targets Reserve aggregates and interest rates about equal on 1 & 2. If intermediate target is Ms, then reserve aggregate is better for 3.

Fed Policy Procedures Early years of the Fed (1913 -1921) • discount loans the

Fed Policy Procedures Early years of the Fed (1913 -1921) • discount loans the primary policy • real bills doctrine o thoroughly discredited

Fed Policy Procedures Discovery of OMO (1921 -1929) • Federal Reserve needed more revenue

Fed Policy Procedures Discovery of OMO (1921 -1929) • Federal Reserve needed more revenue • invested in income earning securities • open market operations o accidentally discovered

Fed Policy Procedures Great Depression (1929 -1941) • raised discount rate too late o

Fed Policy Procedures Great Depression (1929 -1941) • raised discount rate too late o wanted to temper stock boom o but worried about hurting others • bank failures reduced money supply o Fed didn’t understand o M 1 contracted 25% o Fed believed was expanding Ms • Fed didn’t act as LOLR

Fed Policy Procedures Reserve requirements (1933 -1941) • Fed got reserve requirements power o

Fed Policy Procedures Reserve requirements (1933 -1941) • Fed got reserve requirements power o Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 • Fed RR power expanded o Banking Act of 1935 • excess reserves hurt monetary policy • raised reserve requirements for control o Aug. 1936, Jan. 1937, May 1937 o caused 1937 -1938 recession o “double dip” of Great Depression

Fed Policy Procedures Pegging of interest rates (1942 -1951) • skyrocketed government spending o

Fed Policy Procedures Pegging of interest rates (1942 -1951) • skyrocketed government spending o wanted to finance WWII cheaply • pegged interest rates o Treasury bills: 3/8% o Treasury bonds: 2. 5% • if interest rates on bonds rose o Fed made open market purchases o interest rates would then fall • rapid growth in MB & money supply

Fed Policy Procedures Targeting money market (1950 s, 1960 s) • intuitive judgment o

Fed Policy Procedures Targeting money market (1950 s, 1960 s) • intuitive judgment o based on feel for money market o i. e. , interest rates • William Martin was Fed chairman • pro-cyclical policy (for M) o Y↑ → i↑ → MB↑ → M↑ o π↑ → πe↑ → i↑ → MB↑ → M↑ o monetarists criticized (e. g. , Friedman)

Definitions procyclical – economic quantity positively correlated with state of the economy; up during

Definitions procyclical – economic quantity positively correlated with state of the economy; up during booms, down during busts countercyclical – economic quantity negatively correlated with state of the economy; down during booms, up during busts

Fed Policy Procedures Targeting monetary aggregates (1970 s) • wasn’t really monetary targeting o

Fed Policy Procedures Targeting monetary aggregates (1970 s) • wasn’t really monetary targeting o actually used funds rate • Arthur Burns was Fed chairman • still pro-cyclical policy (for M) o Y↑ → i↑ → MB↑ → M↑ o π↑ → πe↑ → i↑ → MB↑ → M↑ o monetarists criticized (e. g. , Friedman)

Fed Policy Procedures New operating procedures (1979 -1982) • de-emphasis on fed funds rate

Fed Policy Procedures New operating procedures (1979 -1982) • de-emphasis on fed funds rate • non-borrowed reserves main instrument • still used interest rates • Paul Volcker was Fed chair • not serious about monetary aggregates o avoided blame for high interest rates • anti-inflation strategy

Fed Policy Procedures De-emphasis of M aggregates (1982 -1993) • de-emphasis of monetary aggregates

Fed Policy Procedures De-emphasis of M aggregates (1982 -1993) • de-emphasis of monetary aggregates • borrowed reserves main instrument o discount loans • pro-cyclical policy (for M) o Y↑ → i↑ → DL↑ → MB↑ → M↑ • breakdown in M: GDP relationship

Fed Policy Procedures Federal funds targeting again (1993 -present) • monetary aggregates no longer

Fed Policy Procedures Federal funds targeting again (1993 -present) • monetary aggregates no longer used o Greenspan testified before Congress • federal funds rate main instrument/target o FFR target announced starting 1994

Fed Policy Procedures Other considerations • pre-emptive strikes against inflation o 1994, 1999, 2004

Fed Policy Procedures Other considerations • pre-emptive strikes against inflation o 1994, 1999, 2004 • pre-emptive strikes against recessions o 1996, 1998, 2001, 2007 o 1998: Long Term Capital Management • international considerations o M↑ in 1985 to lower exchange rate o M↓ in 1987 to raise exchange rate

Active vs. Passive Policy Advantages of Active Policy • recessions cause economic • Employment

Active vs. Passive Policy Advantages of Active Policy • recessions cause economic • Employment Act of 1946 o “It is the continuing policy and responsibility of the Federal Government to … promote full employment and production. ” • AD-AS model o monetary policy can stabilize economy o fiscal policy can stabilize economy

Active vs. Passive Policy Advantages of Passive Policy • long & variable lags to

Active vs. Passive Policy Advantages of Passive Policy • long & variable lags to policies o Milton Friedman emphasized this o inside (implementation) lag § time between shock and response § takes time to recognize shock § takes time to implement policy o outside (effectiveness) lag § time it takes policy to affect economy o may de-stabilize when takes effect

Active vs. Passive Policy automatic stabilizers – policies that stimulate or depress the economy

Active vs. Passive Policy automatic stabilizers – policies that stimulate or depress the economy when necessary without any deliberate policy change (designed to reduce lags) Automatic stabilizer examples • income tax • unemployment insurance • welfare

Forecasting Because policies act with lags, policymakers must predict future conditions. Generating forecasts •

Forecasting Because policies act with lags, policymakers must predict future conditions. Generating forecasts • leading economic indicators o data series fluctuating before economy o Index of Leading Economic Indicators § includes 10 data series • macroeconometric models o large models w/ estimated parameters o forecasts response to shocks & policies

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Forecasting

Unemployment rate Forecasting

Unemployment rate Forecasting

Standard deviation Stability 4. 0 3. 5 3. 0 2. 5 Volatilit y of

Standard deviation Stability 4. 0 3. 5 3. 0 2. 5 Volatilit y of GDP 2. 0 1. 5 1. 0 0. 5 Volatility of Inflation 0. 0 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005

Rules vs. Discretion rules – policymakers announce in advance how policy will respond in

Rules vs. Discretion rules – policymakers announce in advance how policy will respond in various situations, and commit themselves to following through discretion – as events occur and circumstances change, policymakers use their judgment and apply whatever policies seem appropriate at the time

Rules vs. Discretion Arguments for rules • distrust of policymakers & political process o

Rules vs. Discretion Arguments for rules • distrust of policymakers & political process o misinformed politicians o politicians & society interests different • time inconsistency o destroys policymaker credibility time inconsistency – policymakers have an incentive to renege on a previously announced policy once others act

Monetary Policy Rules • constant money supply growth rate • target growth rate of

Monetary Policy Rules • constant money supply growth rate • target growth rate of nominal GDP • target the inflation rate • the Taylor Rule

Monetary Policy Rules Constant money supply growth rate • advocated by monetarists • stabilizes

Monetary Policy Rules Constant money supply growth rate • advocated by monetarists • stabilizes AD only if velocity is stable • Friedman k-percent rule o 4% per year o g. M + g. V = g. P + gy o g. P = 0, g. V = -1%, gy = 3%, k% = g. M= 4%

Monetary Policy Rules Target growth of nominal GDP • automatic • increase money growth

Monetary Policy Rules Target growth of nominal GDP • automatic • increase money growth o when nominal GDP grows under target • decrease money growth o when nominal GDP growth over target

Monetary Policy Rules Target the inflation rate • automatic • decrease money growth o

Monetary Policy Rules Target the inflation rate • automatic • decrease money growth o when inflation rate over target • increase money growth o when inflation rate below target • many countries practice inflation targeting o but allow a little discretion

Monetary Policy Rules The Taylor Rule • automatic • target the federal funds rate

Monetary Policy Rules The Taylor Rule • automatic • target the federal funds rate • based on o inflation rate o GDP gap (actual & full-employment) o inflation gap (actual & target) • proposed by John Taylor

Taylor Rule iff = inflation rate + equilibrium real fed funds rate target +

Taylor Rule iff = inflation rate + equilibrium real fed funds rate target + 0. 5(inflation gap) + 0. 5(GDP gap) • iff ≡ nominal federal funds rate target • π ≡ inflation rate • equilibrium real federal funds rate = 2 • inflation gap = π – 2 • GDP gap = 100(y – yn)/yn o percent real GDP is below natural rate

Taylor Rule iff = π + 2 + 0. 5(π – 2) + 0.

Taylor Rule iff = π + 2 + 0. 5(π – 2) + 0. 5(GDP gap) • if π = 2% & y = yn, iff = 4% • π↑ by 1% → iff↑ by 1. 5% • (y – yn)↑ by 1% → iff↑ by 0. 5%

Percent Taylor Rule 12 Actual 10 8 6 4 Taylor’s Rule 2 0 1987

Percent Taylor Rule 12 Actual 10 8 6 4 Taylor’s Rule 2 0 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002 2005