Unemployment 1 Unemployment The concept of unemployment is

Unemployment

1. Unemployment The concept of unemployment is somewhat ambiguous since in theory virtually anyone would be willing to be employed in return for a generous enough compensation package. →Economists define unemployment in terms of an individual’s willingness to be employed at some prevailing market wage. l u（unemployment rate）=U/L • Government statistic: U (temporary layoff waiting to be recalled , actively search for work in the previous week or month )

l Note: Limitations of unemployment rate data →For a number of reasons, they do not necessarily provide an accurate reflection of the economic hardship that members of a group are suffering.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Individuals who are not actively searching for work, including those who search unsuccessfully and then gave up, are not counted among the unemployed. e. g. , discouraged worker. Unemployment statistics tell us nothing about the earnings levels of those who are employed. A substantial fraction of the unemployed come from families in which other earners are present and the unemployed are often not the primary source of their family support. Unemployed receive some income support such as government unemployment compensation. Unemployment rate data tell us little about the fraction of the population that is employed.

失業率-按年齡分 單位 ： % 項目別 失 93 94 業 率 95 96 97 全部 男性 女性 全部 男性 女性 4. 41 4. 84 3. 81 4. 10 4. 28 3. 86 3. 84 4. 10 3. 48 3. 87 3. 99 3. 71 3. 84 3. 96 3. 67 10. 08 13. 16 7. 56 9. 89 10. 47 9. 43 9. 99 11. 71 8. 55 9. 66 10. 87 8. 69 10. 36 11. 87 9. 12 １５～１９歲 11. 42 11. 50 11. 33 10. 78 11. 14 10. 32 9. 22 8. 84 9. 67 8. 54 6. 77 10. 31 9. 47 10. 24 8. 63 ２０～２４歲 9. 85 13. 52 7. 02 9. 75 10. 32 9. 32 10. 11 12. 28 8. 40 9. 85 11. 67 8. 44 10. 53 12. 24 9. 20 4. 08 4. 49 3. 53 3. 73 4. 04 3. 31 3. 71 4. 21 3. 06 4. 05 4. 38 3. 64 3. 83 4. 15 3. 44 ２５～２９歲 6. 01 6. 56 5. 36 5. 53 6. 50 4. 42 5. 90 6. 60 5. 13 6. 17 7. 21 5. 07 6. 22 7. 14 5. 28 ３０～３４歲 3. 82 4. 25 3. 24 3. 44 3. 81 2. 94 3. 86 4. 76 2. 71 3. 81 3. 72 3. 91 3. 66 3. 90 3. 37 ３５～３９歲 3. 05 3. 48 2. 44 2. 70 2. 58 2. 85 2. 69 3. 21 1. 99 2. 93 3. 10 2. 74 3. 15 2. 22 ４０～４４歲 3. 41 3. 81 2. 83 3. 15 3. 37 2. 83 2. 23 2. 41 1. 97 3. 13 3. 55 2. 51 2. 52 2. 50 3. 21 3. 60 2. 52 3. 10 3. 50 2. 38 2. 40 2. 49 2. 23 2. 10 2. 22 1. 88 2. 34 2. 41 2. 22 ４５～４９歲 3. 24 3. 57 2. 73 3. 34 3. 60 2. 95 2. 52 2. 33 2. 81 2. 26 2. 43 2. 00 2. 74 3. 04 2. 31 ５０～５４歲 3. 81 4. 41 2. 71 3. 07 3. 75 1. 79 2. 32 2. 99 1. 15 2. 20 2. 61 1. 49 2. 19 2. 38 1. 88 ５５～５９歲 2. 97 3. 36 2. 08 2. 71 2. 99 2. 01 2. 59 2. 35 3. 17 1. 86 1. 55 2. 54 2. 24 1. 99 2. 75 0. 10 0. 13 - 0. 39 0. 53 - 0. 26 0. 24 0. 30 0. 05 0. 06 - 0. 23 0. 21 總 計 １５～２４歲 ２５～４４歲 ４５～６４歲 ６５歲及以上 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業率-按教育程度分 單位 ： % 項目別 失 93 全 部 總 計 男 性 94 女 性 全 部 男 性 業 率 95 女 性 全 部 男 性 96 女 性 全 部 男 性 97 女 性 全 部 男 性 女 性 4. 41 4. 84 3. 81 4. 10 4. 28 3. 86 3. 84 4. 10 3. 48 3. 87 3. 99 3. 71 3. 84 3. 96 3. 67 國中及以下 4. 16 4. 88 2. 91 4. 08 4. 74 2. 92 3. 30 3. 70 2. 61 3. 40 3. 79 2. 72 3. 62 4. 00 2. 94 國小及以下 2. 93 3. 47 2. 24 2. 76 3. 34 2. 02 2. 05 2. 14 1. 94 2. 01 2. 29 1. 65 2. 63 2. 29 3. 09 國中 5. 19 5. 86 3. 72 5. 15 5. 67 3. 97 4. 26 4. 68 3. 32 4. 38 4. 66 3. 77 4. 30 4. 99 2. 80 高中（職） 4. 89 5. 36 4. 29 4. 51 4. 01 4. 27 4. 56 3. 89 4. 27 4. 44 4. 06 高中 4. 75 4. 92 4. 44 4. 37 4. 29 4. 51 3. 97 4. 12 3. 73 3. 87 3. 79 4. 01 4. 27 4. 29 4. 25 高職 4. 94 5. 52 4. 25 4. 27 4. 59 3. 88 4. 36 4. 72 3. 93 4. 39 4. 67 4. 07 3. 99 3. 97 4. 01 大專及以上 4. 09 4. 18 3. 99 3. 92 3. 57 4. 35 3. 82 3. 99 3. 61 3. 82 3. 70 3. 95 3. 78 3. 85 3. 70 大學及以上 3. 87 4. 27 3. 36 3. 99 2. 98 5. 23 4. 07 4. 15 3. 96 4. 07 3. 94 4. 22 4. 28 4. 24 4. 33 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

2. Types of Unemployment and Their Causes (1)Frictional Unemployment W (W 0, E 0): Equilibrium Wage and Employment Level S 0 W 0 D 0 E 0 D 0: Labor Demand S 0 : Labor Supply Even in a market-equilibrium or full-employment situation there will still be some frictional unemployment, because some people will be “between jobs”. Employment Frictional unemployment arises because labor markets are inherently dynamic, because information flows are imperfect, and because it takes time for unemployed workers and employers with job vacancies to find each other.

(2) Structural Unemployment Structural unemployment arises when changes in the pattern of labor demand cause a mismatch between the skills demanded and supplied in a given area or cause an imbalance between the supplies and demands for workers across areas. W W S 0 B S 0 A W 1 B W 0 A W 0 B D 1 A E 0 A D 0 A Employment D 1 B E 0 B E 1 B D 0 B Employment →Unemployment of E 0 A – E 1 A workers would be created in the short run.

l If wages were completely flexible and if costs of occupational or geographic mobility were low, market adjustments would quickly eliminate this type of unemployment. l Note: It has been argued that structural unemployment may also arise if some employers are paying above market-clearing (or efficiency) wages to reduce employee turnover and/or shirking and to increase productivity.

(3) Demand-Deficient Unemployment Demand-deficient unemployment occurs when a decline in aggregate demand in the output market causes the aggregate demand for labor to decline in the face of downward inflexibility in real wages. W S 0 W 2 D 0 D 1 E 2 E 0 E If real wages are inflexible downward, E fall to E 1, and E 0 – E 1 workers will become unemployed. →Flows into unemployment increase while flows into employed decline. One appropriate government response to demand-deficient unemployment is to pursue macroeconomic policies to increase aggregate demand; these policies include increasing the level of government spending, reducing taxes, and increasing the rate of growth of the money supply.

l a. b. c. d. Why employers respond to a cyclical decline in demand by temporarily laying off some of their work force rather than reducing real wages. Rigid money wage: employers are not free to unilaterally cut money wages because of the presence of unions. The asymmetry of the information between employers and employees makes layoffs the preferred policy. In the presence of investments in firm-specific human capital, layoffs affect only the least-experienced workers, the workers in whom the firm has invested the smallest amount of resources. →The firm will find choosing the layoff strategy a more profitable alternative. A system of layoffs in which the newest employees are laid off first provides an implicit contract (a guarantee or form of insurance to experienced workers) that they will be immune to all but the severest declines in demand. →They will be willing to pay for the stability by accepting lower wages.

(4) Seasonal Unemployment Seasonal unemployment is similar to demanddeficient unemployment in that it is induced by fluctuations in the demand for labor. However, the fluctuations can be regularly anticipated and follow a systematic pattern over the course of a year. e. g. , Agricultural employee To attract workers to such seasonal industries, firm will have to pay workers higher wages to compensate them for being periodically unemployed. →The existence of compensating wage differentials makes it difficult to evaluate whether this type of unemployment is voluntary or involuntary in nature.

3. Job Search l Many theories claim to explain the existence and persistence of unemployment in competitive markets. Any given worker can choose from among many different job offers. Because it takes time to learn about the opportunities provided by different employers, search activities prolong the duration of the unemployment spell. The worker, however, is willing to endure a longer unemployment spell because it might lead to a higher-paying job. In fact, search unemployment is a human capital investment in information.

(1) The Wage Offer Distribution l To simplify the analysis, we assume that search activities are conducted only by unemployed workers. The wage offer distribution gives the frequency distribution describing the various offers available to a particular unemployed worker in the labor market. l The unemployed worker knows the shape of the wage offer distribution. Search activities, however, are costly. Each time the worker applies for a new job, he incurs transportation and other types of search costs. Moreover, he is also forgoing earnings: He could have been working at a lower-paying job. The worker’s economic trade-offs are clear: The longer he searches, the more likely he will get a high wage offer; the longer he searches, however, the more it costs to find that job.

(2) The Asking Wage l The asking wage is the threshold wage that determines if the unemployed worker accepts or rejects incoming job offers. There is a clear link between a worker’s asking wage and the length of the unemployment spell the worker will experience. Workers who have low asking wages will find acceptable jobs very quickly and the unemployment spell will be short. Workers with high asking wages will take a long time to find an acceptable job and the unemployment spell will be very long.

The marginal revenue curve Dollars gives the gain from an additional search. It is MC downward sloping because the better the offer at hand, the less there is to gain from an additional search. The marginal cost curve gives the cost of an additional search. It is upward MR sloping because the better the job offer at hand, the greater the 0 $10 $25 $5 opportunity cost of an additional Wage Offer at Hand search. The asking wage equates the marginal revenue The Determination of the Asking Wage and the marginal cost of search.

(3) Determinants of the Asking Wage l l The worker’s asking wage will respond to changes in the benefits and costs of search activities. Workers with high discount rates are presentoriented, and hence perceive the future benefits from search to be low. A major component of search costs is the opportunity cost resulting from rejecting a job offer and continuing the search. The unemployment insurance (UI) system, compensates workers who are unemployed and who are actively engaging in search activities. Unemployment insurance benefits, therefore, reduce the marginal cost of search.

失業者找尋 作方法-按年齡分 單位 ： % 找 Item 年齡 尋 託親友師長介紹 年 93 95 97 作 方 向私立就業服務機 構登記求職 93 95 97 法 應徵廣告、招貼 93 95 97 １５～２４歲 53. 44 57. 36 52. 63 19. 13 20. 46 28. 54 84. 40 74. 73 62. 94 １５～１９歲 62. 05 75. 32 77. 62 18. 26 8. 84 19. 73 85. 32 80. 50 66. 98 ２０～２４歲 51. 66 54. 68 48. 36 19. 31 22. 20 30. 05 84. 21 73. 87 62. 25 ２５～４４歲 61. 27 60. 09 54. 05 22. 08 26. 28 32. 91 74. 53 69. 63 67. 67 ２５～２９歲 57. 39 59. 02 46. 90 23. 26 29. 80 35. 13 78. 46 71. 69 65. 45 ３０～３４歲 60. 02 62. 02 59. 86 27. 96 22. 92 33. 43 70. 67 70. 24 70. 00 ３５～３９歲 66. 47 60. 41 57. 52 21. 75 19. 14 29. 19 77. 73 67. 40 73. 20 ４０～４４歲 65. 09 59. 50 60. 88 13. 62 30. 21 30. 24 68. 65 65. 37 63. 96 ４５歲及以上 68. 52 57. 24 66. 18 14. 25 15. 12 27. 92 57. 75 50. 24 61. 51 ４５～４９歲 62. 33 51. 53 66. 02 16. 40 8. 92 34. 47 59. 92 45. 95 66. 33 ５０歲及以上 73. 23 61. 57 66. 33 12. 62 19. 82 21. 58 56. 09 53. 50 56. 85 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業者找尋 作方法-按教育程度分 單位 ： % 找 Item 教育程度 尋 託親友師長介紹 年 93 95 97 作 方 向私立就業服務機 構登記求職 93 95 97 法 應徵廣告、招貼 93 95 97 國中及以下 71. 60 69. 12 67. 33 14. 37 15. 56 21. 36 61. 31 59. 22 65. 54 國小及以下 75. 25 59. 31 60. 59 9. 17 8. 42 20. 64 40. 65 40. 73 59. 50 國中 69. 92 72. 73 70. 26 16. 76 18. 19 21. 67 70. 82 66. 02 68. 17 高中（職） 59. 90 64. 18 65. 01 19. 73 22. 63 31. 59 82. 64 76. 25 72. 52 高中 60. 70 68. 00 66. 11 21. 98 20. 81 36. 30 85. 46 68. 90 70. 79 高職 59. 66 63. 06 64. 64 19. 03 23. 17 29. 98 81. 76 78. 41 73. 12 大專及以上 52. 11 46. 67 41. 17 24. 64 27. 60 35. 70 72. 89 62. 80 58. 66 專科 55. 75 54. 15 50. 92 19. 30 27. 19 39. 82 79. 41 70. 84 67. 16 大學及以上 47. 61 40. 61 35. 82 31. 24 27. 93 33. 44 64. 83 56. 29 53. 99 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業者失業期間-按年齡分 單位 ： % 失 Item 年齡 業 １～２週 年 期 間 ３ ～４ 週 ５ ～ １３ 週 93 95 97 １５～２４歲 12. 36 11. 46 13. 18 11. 55 14. 39 12. 76 27. 31 29. 03 32. 25 １５～１９歲 21. 66 22. 17 29. 44 2. 26 6. 99 18. 04 18. 31 35. 88 28. 69 ２０～２４歲 10. 47 9. 88 10. 43 13. 45 15. 48 11. 87 29. 15 28. 02 32. 85 ２５～４４歲 7. 89 7. 27 8. 54 11. 37 13. 63 8. 79 22. 09 23. 41 24. 86 ２５～２９歲 6. 68 6. 12 8. 36 14. 19 15. 76 10. 43 22. 50 25. 32 26. 60 ３０～３４歲 7. 23 5. 85 8. 23 10. 78 12. 92 8. 36 26. 62 25. 39 23. 76 ３５～３９歲 9. 82 10. 98 5. 68 7. 56 14. 50 6. 77 20. 21 22. 49 25. 50 ４０～４４歲 9. 06 8. 46 12. 59 10. 39 7. 77 7. 25 18. 13 15. 82 21. 14 ４５歲及以上 7. 34 11. 44 11. 53 12. 92 9. 90 13. 05 19. 84 17. 10 25. 16 ４５～４９歲 8. 25 14. 56 10. 53 14. 73 8. 42 4. 68 14. 38 15. 36 28. 29 ５０歲及以上 6. 62 8. 95 12. 46 11. 48 11. 08 20. 70 24. 18 18. 49 22. 30 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業者失業期間-按年齡分(續) 單位 ： % 失 Item 年齡 年 業 14 ～ 26 週 期 間 (續) 27 ～ 52 週 53 週以上 93 95 97 平均 失 業時 間 93 95 97 １５～２４歲 21. 69 21. 34 14. 11 20. 64 13. 77 22. 78 6. 43 10. 00 4. 92 20. 99 １５～１９歲 20. 77 17. 00 8. 66 28. 64 17. 96 11. 47 8. 36 - 3. 69 23. 51 ２０～２４歲 21. 88 21. 98 15. 03 19. 01 13. 15 24. 70 6. 04 11. 48 5. 12 20. 47 ２５～４４歲 19. 42 24. 98 21. 16 18. 86 17. 50 18. 74 20. 36 13. 20 17. 91 30. 98 ２５～２９歲 17. 30 26. 72 23. 43 20. 54 17. 15 19. 46 18. 80 8. 94 11. 72 29. 68 ３０～３４歲 20. 08 23. 92 16. 80 17. 20 17. 73 18. 54 18. 09 14. 18 24. 29 29. 52 ３５～３９歲 17. 75 21. 26 18. 47 20. 11 15. 14 18. 87 24. 55 15. 63 24. 72 33. 86 ４０～４４歲 23. 97 26. 29 24. 53 16. 58 20. 95 16. 95 21. 87 20. 70 17. 54 32. 32 ４５歲及以上 17. 93 21. 65 20. 82 15. 09 19. 76 16. 09 26. 88 20. 15 13. 35 35. 63 ４５～４９歲 19. 14 26. 98 20. 58 15. 20 18. 77 20. 32 28. 29 15. 91 15. 61 36. 92 ５０歲及以上 16. 96 17. 38 21. 04 15. 00 20. 56 12. 22 25. 76 23. 54 11. 28 34. 61 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業者失業期間-按教育程度分 單位 ： % 失 Item 教育程度 業 １～２週 年 93 95 期 間 ３ ～４ 週 97 93 95 ５ ～ １３ 週 97 93 95 97 國中及以下 10. 38 8. 71 12. 95 11. 56 12. 09 8. 95 23. 10 20. 07 26. 38 國小及以下 10. 37 12. 36 10. 85 11. 74 12. 10 9. 95 22. 65 17. 91 29. 30 國中 10. 38 7. 37 13. 85 11. 48 12. 08 8. 52 23. 32 20. 86 25. 13 高中（職） 8. 86 9. 95 12. 33 9. 41 12. 54 10. 11 19. 82 25. 37 25. 21 高中 5. 56 6. 95 7. 90 8. 48 11. 33 10. 93 19. 77 32. 45 27. 09 高職 9. 89 10. 80 13. 85 9. 70 12. 89 9. 83 19. 83 23. 35 24. 57 大專及以上 7. 43 8. 36 6. 49 15. 09 14. 40 11. 88 26. 86 23. 85 28. 04 專科 7. 53 11. 42 3. 94 16. 99 16. 04 14. 78 26. 82 26. 44 31. 20 大學及以上 7. 30 5. 87 7. 90 12. 74 13. 07 10. 28 26. 92 21. 76 26. 31 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

失業者失業期間-按教育程度分(續) 單位 ： % 失 Item 教育程度 年 業 14 ～ 26 週 93 95 期 間 (續) 27 ～ 52 週 97 93 95 53 週以上 97 93 95 97 平均 失 業時 間 國中及以下 19. 03 26. 38 22. 01 16. 57 16. 71 14. 02 19. 35 16. 04 15. 70 29. 48 國小及以下 16. 34 18. 01 15. 59 15. 65 22. 27 15. 19 23. 25 17. 36 19. 13 33. 15 國中 20. 33 29. 46 24. 76 17. 00 14. 66 13. 52 17. 49 15. 56 14. 23 27. 73 高中（職） 22. 44 24. 66 19. 83 19. 74 15. 26 17. 70 19. 74 12. 22 14. 82 31. 53 高中 26. 28 14. 05 20. 09 16. 88 21. 44 19. 01 23. 02 13. 78 14. 98 33. 27 高職 21. 23 27. 69 19. 74 20. 63 13. 49 17. 25 18. 71 11. 78 14. 76 30. 99 大專及以上 16. 48 20. 23 17. 67 18. 68 19. 21 23. 55 15. 46 13. 95 12. 37 26. 84 專科 15. 97 17. 71 12. 10 16. 03 15. 92 22. 96 16. 67 12. 46 15. 02 27. 48 大學及以上 17. 12 22. 26 20. 74 21. 96 21. 88 23. 87 13. 97 15. 16 10. 91 26. 06 資料來源：主計處人力資源調查報告

4. Inflation and Unemployment l (1) Note: Because our focus is on the labor market, we shall emphasize the price of labor-the wage rate-when discussing the issue of inflation. The Inflation/Unemployment Trade-Off The negative relationship between unemployment and wage inflation was dubbed the Phillips curve. Rate of Wage Inflation Unemployment During the 1970 s the relationship appears to have broken down. →An interpretation is that while a trade-off between the rates of inflation and unemployment exists at a point in time, the position of the trade-off curve is determined by a number of other factors that can change over time.

Rate of Wage Inflation ( 1970 s 1960 s ) Early 1980 s Progressively higher rates of wage inflation have become associated with any given level of unemployment. W 2 W 1 W 0 Unemployment Rate (U) It is also possible that the Phillips curve has become much flatter over recent years, so that the decrease in wage inflation accompanying a 1% point increase in the unemployment rate is now smaller than it once was.

(2) The Basic Model of the Inflation/Unemployment Trade-Off Wage Supply W 2 W 1 W 0 W 3 W 4 Demand It is reasonable to assume that the speed at which The wage rate changes is related to the extend to which the labor market is in disequilibrium, as measured by the excess demand for labor. E i. e. , the percentage rate of change of wage ( the excess demand for labor (X) ) is proportional to

Excess Demand for Labor (X) W W=αX Relationship Between the Excess Demand for Labor and the Unemployment Rate X 1 W 1 Excess Supply X<0 X 1 X U 1 U* U Excess Demand X>0 Because the excess demand for labor is usually not observable, it is necessary to replace it with an observable variable, such as the unemployment rate. U* is the unemployment rate that exists when the excess demand for labor is zero. i. e. , natural or full-employment rate of unemployment.

W Trade-off Between Wage Inflation and the Unemployment Rate W 1 U* U