Understanding and Managing Organizational Behavior Chapter 3 Values

Chapter Objectives § Describe the nature of work values and ethical values and why they are of critical importance in organizations § Understand why it is important to understand employees’ moods and emotions on the job § Appreciate when and why emotional labor occurs in organizations 3 -2 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Chapter Objectives § Describe the nature, causes, theories, and consequences of job satisfaction § Appreciate the distinction between affective commitment and continuance commitment and their implications for understanding organizational behavior 3 -3 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Opening Case: Richard Branson is Never Bored § Is it possible to have fun while performing a very high stakes job? § Richard Branson, Founder and CEO of Virgin Group, Ltd. – “I don’t think of work as work and play as play. It’s all living…. I’m living and learning every day. ” 3 -4 © 2005 Prentice Hall

The Nature of Values § One’s personal convictions about what one should strive for in life and how one should behave – Work values: employee’s personal convictions about what outcomes one should expect from work and how one should behave at work – Ethical values: one’s personal convictions about what is right and wrong 3 -5 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Outcome Expectations and Work § § § 3 -6 Comfortable existence Family security Sense

Table 3. 1 A Comparison of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Work Values Intrinsic Values § Interesting work § Challenging work § Learning new things § Making important contributions § Responsibility and autonomy § Being creative 3 -7 Extrinsic Values § High pay § Job security § Job benefits § Status in wider community § Social contacts § Time with family § Time for hobbies © 2005 Prentice Hall

Ethical Values § One’s personal convictions about what is right and wrong – Utilitarian values: decisions should produce the greatest good for the greatest number of people – Moral rights values: decisions should protect the fundamental rights ad privileges of those affected – Justice values: decisions should allocate benefits and harms among those affected by the decision in a fair and equitable manner. 3 -8 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Code of Ethics § Set of formal rules and standards, based on ethical values and beliefs about what is right and wrong, that employees can use to make appropriate decisions when the interests of other individuals or groups are at stake – Whistleblowers inform people in positions of authority of instances of wrongdoing, illegal behavior, or unethical behavior in an organization 3 -9 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Work Attitudes § Collections of feelings, beliefs, and thoughts about how to behave that people currently hold about their jobs and organizations. § Specific work attitudes: – Job satisfaction is the collection of feelings and beliefs that people have about their current jobs. – Organizational commitment is the collection of feelings and beliefs that people have about their organizations as a whole. 3 -10 © 2005 Prentice Hall

6 Work Moods § How people feel at the time they actually perform their jobs. § More transitory than values and attitudes. § Determining factors: – Personality – Work situation – Circumstances outside of work 3 -11 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Work Moods Positive § Excited § Enthusiastic § Active § Strong § Peppy §

Emotions § Intense, short-lived feelings that are linked to specific cause or antecedent § Emotions can feed into moods § Emotional labor: the work employees perform to control their experience and expression of moods and emotions on the job 3 -13 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Determinants of Job Satisfaction_1 § Personality: the enduring ways a person has of feeling, thinking, and behaving – Extroverts tend to have higher levels of job satisfaction than introverts § Values: reflect employees’ convictions about the outcomes that work should lead to and how one should behave at work – Those with strong intrinsic work values is more likely than one with weak intrinsic work values to be satisfied with a job that is meaningful but requires long hours and offer poor pay 3 -14 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Determinants of Job Satisfaction_2 § Work Situation – tasks a person performs – people a jobholder interacts with – surroundings in which a person works – the way the organization treats the jobholder 3 -15 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Determinants of Job Satisfaction_3 § Social Influence: influence that individuals or groups have on a person’s attitudes and behavior – Coworkers – Family – Other reference groups (unions, religious groups, friends) – Culture 3 -16 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Theories of Job Satisfaction § § 3 -17 The Facet Model Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Theory

The Facet Model § Focuses primarily on work situation factors by breaking a job into its component elements, or job facets, and looking at how satisfied workers are with each. § A worker’s overall job satisfaction is determined by summing his or her satisfaction with each facet of the job. 3 -18 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Table 3. 2 Job Facets § § § § § 3 -19 Ability utilization Achievement Activity Advancement Authority Company policies and practices Compensation Co-workers Creativity Independence § § § § Moral values Recognition Responsibility Security Social service Social status Human relations supervision § Technical supervision § Variety § Working conditions © 2005 Prentice Hall

Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Theory of Job Satisfaction § Focuses on the effects of certain types of job facets § Everyone has two sets of needs or requirements – Motivator needs are associated with the actual work itself and how challenging it is • Facets: interesting work, autonomy, responsibility – Hygiene needs are associated with the physical and psychological context in which the work is performed • Facets: physical working conditions, pay, security 3 -20 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Herzberg’s Motivator-Hygiene Theory § Hypothesized relationships between motivator needs, hygiene needs, and job satisfaction: – When motivator needs are met, workers will be satisfied; when these needs are not met, workers will not be satisfied. – When hygiene needs are met, workers will not be dissatisfied; when these needs are not met, workers will be dissatisfied. 3 -21 © 2005 Prentice Hall

The Discrepancy Model of Job Satisfaction § To determine how satisfied they are with their jobs, workers compare their job to some “ideal job. ” This “ideal job” could be – What one thinks the job should be like – What one expected the job to be like – What one wants from a job – What one’s former job was like § Can be used in combination with the Facet Model. 3 -22 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Determining Satisfaction with the Discrepancy and Facet Models § A) How much (enter job facet) do you currently have at your job? § B) How much (enter job facet) do you think your job should have? § The difference between A and B indicates the level of satisfaction with that facet § The differences are summed for an overall satisfaction score 3 -23 © 2005 Prentice Hall

The Steady-State Theory of Job Satisfaction § Each worker has a typical or characteristic level of job satisfaction, called the steady state or equilibrium level. § Different situational factors or events at work may move a worker temporarily from this steady state, but the worker will eventually return to his or her equilibrium level. 3 -24 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Consequences of Job (Dis)Satisfaction § Performance: Performance Satisfied workers are slightly more likely to perform at a higher level than dissatisfied workers § Absenteeism: Absenteeism Satisfied workers are only slightly less likely to be absent than dissatisfied workers § Turnover: Turnover Satisfied workers are less likely to leave the organization than dissatisfied workers 3 -25 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Table 3. 3 Determinants of Absence from Work § Motivation to attend work is affected by – Job satisfaction – Organization’s absence policy – Other factors 3 -26 § Ability to attend work is affected by – Illness and accidents – Transportation problems – Family responsibilities © 2005 Prentice Hall

Consequences of Job Satisfaction § Organizational citizenship behavior (OCB): Satisfied workers are more likely to engage in this behavior than dissatisfied workers. – Helping coworkers, spreading goodwill § Employee well-being: well-being Satisfied workers are more likely to have strong well-being than dissatisfied workers. – How happy, healthy, and prosperous workers are 3 -27 © 2005 Prentice Hall

Organizational Commitment § Feelings and beliefs about the employing organization as a whole – Affective commitment – Continuance commitment § Affective commitment is more positive for organizations than continuance commitment 3 -28 © 2005 Prentice Hall