UNCLASSIFIED Joint Seabasing and the JCIDS Process Colonel

UNCLASSIFIED Joint Seabasing and the JCIDS Process Colonel Greg Cook, USAF Chief, Studies, Analysis and Gaming Division Joint Staff J-8 NDIA Expeditionary Warfare Conference 20 Oct 2004 UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Overview • What is JCIDS? “Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System” • Review of New Do. D Requirements, Acquisition and Test Process • FCBs, JICs, and CBAs • Seabasing CBA Overview • JFCOM Seabasing Concepts UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) • JCIDS implements a capabilities-based process – Rigorous, up-front analysis by functionally-focused teams – More programs (below ACAT I) will get joint visibility • Nine month (+) development process • Processes are aligned – Capability Needs across OSD, Intelligence Community, National Security Space Architect – Acquisition process with AT&L, NII, and Do. D Space Acquisition Milestone Decision Authority – Resource Allocation process UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED JCIDS Process Overview Joint Operating Concepts Joint Functional Concepts Joint Integrating Concepts Sec. Def Resource Strategy - Integrated Priority Lists - Joint Quarterly Readiness Review - Lessons Learned - Service Programs - Strategic Planning Guidance - Joint Experimentation - ACTDs rv ic e. C on ce pt USMC USAF USN USA s Joint Integrating Concept Se Joint Operations Concepts Potential Capability Improvement Areas Command & Control Joint Functional Concepts Battlespace Awareness Force Management Protection Focused Logistics Capability Disconnect JSB HLS Joint Chiefs of Staff Capability Roadmap MCO Joint Integrating Concept STAB OPS STRAT DEFT Joint Operating Concepts Joint Requirements Oversight Council Capability Assessment Map Systems to Functions function g task g function task f f function task g g function task e e task dd dd function task function b task function task cc cc function a task b function task b b task a function a task a Capability capability Capability capability system 1 system 21 system 2 system 32 3 system 4 4 system 3 system 5 system 4 4 system 6 system 5 75 system 7 system 6 6 system Secretary of Defense Joint Staff and OSD SV-5 Joint Requirements Oversight Council UNCLASSIFIED

DOD End-to-End Requirements, Acquisition, and Test Process UNCLASSIFIED DAB Capability Area Reviews (CARs) • Strategic Planning Guidance • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transformation activity Select a Joint Integrating Concept Develop Concept Capabilities Based Assessment • • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Functional Area Analysis • Non-materiel Gaps solutions Shortfalls • Redundancies Materiel solutions Risk areas • S+T initiatives • Experimentation *Functional Needs Analysis *Functional Solutions Analysis Capability Based Assessment USM C OSD/JCS COCOM A r m y Navy FCB COCOMs OSD (AT&L) OSD (NII) ICD Analysis of Alternatives OSD (AT&L)- led Capability Roadmaps Air Force Technology Development CD CD CDD D D • Revise KPPs • LRIP • IOT&E • Detailed design • System • LRIP integration • FOT&E • DT&E MS “C” System Development CP CP CPD D D Production nn Evolutionary or Spiral Development Services DIA OSD (PA&E) oversight Sec. De Joint Chiefs of Staff & Joint Requirements Oversight Council f Policy • Refined • Affordable concept military-useful • Analysis of increment Alternatives • Technology demonstrated Development • Initial KPPs Strategy • SEP • So. S System Engineering Concept MS “A” MS “B” Decision Technology Capabilities Definition Joint OSD Joint. Staff/(OSD) OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Concept Refinement Acquisition and Test *“as is” Roadmaps UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Functional Capabilities Board • Responsible for the organization, analysis, and prioritization of joint warfighting capabilities • Lead coordinating body to ensure that the joint force is best served throughout the JCIDS and acquisition process Advisory Body to the JCB and JROC on Joint and JCIDS Initiatives UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Functional Capabilities Board Portfolios Force Application Battlespace Awareness • Land, maritime, air and space ops • Joint targeting • Conventional attack • Nuclear attack • CNA • Electronic attack • PSYOPS • Special ops • Joint fires • SEAD • Military deception • • All source Intel collection Environmental data collection Predictive analysis Knowledge management Protection • Personnel and infrastructure protection • CND • Counter- proliferation • Non-proliferation • Consequence management Force Management • • • Net-Centric • Comms and computer environment • Own force info collection Command Control • COP • JFC 2 Focused Logistics • Readiness Joint Manning Global Posture AC/RC Force Generation Command Relationships Global Visibility of force structure issues Force Management Data Construct Building Global Force Management (GFM) Capability Seabasing • Deployment distribution • Sustainment • Medical • Mobility • Logistics C 2 UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Joint Integrating Concept Definition: • A description of how a Joint Force Commander integrates functional means to achieve operational ends. • Includes a list of essential battlespace effects (including supporting tasks, measures of effectiveness, and measures of performance) and a CONOPS for integrating these effects together to achieve the desired endstate Purpose: • Initiates Capability Based Assessments • Describes the Joint Force Commander’s future operating environment, how the force will be used to accomplish objectives • Integrates Joint functional capabilities in the context of a JOC (e. g. , MCO-JUSS) UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Relationship Between Current JICs Win the Major Combat Operation (MCO JOC) Operate from Seabasing (Seabasing JIC) Conduct Global Strikes (Global Strike JIC) Set Conditions for Follow-On/ Decisive Ops Apply Coercive Pressure Gain & Maintain Access to the Theater Close & Assemble the Joint Force Plan & Task Joint Force Ops (Joint C 2 JIC) Gain Air Superiority Suppress the Integrated Air Defense System Sustain the Joint Force (Joint Log JIC) Reconstitute the Joint Force Gain Maritime Superiority Defeat A/C, CMs & BMs (IAMD JIC) Destroy A/C CMs & BMs prior to launch and supporting infrastructure Employ Joint Combat Power (Global Strike & JFEO JICs) Passively Defend Key Targets & Infrastructure Defeat Surface. Threats Shoot down A/C, CMs, & BMs in Flight Sink Subs at Sea Defeat Undersea Threats (JUSS JIC) Sink Subs & Minelayers in Port Clear Mines Effects Chain/Kill Chain/Mission Thread Detect – Track – Identify – Decide/Task – Engage/Attack - Assess UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED JIC to CBA Process Highlights h 1 Mont h 2 Mont h 3 Mont h 4 Mont h 5 Joint Integrating Concept Development Resourcing & TOR Development Concept Development • Tasks • Capabilities • Attributes • Metrics • Concurrent Development of DPS-based vignette Mont h 6 Mont h 7 h 8 Mont h 9 h 10 Mont h 11 Mont Capabilities-Based Assessment – – FAA Capabilities Tasks Attributes Metrics – – FSA FNA – Determine initial Non- Gaps Shortfalls Redundancies Risk Areas – – COCOM or Service Mont Army USMC COCOMs OSD (AT&L) Experimentation Inputs/Recs Solutions –Material –Non-Material Navy FCBs OSD (NII) materiel & Materiel Alternatives Recommend a prioritized capability approach to meet the need, including initial TRL, sustainability, supportability, schedule of delevery, and affordability assessments Assess operational risk of each approach Consider S&T Initiatives ID Experimentation needs Campaignlevel Analysis Air Force DIA OSD (PA&E) UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Seabasing CBA Task • Conduct a Capability Based Assessment of Seabasing in 2015 Homeland Security Stability Operations Major Combat Operations Strategic Deterrence Seize the Initiative This context … Operational Access Undersea Superiority JUSS Forcible Entry Operational Access Sea Basing Global Strike IAMD JFEO UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Seabasing CBA Plan of Attack Sep HOLIDAY CBA Team Initial Mtg O-6 GOFO Wargame Outbrief O-6 Workshops Oct Nov Dec HOLIDAY FM FCB TOR Plan of Attack JROC Wargame Outbrief FM FCB Capabilities FAA, M&S, Data Call & Lit Review Table Top M&S Scenarios #1 #2 #3 Jan Mar Feb Apr Data Call Literature Review FM FCB FSA & Recommendations FNA, DOTMLPF FM FCB JROC JCB IPR May Jun Draft Final Rpt VFT Modeling/Analysis Jul Modeling & Simulation Scenario Development JIC / TOR Development / Staffing FM FCB SV-5 X Seabasing Capabilities Based Assessment Wargame the JIC Functional Area Analysis Functional Needs Analysis Functional Solutions Analysis (FAA) ( FNA) ( FSA) FAA – – Capabilities Tasks Attributes Metrics FNA – – Gaps Shortfalls Redundancies Risk Areas FSA – Non-Materiel & Materiel Alternatives – S&T Initiatives – Experimentation Capabilities Based Assessment: – – What Joint Seabasing capability does the JFC need in 2015? What is the objective for that capability? Where are the gaps? What material & non-material solutions meet that capability? Which solutions provide the greatest benefit to the JFC? UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED J 8 Seabasing CBA Wargame Purpose: • Scope the seabasing concept for the CBA • Provide joint input to further refine the JIC • Expose / educate a large joint body to seabasing concepts Objectives: • Obtain Joint Force Commander inputs on seabasing • Identify and test potential seabasing CONOPs • Determine which 2015 capabilities (forces/assets) might be involved in a Co. Com CONOPs that uses seabasing concepts • Understand feasibility of executing a CONOPs with seabasing • Determine how an enemy might react to seabasing and obtain initial threat-based risk assessment UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Baseline Assumptions • Timeframe: 2015 • Focus: Operational Level of War • Force Structure: Joint forces based on Multi. Service Force Data (MSFD) • CONOPS: based on Defense Planning Scenario(s) • Context: Seize the Initiative Phase of MCO UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED JFCOM Joint Seabasing “Experimentation Hypothesis” IF a coherently joint expeditionary force is rapidly deployed, employed, sustained, and reconstituted/redeployed from a joint sea base, AND operations/logistics are interrelated and networked through an adaptive command control infrastructure, AND with the necessary connectors and interdependent nodes/platforms/capabilities, THEN sufficient combat power can be applied earlier to deter conflict and rapidly set the conditions for defeating an adaptive, asymmetric adversary in a distributed, antiaccess/area denial environment, thereby leading to earlier conflict resolution UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED How “Joint” is Joint Seabasing? !! “Deconflicted” “Interoperable” “Interdependent” JOINT SEA BASING UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Joint Seabasing CONOPS (JFCOM perspective) “Sea Based Rapid Response Force” Task organized; BDE (++) USCG Deepwater Joint C 2/ Joint Force Protection (Sea Shield, “Land Shield”, “Air Shield”) Navy CSG USMC ESG Combat Log Force - CLF “JMPF(F)” (Army AABDE/ARF) JOINT “JMPF(F)” Sea Base (USMC MEB) Tailored Joint Capabilities Packages Joint Force Projection, Sustainment, & Reconstitution “JMPF(F)” (USAF AEF) Strategic & Operational Air & Sealift Connectors Multi-national “JSV”, etc “JMPF(F)” – Joint Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future) (common platforms/tailored load-out) Global Distribution System “JSV” – Joint Support Vessel UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Creating Desired Effects NOT sequential! FORCIBLE ENTRY EARLY ENTRY SHAPING ss s s fe fe fe s s Desired effects fe TRANSITION Through adaptive Joint C 2, the JFC senses changes in capabilities required to create desired effects, and “morphs” the scalable JSB to respond (“Sense & Respond”) fe fe s ee ee ee s ee ee Continuous Global Reachback ee t t s t t UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED How well do Systems Perform? To answer this question, we need parameters and metrics that describe key physical characteristics of systems Function 1 System 1 COCOM MCC Function 2 System 1 System 2 System 4 Function 3 System 1 Function 4 Function 5 System 1 System 2 System 3 System 4 System 5 ACC CJTF System 8 System 6 System 7 System 8 System 9 GCC System 7 SOCC Other Supporting Co. Coms & Agencies Supported Component System 12 System 9 System 7 Supporting Components System 12 System 13 System 14 System 15 System 16 UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED We’ve got Gaps!!. . . So What? • Helps to answer the “so what? ” question Function 4 Robust Capability Function 5 • Puts identified gaps into perspective • Starting point for discussions of relative risk Effective Function 1 Function 2 Insufficient Function 3 Catastrophic Extensive Major Substantial Severity of Impact Modest Minor Risk Associated with Each Function Must Be Considered to Frame Subsequent Solutions Analysis and Resource Allocation Decisions UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED JCIDS Lessons Learned • Developing and organizing tasks/capabilities prior to any writing provides disciplined approach • Use available resources (OPLANs, UJTL, studies, etc) • Use DPS scenarios; they provide the most challenging threat and add the most rigor to concept • Get all stakeholders involved; avoid surprises – Transparency: Web sites, e-mail, conferences, workshops, etc • Feedback: Get GO/FO visibility early and often • Maintain objectivity, joint perspective UNCLASSIFIED

DOD End-to-End Requirements, Acquisition, and Test Process UNCLASSIFIED DAB Capability Area Reviews (CARs) • Strategic Planning Guidance • Defense Planning Scenarios • Family of Concepts • Transformation activity Select a Joint Integrating Concept Develop Concept Capabilities Based Assessment • • Capabilities • Tasks • Attributes • Metrics • Functional Area Analysis • Non-materiel Gaps solutions Shortfalls • Redundancies Materiel solutions Risk areas • S+T initiatives • Experimentation *Functional Needs Analysis *Functional Solutions Analysis Capability Based Assessment USM C OSD/JCS COCOM A r m y Navy FCB COCOMs OSD (AT&L) OSD (NII) ICD Analysis of Alternatives OSD (AT&L)- led Capability Roadmaps Air Force Technology Development CD CD CDD D D • Revise KPPs • LRIP • IOT&E • Detailed design • System • LRIP integration • FOT&E • DT&E MS “C” System Development CP CP CPD D D Production nn Evolutionary or Spiral Development Services DIA OSD (PA&E) oversight Sec. De Joint Chiefs of Staff & Joint Requirements Oversight Council f Policy • Refined • Affordable concept military-useful • Analysis of increment Alternatives • Technology demonstrated Development • Initial KPPs Strategy • SEP • So. S System Engineering Concept MS “A” MS “B” Decision Technology Capabilities Definition Joint OSD Joint. Staff/(OSD) OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E) -- Joint Staff (JROC) Concept Refinement Acquisition and Test *“as is” Roadmaps UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED Questions? UNCLASSIFIED