Trigger simulation for 2004 2005 Trigger data quality





















- Slides: 21

Trigger simulation for 2004 -2005 • Trigger data quality • Calorimeter trigger threshold calibration • DC trigger threshold calibration LNF, 1 Feb 2006 M. Palutan and B. Sciascia for the Trigger group

Trigger data quality critical issues: • hardware errors from TORTA board CALO trigger information in the decision board is not compatible with what observed at the sector’s level • bad RF signal from DAFNE some clocks are lost by the RF/4 -T 1 sinch. chain wrong event-t 0, bad calo time resolution. • missing veto at injection (not critical, possibly higher bkg) results: • list of “bad” runs

Summary: All runs 2004 2005 N-A NOT-reco (nb-1) ------------------------------------------------Torta-bad OR (t 0 -bad>0. 01%) 101 NO-inj-veto 0 NO physmon info 48 • Updated run list ready 18250 9157 Rejected 755 11980 DB 2 flag (No-INJ) 3024 12580

Data quality vs run number 2004 Not-Reco 2005 2004 Reco 2005 Bad trigger conditions 2005 No PHYSMON info

Calorimeter trigger threshold calibration Control samples: • Kcrash+auto. TRG + KS p 0 p 0 (“photons”) + KS p+p (“pions”) • Single sector threshold evaluation for data and MC • 2004 -2005 data set divided in 20 periods of about 100 pb-1 according to main HW interventions and machine stops. Results: • Comparison of Data and MC photon thresholds MC thr settings (already in DB 2).

Th(Me. V) Photons on the barrel (before calibration) 5% data Z(cm) data/MC Th(Me. V) MC 5% Z(cm)

Th(Me. V) Photons on the barrel (after calibration) Z(cm) Th(Me. V) Data MC Z(cm) data/MC

Photons on the End. Caps (after calibration) Th(Me. V) Y(cm) Th(Me. V) data MC data/MC Y(cm)

Photon trigger sector multiplicity East data MC Barrel d < 1% West

Pion trigger sector multiplicity East data MC Barrel d 2 3% West

MC efficiency spread for a +/- 5% overall threshold drift p 0 p 0 p 0 KS p 0 p 0 d 0. 5% p +p -p 0 Ke 3 Km 3 KL decay

MC efficiency spread for a +/- 5% overall threshold drift KS p+p- d 1% p 0 p 0 p 0 p +p -p 0 Ke 3 Km 3 KL decay

Cosmic veto barrel multiplicity Photons Barrel Pions data MC Barrel

DC trigger threshold calibration Control sample: • Kcrash+auto. TRG + KS p+p • DC trigger efficiency on events triggered by CALO, evaluated on Data and MC. • 2004 -2005 data set divided in 20 periods of about 100 pb-1 according to main HW interventions and machine stops. Results: • Comparison of Data and MC DC trigger efficiency MC DC 2 thr settings (already in DB 2).

Data MC DC 2 efficiency vs data taking periods DC 2 Efficiency 2004 DC 2 efficiency scan vs threshold applied in MC DC 2 Efficiency 2005 Data period 1 DC 2 thr 0. 5 % DC 2 thr 70 75 80 85

Spares

TORTA hardware errors

Bad RF/4

Injection veto

Summary (RUN_NR 36 904, 30/05/05) N-A NOT-reco # of run (nb-1) ------------------------------------------------NO phystrig info 102 4416 14750 194 Torta-bad OR (t 0 -bad>0. 1%) 101 17270 2193 121 …+ (t 0 -bad>0. 01%) 0. 843 6308 36 … + NO-inj-veto 0. 633 11050 83 • Run list ready

Data quality vs run number Bad trigger conditions No PHYSMON info
Data cleaning problems and current approaches
Data quality and data cleaning an overview
Content analysis of secondary data
Data quality and data cleaning an overview
Change data capture sql server 2005
Perform quality assurance
Pmp quality management
Pmp gold plating
Ana quality assurance model
Compliance vs quality
Concept of quality assurance
Quality gurus meaning
Quality is free
Old quality vs new quality
Formuö
Novell typiska drag
Tack för att ni lyssnade bild
Returpilarna
Varför kallas perioden 1918-1939 för mellankrigstiden
En lathund för arbete med kontinuitetshantering
Särskild löneskatt för pensionskostnader
Personlig tidbok fylla i