VELO validation Criteria Status Aperture To be revisited (Massimo et al). Change in reference scenario, levelling, beam parameters etc. Mechanical and positioning tolerances OK Impedance • OK for increase in longitudinal impedance – should crosscheck with HL-LHC parameters (Elena Chapochnikova) • Benoit Salvant to re-check model, possible corrugation depth optimization – seeing Massi on 29 th April Vacuum stability OK – see VELO workshop Background LHCb to perform Monte Carlos – not expecting any issues (G. Corti) – see VELO workshop Machine protection/collimation Revisit for confirmation (Stefano et al)
Miscellaneous • Additional IPQ cables in IRs 1 & 5 – ECR for Q 4 installation in IR 1 to be released soon – Space reservation for Q 7/Q 8 on hold • CMS TAN cranes – “create the documentation, to launch the procedure, tests will be done during technical stop 1” – TS 1 now delayed until 15 th June
ALICE ZDC/protection devices post LS 2 • JJ gives required crossing angle given by long range beam-beam separation • ALICE want to avoid ZDC being shadowed by any (injection) protection devices • Need to ensure that existing and planned upgrades respect the constraints as much as possible
John Jowett’s conclusions • If – half-gap of 29. 5 mm is feasible for TCLIA and – it can be moved to 72. 748 m from IP (end of jaw) • then we can have ± 100 μrad half-crossing angle at IP 2 giving ~6σ separation with 50 ns bunch spacing (and nominal emittance) • New TDI proposal comfortable • TCDD seems OK if ± 35 mm vertical clearance is available in flange, open position