Training Asisten Effective Teaching Method Pembekalan Asisten dan
Training Asisten – Effective Teaching Method Pembekalan Asisten dan Asisten Lab Baru Departemen Akuntansi 2012 Dwi Martani Ketua Departemen Akuntansi FEUI
Agenda 1 Karir Akuntansi 2 Kurikulum dan Kompetensi 3 Bagaimana Efektif Mengajarkan
Karir Asisten § Asisten Lab Asisten Dosen § Syarat Dosen § S 2 bidang Akuntansi – luar negeri § Diangkat untuk menjadi dosen tetap S 3 § Dosen UI § Karir untuk menjadi dosen tetap kurang jelas § Dosen full time basis di UI namun tetap dapat menjalankan kegiatan lain tetapi tidak full time
Dosen § Aktivitas dosen melaksanakan tridarma perguruan tinggi § Pendidikan mengajar, menguji, membimbing, menulis buku ajar, mendampingi kegiatan mahasiswa § Penelitian publikasi jurnal, conference, tulisan ilmiah lain § Pengabdian masyarakat training, konsultasi, kajian regulasi negara § Kegiatan lain panitia, peserta seminar
Kepangkatan Dosen § Jenjang jabatan akademik § § Asisten ahli Lektor Kepala Profesor 850 § Jenjang kepangkatan § IIIB, IIIC, IIID § IVA, IVB, IVC, IVD
Strategi SDM Departemen § Persyaratan dosen S 2 Luar Negeri § Kondisi tertentu § S 2 DN, S 3 LN § S 2 DN dan S 3 DN dengan reputasi sangat baik § Kualifikasi § Berkinerja baik dalam menjalankan Tri Darma PT § Memiliki pengalaman praktik melalui PPA, training, pengabdian masyarakat § Memberikan kontribusi pada organisasi profesi, negara § Dosen tidak tetap dipertahankan dengan jumlah minimal, memiliki reputasi praktik / riset
Proses Menjadi Dosen § § § Asisten lab Asisten Dosen Asisten dosen sekolah LN Dosen Lulus bekerja sekola LN Dosen Sekolah LN proses kompetisi beasiswa Proses menunggu sekolah bekerja di dalam kampus, atau bekerja di luar kampus § Setelah sekolah full time di kampus
Asistensi § Mengembangkan kemampuan analisis dan aplikasi suatu pengetahuan relevan dengan praktik. § Membantu mengembangkan proffesional skill a) b) c) d) e) Intellectual skills Technical and functional skills numeracy decision modeling and risk analysis, measurement, reporting, compliance with legislation Personal skills self management, professional skepticism, decision making, initiative. Interpersonal and communication skills Organizational and business management skills
Asistensi § Tidak mengulang teori yang diajarkan cukup buatkan mind map / chart rangkuman materi yang harus dikuasai § Berikan tips aspek teknis yang perlu pendalaman silabus, bedakan yang penting dan kurang penting atau sekedar perlu. § Fokus pada proses bukan hasil akhir § Berikan kebebasan dalam melakukan proses dipengaruhi oleh kemampuan mahasiswa § Jalin komunikasi dengan dosen dan juga asisten § Koordinasi dengan asisten yang lain termasuk dengan koordinator lab asisten
Tips § Buat suasana kelas menarik § Siapkan penguasaan materi – mahasiswa pengin mengetahui sesuatu yang lain § Pilih strategi di setiap pertemuan sehingga asistensi menjadi menarik § Biarkan mahasiswa belajar dan mengerjakan sendiri § Berperan sebagai fasilitator / teman § Berikan penghargaan kepada mahasiswa sopan, keinginan untuk membantu
PENDIDIKAN SEBAGAI SISTEM KURIKULUM : SOFTWARE INPUT HARDWARE INPUT MAHASISWA PROSES BM EXTERNAL INPUT OUTPUT LULUSAN
Kurikulum § Kurikulum merupakan rambu-rambu untuk menjamin mutu dan kemampuan sesuai dengan program yang ditempuh. § Seperangkat rencana pengaturan berdasarkan standar pendidikan tentang kemampuan dan sikap serta pengalaman belajar dan penilaian yang berbasis pada potensi dan kondisi peserta didik. (SK Mendiknas 045 U/2002) § Seperangkat rencana dan pengaturan mengenai tujuan, isi bahan pelajaran serta cara yang digunakan sebagai pedoman penyelenggaraan kegiatan pembelajaran untuk mencapai tujuan pendidikan tertentu UU 20/2003 Sisdiknas
Kurikulum § Alat untuk mencapai tujuan pendidikan § Kurikulum dirancang fleksibel agar tujuan pendidikan dapat dicapai dan mengantisipasi perubahan lingkungan. § Bersumber pada visi, misi, tujuan dan strategi program studi. § Bukan hanya komposisi dan susunan mata ajar tetapi meliputi tujuan, kompetensi yang akan dicapai, materi, metodologi dan evaluasi. § Kurikulum dijabarkan dalam: § § § Profil lulusan Kompetensi apa akan dicapai Susunan mata ajar dan peta mata ajar Buku rancangan pengajaran silabus (untuk mahasiswa) Satuan Acara pengajaran
Pendekatan dalam Kurikulum Structure of subject matter Contentbased approach Content transmission
Pendekatan dalam Kurikulum Lulusan harus menguasai subjek keilmuan, dengan asumsi akan menunjukkan kinerja yang lebih komprehensif setelah menguasai subjek ilmu Berorientasi pada penguasaan bidang ilmu Contentbased approach Seringkali terjadi kesenjangan antara teori dan aplikasi praktek Kurikulum disusun berdasarkan asumsi dasar disiplin ilmu
Pendekatan Kompetensi dalam Kurikulum Integration Active learning Competency -based approach Students/ professional needs Contextual
Pendekatan dalam Kurikulum • Disusun berdasarkan tuntutan kompetensi lulusan yg dibutuhkan profesi dalam setting tertentu Competency -based approach • Asumsi : kemampuan kinerja tertentu dapat dicapai jika kualitas intelektual dibangun dengan dukungan materi tertentu • Pendidikan : “eksperimen”, atau pengalaman belajar dalam setting (situasi dan kondisi) tertentu untuk
KEMAMPUAN MINIMAL PENGUASAAN PENGETAHUAN, KETRAMPILAN DAN SIKAP SESUAI SASARAN KURIKULUM PROGRAM STUDINYA PENILAIAN OLEH PERGURUAN TINGGI SENDIRI KOMPETENSI SESEORANG UNTUK DAPAT MELAKUKAN TINDAKAN CERDAS, PENUH TANGGUNG JAWAB SEBAGAI SYARAT UNTUK DIANGGAP MAMPU OLEH MASYARAKAT DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGAS-TUGAS DI BIDANG PEKERJAAN TERTENTU PENILAIAN DILAKUKAN OLEH MASYARAKAT PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN
Ciri-ciri Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi § Menyatakan kompetensi secara jelas dari proses pembelajaran § Proses pembelajaran memberi bekal kepada tercapainya kompetensi dan berfokus pada mahasiswa (Student Centered Learning) § Mengutamakan kesatuan penguasaan ranah kognitif, psikomotorik dan afektif. § Proses penilaian lebih ditekankan pada kemampuan untuk mendemonstrasikan kognitif, psikomotorik dan afektif.
Analisis Kebutuhan Lulusan Perguruan tinggi diharapkan mempunyai kompetensi ( 5 elemen kompetensi ) yang sesuai kebutuhan stakeholders , berupa : • Kebutuhan masyarakat (societal needs) • Kebutuhan dunia kerja (industrial needs) • Kebutuhan profesional (professional needs) • Kebutuhan generasi masa depan (aspek vision) • Kebutuhan ilmu pengetahuan (aspek scientific)
KEPMENDIKNAS No. 232/U/2000 Pasal 1 dan 8: Ø Kelompok MPK (Pengembangan Kepribadian) Kelompok bahan kajian dan pelajaran untuk mengembangkan manusia Indonesia yang beriman dan bertaqwa terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dan berbudi pekerti luhur, berkepribadian mantap, dan mandiri serta mempunyai rasa tanggung jawab kemasyarakatan dan kebangsaan. Ø Kelompok MKK (Keilmuan dan Keterampilan) Kelompok bahan kajian dan pelajaran yang ditujukan terutama untuk memberikan landasan penguasaan ilmu dan keterampilan tertentu. Ø Kelompok MKB (Keahlian Berkarya) Kelompok bahan kajian dan pelajaran yang bertujuan menghasil-kan tenaga ahli dengan kekaryaan berdasarkan dasar ilmu dan keterampilan yang dikuasai.
KEPMENDIKNAS No. 232/U/2000 Pasal 1 dan 8: Ø Kelompok MPB (Perilaku Berkarya) Kelompok bahan kajian dan pelajaran yang bertujuan membentuk sikap dan perilaku yang diperlukan seseorang dalam berkarya menurut tingkat keahlian berdasarkan dasar ilmu dan keterampilan yang dikuasai. Ø Kelompok MBB (Berkehidupan Bermasyarakat) Kelompok bahan kajian dan pelajaran yang diperlukan seseorang untuk dapat memahami kaidah berkehidupan bermasyarakat sesuai dengan pilihan keahlian dalam berkarya.
SK. MENDIKNAS RI NO. 045/U/2002 TENTANG KURIKULUM INTI PENDIDIKAN TINGGI ELEMEN KOMPETENSI KURIKULUM INTI KURIKULUM INSTITUSIONAL Kompetensi Utama Kompetensi Pendukung Lainnya 40% - 80 % 20% - 40% 1. Landasan kepribadian. 2. Penguasaan ilmu dan ketrampilan. 3. Kemampuan berkarya. 4. Sikap dan perilaku dalam berkarya. 0% - 30% 5. Pemahaman kaidah berkehidupan bermasyarakat. KOMPETENSI UTAMA ditetapkan oleh kalangan Perguruan Tinggi, masyarakat profesi dan pengguna lulusan. KOMPETENSI PENDUKUNG & KOMPETENSI LAINNYA ditetapkan oleh Institusi penyelenggara program studi Tim KBK DIKTI 23
International Education Standard 24
International Education Standard § IES 1: ENTRY REQUIREMENTS TO A PROGRAM OF PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING EDUCATION § IES 2: CONTENT OF PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTING EDUCATION PROGRAMS § IES 3: PROFESSIONAL SKILLS § IES 4: PROFESSIONAL VALUES ETHICS AND ATTITUDES § IES 5: PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENTS § IES 6: ASSESSMENT OF PROFESSIONAL CAPABILITIES AND COMPETENCE § IES 7: CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT: A PROGRAM OF LIFELONG LEARNING AND CONTINUING DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE 25
International Education Standard Tujuan: Meyakinkan bahwa calon akuntan profesional memiliki pengetahuan profesional akuntansi yang memadai utk menjalankan fungsinya dalam menghadapi lingkungan yang kompleks dan berubah 26
IES 2 Tiga bidang utama: § Accounting, finance, and related knowledge § Organizational and business knowledge § Information technology knowledge and competence 27
Accounting, finance, and related knowledge a. b. c. d. e. f. g. financial accounting and reporting; management accounting and control; taxation; business and commercial law; audit and assurance; finance and financial management; and professional values and ethics. 28
Organizational and business knowledge a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. economics; business environment; corporate governance; business ethics; financial markets; quantitative methods; organizational behavior; management and strategic decision making; marketing; and international business and globalization. 29
Information technology knowledge and competence a. general knowledge of IT; b. IT control knowledge; c. IT control competences; d. IT user competences; and e. one of, or a mixture of, the competences of, the roles of manager, evaluator or designer of information systems. 30
Skill – IES 3 § The skills professional accountants require are grouped under five main headings: a) Intellectual skills b) Technical and functional skills numeracy decision modeling and risk analysis, measurement, reporting, compliance with legislation c) Personal skills self management, professional skepticism, decision making, initiative. d) Interpersonal and communication skills e) Organizational and business management skills
Value & Ethic – IES 4 § the public interest and sensitivity to social responsibilities; § continual improvement and lifelong learning; § reliability, responsibility, timeliness, courtesy and respect; and § laws and regulations.
KEAHLIAN SEORANG AKUNTAN § Analytical/critical thinking 4, 53 n Risk Analysis 3, 42 § Written communication 4, 39 n Measurement 3, 32 § Oral communication 4, 22 n Project management 3, 26 § Computing technology 4, 10 n Customer orientation 3, 23 § Decision making 4, 03 n Change management 3, 13 § Interpersonal skills 3, 94 n Negotiation 3, 13 § Continuous learning 3, 82 n Research 3, 08 § Teamwork 3, 81 n Entrepreneurship 2, 99 § Business decision modeling 3, 65 n Resources Management 2, 98 § Professional demeanor 3, 64 n Salesmanship 2, 61 § Leadership 3, 58 n Foreign language 2, 60 33
Taksonomi Bloom 34
Taksonomi Bloom 35
Taksonomi Bloom 36
Effective Teaching 37
MODEL PEMBELAJARAN Reading 20% Hearing words 30% Looking at picture PASSIVE 10% Watching video 50% Verbal reciving Visual reciving Looking at an exhibition Watching a demonstration Seeing it done on location Participating in a discussion Giving a talk Doing a Dramatic Presentation Simullating the Real Experience 90% TINGKAT MEMORISASI Doing the Real Thing ACTIVE 70% Participating Doing TINGKAT KETERLIBATAN
“The aim of teaching is simple: it is to make student learning possible” Paul Ramsden, Learning to Teach in Higher Education, London, Routledge, 1992: 5 39
Social Context Of Learning Is A Form Of Social Interaction Learning Takes Place Within Learning Communities Consist Of Formal Dimensions 40 Informal Dimensions
Strategies for Successful Trainings § § § Principles of Adult Learning. Active Learning. Instructional Strategies.
Principles of Adult Learning § § § Need to know how adults learn best. Adult learners have special needs. Six characteristics of adult learners. • • • Are autonomous and self-directed. Have a foundation of life experiences and knowledge. Are goal-oriented. Are relevancy-oriented. Are practical. Need to be shown respect.
Learning Pyramid* 43 * National Training Laboratories for Applied Behavioral Sciences, Alexandria, VA.
Instructional Strategies § § § § Quiz. Games. Role-playing. Brainstorming. Group problem-solving. Lecture. Simulation. Case Study
The Learning Environment “I know I cannot teach anyone anything. I can only provide the environment in which he can learn…” Carl Rogers (1969) 45
Defining Student-Centred Learning § Brandes & Ginnis (1986: 12) § “with student-centred learning, students are responsible for planning the curriculum or at least they participate in the choosing…the individual is 100% responsible for his own behaviour, participation and learning” § SCL also known as § § § 46 flexible learning independent learning open/distance learning participative learning self-managed learning
Differences between SCL & Traditional Learning § § TRADITIONAL Tutors seen as ‘fountains of all knowledge’ Students adopt passive role Tutor led § § STUDENT-CENTRED Tutor's seen as having ‘facilitator’ role Students adopt active role § § Student taught to set § Student led § Negotiated curriculum § § Learning restricted to § Flexible study pattern § Learning not restricted to syllabus Fixed semesters/terms classroom 47 classroom: time, pace, place
Benefits of Student-Centred Learning § Students § can work alone or in small groups, on and off campus § have access to range of learning resources other than the tutor § can take exams at own convenience § can enrol at flexible times of the year § take ownership of their learning; become reflective learners and be empowered § are motivated and committed towards learning because they become partners in the learning process § can work and learn in partnership 48 Source: Mc. Lean (1997) & Educational Initiative Centre (2004)
Benefits of Student-Centred Learning § Tutors § act as facilitators, guides, mentors § work in teams and draw on the help from technicians, librarians, etc § are able to work with students to determine teaching and learning strategies § develop student’s ability to become a ‘researcher’, accessing multiple sources of information 49 § Institutions § able to attract non-traditional students & students from diverse backgrounds § widen HE participation into the community § more ‘bums on seats’!!! § opportunity to improve ‘bottom line’ performance § gain international reputation § tutor time can be freed up to spend on research and attracting research funding Source: Mc. Lean (1997) & Educational Initiative Centre (2004)
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Constructivist Learning Motivational strategies 50 Cognitive learning theory Collaborative Learning Tools Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Constructivist Learning • Driscoll (2000) describes constructivism as the notion that knowledge exists outside of learners and the act of learning consists of transferring that knowledge from outside to within the learner • Consequently, learning occurs as learners attempt to make sense of their experiences • New information is related to the knowledge and experience already possessed and is used to construct or build new knowledge • Learners take an active role in their learning experience (Villalba & Romiszowski, 2001) 51 Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Constructivist Learning • Online courses can be used to assess information that learner’s possess through the use of online pre-tests • By determining learner knowledge and experience level, instructors may be able to modify instruction to account for those levels • For example, a module could be added that reviews prerequisite skills to help students refresh their memory and to ascertain if students are at the appropriate skill level assumed by the current instruction design Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley 52
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Cognitive learning theory • Cognitive learning theory provides the foundation for developing effective, credible, and robust distance education instruction. • Clark & Mayer (2003) assert “many e-learning courses ignore human cognitive processes and as a result do not optimize learning”. • Villalba & Romiszowski (2001) also purports cognitive psychology should be a basis for designing instruction • Helping the learner select information that is important to the learning process, minimizing extraneous items that do not add to learning, and integrating words and pictures are techniques that can be used to manage cognitive load Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Cognitive learning theory • Specific examples include: • listing learning objectives upfront so the lesson can provide a framework that assists learners in focusing their efforts • minimizing visuals, audio, and text that do not add to the learning experience frees up working memory to rehearse information provided in the lesson • presenting related pictures and words in close proximity of each other Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Collaborative Learning Tools • Some common collaborative tools are: Ø Chats Ø Threaded discussion boards Ø Online conferencing Ø Email Ø Interactive tutorials § Degree of learner concurrency and the learning goal are the primary factors that can determine which, if any, of the collaborative tools will enhance learning • Research shows that learners who study together in an online environment often learn more than those who study alone (Clark & Mayer, 2003) Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Motivational strategies • Keller (1999) offers the ARCS instructional model as a means of integrating motivational tactics into instruction • ARCS is an acronym for what Keller (1999) describes as the four dimensions of motivation – Attention (A), Relevance (R), Confidence (C), and Satisfaction (S). Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley 56
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Motivational strategies § Attention (A) Ø Addresses student interest levels and whether student curiosity is aroused and sustained over a period of time Gaining and maintaining student attention can be achieved through using novel and/or surprising events in instruction, stimulating information-seeking behavior by posing or having students generate questions and then varying the elements of instruction to maintain student interest (Penn State University, 2000). Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Motivational strategies § Relevance (R) Ø Addresses relating instruction to learners experience and values to help them construct knowledge. Adapting instruction to meet learner needs can include the following to help learners integrate new knowledge with previous knowledge and experience : Øusing concrete language Øusing examples and concepts that are related to the learner’s experience and values Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Motivational strategies • Confidence (C) Ø refers to students’ expectations and perceptions regarding the likelihood of their success and who controls that success — the students or the instructor Ø addresses relating instruction to learners experience and values to help them construct knowledge. Informing students of the instructional learning outcomes and providing multiple achievement levels and performance opportunities that allow students to set personal goals and standards to increase the probability of experiencing success positively impacts student confidence 59 March 21, 2006 Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Student-Centered Learning Toolbox Motivational strategies • Satisfaction (S) Ø focuses on the “learner’s intrinsic motivation and response to extrinsic awards” (Mory, 2003, p. 769) Includes the following: Ø providing opportunities for students to practice newly learned skills Ø providing feedback and reinforcements that will sustain the desired behavior Ø maintaining consistent standards and consequences for task accomplishment (Penn State University, 2000) 60 March 21, 2006 Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
Research Findings: Mc. Lean (1997) Table 1: Factors that Encouraged Students to Undertake a Flexible Learning Programme Study whenever have the time 100 Personal development 79 Flexibility: own time, place, pace 76 Inability to attend set courses each week 64 Request a tutorial at own convenience 46 Take examinations in any order 45 Flexible start dates 36 Under no pressure to complete course to deadline 33 Take modules in any sequence 15 61
Another Teaching Method § PRACTICAL EXAMPLES Connecting Theory with Applications § SHOW AND TELL Reversing Student Roles § CASE STUDIES Bringing “Real-Life” Scenarios into the Classroom § GUIDED DESIGN PROJECTS Introducing Practical Design Experience in Classrooms § OPEN-ENDED LABS Making Students Think Deeper § THE FLOWCHART TECHNIQUE Organizing the Flow of Thought § OPEN-ENDED QUIZZES Moving Students Away From Memorization § BRAINSTORMING Encouraging Creativity § QUESTION-AND-ANSWER METHOD Encouraging Student Participation § SOFTWARE Increasing Teaching Efficiency
Teaching Improvement Plan Concept - The concept that you plan to teach Strategy - The teaching strategy that you plan to use Date - The day you plan to use the strategy Materials Needed - The teaching materials that you will need Time Needed - Plan your teaching activity so that you can accomplish all your goals Feedback - Decide on a strategy to obtain student feedback. Consider fast feedback, written reports and observing students’ reactions Do: Execute your plan Check: Review student evaluations Act: Decide on what you would do next time. Stick with the strategy? Change?
martani@ui. ac. id atau dwimartani@yahoo. com http: //staff. blog. ui. ac. id/martani 081318227080 Accounting Department FEUI 64
References Clark, R. C and Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning together on the web. In e-learning and the science of instruction (p. 197 -224). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Pfeiffer. Driscoll, M. P. (2000). Constructivism. In Psychology of Learning for Instruction [Electronic version]. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Keller, J. M. (1999). Using the ARCS motivational process in computer-based instruction and distance education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (78), 39 -47. Retrieved July 14, 2005, from Academic Search Premier database (02710633). Land, S. M. and Hannafin, M. J. (2000). Student-centered learning environments. In Jonassen, D. H. & Land, S. M. (Eds. ), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (p. 1 -23). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Lorenzetti, J. P. (2005). Secrets of online success: Lessons from the community colleges. Distance Education Report, (9)11, 3 -5. Retrieved August 11, 2005, from Academic Search Premier database (1094 -320 X). Macdonald, J. (2004). Developing competent e-learners: The role of assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher education (29)2, 215 -227. Retrieved November 7, 2005, from Academic Search Premier database (0260 -2938). Mory, E. H. (2003). Feedback research revisited. Chapter 29. In Handbook of Research for Educational Communications. Retrieved July 28, 2005, from http: //aect-members. org/m/research_handbook/Chapters/29. pdf Penn State University (2000). College of Education – Innovations in Distance Education. Integrating Instructional Design and Distance Education: ARCS – Motivation Theory. Retrieved October 26, 2005, from http: //ide. ed. psu. edu/idde/ARCS. htm Villalba, C. and Romiszowski, A. J. (2001). Current and ideal practices in designing, developing, and delivering web-based training. In B. H. Khan (Ed. ), Web-based training (pp. 325 -342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. Michele Hampton/Gordon Haley
References Brandes, D. & Ginnis, P. (1986). A Guide to Student-Centred Learning’. Simon & Schuster Education, Hemel Hempstead Cannon, R. & Newble, D. (2000). A Guide to Improving Teaching Methods: A Handbook for Teachers in Universities and Colleges’. Kogan Page, London Educational Initiative Centre (2004). ‘What is Student Centred Learning’. University of Westminster Mc. Lean, J. (1997). ‘Flexible Learning and the Learning Organisation’. MSc Management Dissertation, Staffordshire University Mc. Lean, J. , Hall, L. & Muir, J. (2003). ‘Thee Flexible Tutor: From Lecturer to Facilitator’. British Academy of Management Conference, Edinburgh, September 2000 Rogers, C. (1969). Freedom to Learn. Charles Merrill, Ohio 66
- Slides: 66