Topic Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification

  • Slides: 49
Download presentation

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

Type 2 Diabetes is a CHD Risk Factor Diabetes and Prior MI Predict Mortality

Type 2 Diabetes is a CHD Risk Factor Diabetes and Prior MI Predict Mortality Equally No Diabetes or MI Diabetes without MI MI without Diabetes Survival (%) 100 80 60 Diabetes and MI 40 20 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Year Haffner SM, et al. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 229 -34.

Global projections for the diabetes epidemic: 2003– 2025 48. 4 58. 6 17. 4

Global projections for the diabetes epidemic: 2003– 2025 48. 4 58. 6 17. 4 % 23. 0 36. 2 36% 15. 6 22. 5 44% 39. 3 81. 6 52% 7. 1 15. 0 52. 6 % World 2003 = 194 million (5. 1%) 2025 = 333 million (6. 3%) Increase of 42% 43. 0 75. 8 43. 3% Adapted from IDF Diabetes atlast 2005

Countries with the highest numbers of estimated cases of diabetes for 2030 Egypt Philippines

Countries with the highest numbers of estimated cases of diabetes for 2030 Egypt Philippines Japan Bangladesh Brazil Pakistan Indonesia USA China India 0 20 40 60 80 100 People with diabetes (millions) Adapted from Wild SH et al. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2569– 70.

Prevalence of DM in Thais the National Health Survey 1997 & 2004 Population Survey

Prevalence of DM in Thais the National Health Survey 1997 & 2004 Population Survey for CHD Risk 2000 population age >35 yr 1997 DM prevalence = 4. 8% Males = 4. 3% Females = 5. 3% Urban = 6. 9% Males = 6. 2% Females = 7. 6% Rural = 3. 8% Males = 3. 5% Females = 4. 2% 2000 = 9. 6% = 9. 1% = 10. 0% = 11. 9% = 11. 1% = 12. 6% = 8. 5% = 8. 2 % = 8. 8 % 2004 = 10. 8% = = = =

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

Criteria for Diagnosis of DM Stage Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) (mg/d. L) Normal IFG

Criteria for Diagnosis of DM Stage Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) (mg/d. L) Normal IFG < 100 Random Plasma Glucose (mg/d. L)* < 140 100 - 125 Pre-diabetes IGT DM 140 -199 > 126 > 200** * Testing must be repeated on separate day. FPG is the preferred test ** Symptoms of DM IFG = Impaired fasting glucose IGT = Impaired glucose tolerance Diabetes care 2004; 20 : 7

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

Normoglycaemia Hyperglycaemia Stages Normal glucose IGT and/or IFG tolerance Types (Pre-diabetes) Diabetes Mellitus Not

Normoglycaemia Hyperglycaemia Stages Normal glucose IGT and/or IFG tolerance Types (Pre-diabetes) Diabetes Mellitus Not Insulin insulin requiring for control survival Type 1 • Autoimmune • Idiopathic Type 2 • Predominantly insulin resistance • Predominantly insulin secretory defects Other specific type Gestational diabetes DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1998 ; 15 : 535 -553

Natural History of Type 1 Diabetes Relative Measure of insulin /insulin action Glucose Fasting

Natural History of Type 1 Diabetes Relative Measure of insulin /insulin action Glucose Fasting Glucose Autoimmune B Cell destruction begins Islet cell antibodies appear Genetic background At risk for Type 1 diabetes Insulin Level Time (Age dependent)

Targeting the underlying factors in type 2 diabetes: IR and -cell dysfunction Genetic susceptibility

Targeting the underlying factors in type 2 diabetes: IR and -cell dysfunction Genetic susceptibility obesity, sedentary lifestyle IR glucose uptake -cell dysfunction Impaired insulin secretion hepatic glucose production Type 2 diabetes Adapted from De. Fronzo RA. Diabetes 1988; 37: 667– 87.

Conversion to type 2 diabetes stratified by baseline IR and insulin secretion Insulin resistant

Conversion to type 2 diabetes stratified by baseline IR and insulin secretion Insulin resistant good insulin secretion Insulin sensitive good insulin secretion 1. 5% 28. 5% 16% Insulin sensitive low insulin secretion 54% Insulin resistant low insulin secretion San Antonio Heart Study: baseline status for insulin resistance and insulin secretion in those converted to type 2 diabetes during 7 -year follow up; n = 195 Adapted from Haffner SM et al. Circulation 2000; 101: 975– 80.

IR and -cell dysfunction are fundamental to type 2 diabetes Obesity 350 – Postprandial

IR and -cell dysfunction are fundamental to type 2 diabetes Obesity 350 – Postprandial glucose 300 – Glucose (mg/dl) Uncontrolled hyperglycaemia Diabetes IFG 250 – Fasting glucose 200 – 150 – 100 – 50 – 250 – Relative function (%) IR 200 – 150 – 100 – Clinical diagnosis 50 – Insulin secretion 0– -10 -5 0 5 10 15 Years of diabetes 20 25 30 Adapted from Burger HG et al. 2001. Diabetes Mellitus, Carbohydrate Metabolism, and Lipid Disorders. In Endocrinology. 4 th ed. Edited by LJ De. Groot and JL Jameson. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co. , 2001. Originally published in Type 2 Diabetes BASICS. International Diabetes Center, Minneapolis, 2000.

Progression of type 2 diabetes Preclinical state Normal IGT IFG Primary prevention Clinical state

Progression of type 2 diabetes Preclinical state Normal IGT IFG Primary prevention Clinical state Type 2 DM Secondary prevention Complications Tertiary prevention Disability Death

Decline in -cell function is associated with loss of glycaemic control 9 Hb. A

Decline in -cell function is associated with loss of glycaemic control 9 Hb. A 1 c (%) Conventional 8 Intensive 7 6 0 4. 5– 6. 2% = normal range of Hb. A 1 c 0 3 6 9 12 15 Years from randomisation Adapted from UKPDS Group. UKPDS 33. Lancet 1998; 352: 837– 53.

 -Cell function (% of normal by HOMA) Decline of -Cell Function in the

-Cell function (% of normal by HOMA) Decline of -Cell Function in the UKPDS Illustrates Progressive Nature of Diabetes 100 Time of diagnosis ? 80 60 40 Pancreatic function = 50% of normal 20 0 – 10 – 9 – 8 – 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1 0 1 Time (y) UKPDS=United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study; HOMA=homeostasis model assessment. Adapted from Holman RR. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998; 40(suppl): S 21 -S 25. U. K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Diabetes. 1995; 44: 1249 -1258. 2 3 4 5 6

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

SCREENING FOR DM (ADA) Who? People > 45 years old 2. People < 45

SCREENING FOR DM (ADA) Who? People > 45 years old 2. People < 45 yo. , obesity ( BMI > 25 kg/m 2) with risk factors : 1. Frequency : Every 3 years How ? : Fasting plasma glucose ADA 2006

Screening for diabetes in adult • Age > 45 yr • Overweight (BMI >25

Screening for diabetes in adult • Age > 45 yr • Overweight (BMI >25 kg/m 2) • Family of diabetes (1 st degree relative) • Members of a high-risk ethnic population • Hypertension ( BP >140/90 mm. Hg) • HDL<35 mg/dl or TG >250 mg/dl • Previous IFG or IGT • Previous GDM or baby > 4 kg • Polycystic ovarian syndrome • History of vascular disease • Habitually physically inactive ADA 2006

การวนจฉยโรคเบาหวาน ประกอบดวยอยางนอย 1 ขอ และตองตรวจซำในวนตอมา. 1 Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > 126 mg/dl or.

การวนจฉยโรคเบาหวาน ประกอบดวยอยางนอย 1 ขอ และตองตรวจซำในวนตอมา. 1 Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > 126 mg/dl or. 2 Casual plasma glucose (CPG) > 200 mg/dl + Symptoms or 2 -hour glucose concentration. 3> 200 mg/dl at 75 gram oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT( WHO 1998 ADA 2005

The Metabolic Syndrome • In 1988, Reaven proposed the existence of a metabolic syndrome

The Metabolic Syndrome • In 1988, Reaven proposed the existence of a metabolic syndrome • Constellation of risk factors for CVD • Use the term • • • Metabolic syndrome Syndrome X Insulin resistance syndrome Definition of Metabolic Syndrome. Circulation 2004; 109: 433 -438

Metabolic syndrome IDF 2005 • Central obesity (BMI>30, waist circ. need not to be

Metabolic syndrome IDF 2005 • Central obesity (BMI>30, waist circ. need not to be measured) waist circumference* 94 cm for Europid men 80 cm for Europid women, * with ethnicity specific values for other groups + > 2 criteria • Plasma glucose • Hypertriglyceridemia • Low HDL > 100 mg/dl > 150 mg/dl < 40 mg/dl (men); < 50 mg/dl (women) • Hypertension ≥ 130/85 mm. Hg IDF Consensus Worldwide Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome. www. idf. org.

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

Acute Complications of Diabetes Mellitus - Hypoglycemia - Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) - Hyperosmolar Nonketotic

Acute Complications of Diabetes Mellitus - Hypoglycemia - Diabetic Ketoacidosis (DKA) - Hyperosmolar Nonketotic Diabetic coma (HONK) Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state - Infection (HHS)

50% of type 2 diabetes patients have complications at the time of diagnosis 1

50% of type 2 diabetes patients have complications at the time of diagnosis 1 MICROVASCULAR MACROVASCULAR Retinopathy, glaucoma or cataracts Cerebrovascular disease Nephropathy Coronary heart disease Neuropathy Peripheral vascular disease 1 UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. UKPDS 33. Lancet 1998; 352: 837– 53.

Diabetes Is Associated With Significant Global Morbidity and Mortality Morbidity 1, 2 • •

Diabetes Is Associated With Significant Global Morbidity and Mortality Morbidity 1, 2 • • CVD • 2 -4 times more likely to develop myocardial infarction or stroke Neuropathy • Up to 50% of persons with diabetes • A leading cause of amputation Retinopathy • A leading cause of blindness • After 15 years of diabetes • 2% blindness • 10% severe visual handicap Nephropathy • A leading cause of kidney failure • Accelerates CVD Mortality 2 • Annual diabetesassociated deaths worldwide • >800, 000 directly attributed to diabetes • ~4 million attributed to complications of diabetes • 50% of deaths in persons with diabetes in industrialised countries are due to CVD=cardiovascular disease. 1. International Diabetes Federation. Available at: http: //www. idf. org/home/index. cfm? node=201. Accessed 15 May 2004. 2. World Health Organization. Available at: http: //www. who. int/hpr/NPH/docs/gs_diabetes. pdf. Accessed 11 April 2004.

A 1% decrease in Hb. A 1 c significantly reduces microvascular and macrovascular complications

A 1% decrease in Hb. A 1 c significantly reduces microvascular and macrovascular complications Percentage reduction in relative risk corresponding to a 1% fall in Hb. A 1 c Any Diabetesdiabetes-related endpoint death All cause mortality MI Stroke 14% 12% * * Peripheral vascular Microvascular Cataract disease* extraction 0 – 5 – 10 21% – 15 43% 37% ** – 20 – 25 * 19% * * – 30 – 35 – 40 – 45 * * – 50 Lower extremity amputation or fatal peripheral vascular disease *P < 0. 0001; **P = 0. 035 Adapted from Stratton IM et al. UKPDS 35. BMJ 2000; 321: 405– 12.

Tight BP Control

Tight BP Control

UKPDS: Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Identified 5 major

UKPDS: Risk Factors for Coronary Artery Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Identified 5 major risk factors for CAD: Dyslipidemia (High LDL, Low HDL) Hyperglycemia Hypertension Smoking Turner, RC et al. BMJ 316: 823 -8, 1998

Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes

Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ( STENO 2

Multifactorial Intervention and Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes ( STENO 2 ) • Randomized study to evaluate effect on CVD of an intensified, targeted, multifactorial intervention in T 2 DM with microalbuminuria • 160 patients follow up means 7. 8 years • Interventions: dietary, exercise, ACEI or ARB, vitamin mineral supplement, 150 mg ASA, tight glycemic, BP and lipid control

Primary composite endpoint* (%) Steno-2: effect of intensive versus conventional treatment on cardiovascular complications

Primary composite endpoint* (%) Steno-2: effect of intensive versus conventional treatment on cardiovascular complications 60 50 Conventional therapy 40 ~50% reduction 30 20 10 Intensive therapy 0 0 12 24 36 48 60 72 Months of follow-up 84 96 Conventional 80 72 70 63 59 50 44 42 13 Intensive 78 74 71 66 63 61 59 19 n 80 *Primary composite endpoint of death from cardiovascular causes, non -fatal MI, CABG, percutaneous coronary intervention, non-fatal stroke, amputation or surgery for peripheral atherosclerotic artery disease Gaede P et al. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 383– 93.

Percentage of patients who reached the intensive-treatment goals at a mean of 7. 8

Percentage of patients who reached the intensive-treatment goals at a mean of 7. 8 y Patients % P <0. 001 P =0. 21 P =0. 19 P =0. 001 P=0. 06

DCCT/EDIC: Glycaemic control reduces the risk of non-fatal MI, stroke or death from CVD

DCCT/EDIC: Glycaemic control reduces the risk of non-fatal MI, stroke or death from CVD in type 1 diabetes Hb. A 1 C (%) 9 Conventional treatment 8 Intensive treatment 7 0 Cumulative incidence of non-fatal MI, stroke or death from CVD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DCCT (intervention period) 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 EDIC (observational follow-up) • Concept of Glucose memory: the better the control of glucose early in disease, the 57% risk reduction less the risk of complications later even in non-fatal MI, stroke or CVD death* control is less satisfactory. … in type (P =when 0. 02; 95% CI: 12– 79%) 1 diabetes without insulin resistance etc 0. 06 0. 04 0. 02 Years Conventional treatment Intensive treatment 0. 00 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DCCT (intervention period) *Intensive versus conventional treatment 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 EDIC (observational follow-up) Years Adapted from DCCT. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977– 986. DCCT/EDIC. JAMA 2002; 287: 2563– 2569. DCCT/EDIC. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2643– 2653.

UKPDS: Risk Reduction: Glucose Control Study (After median 8. 5 yr. post-trial follow- up)

UKPDS: Risk Reduction: Glucose Control Study (After median 8. 5 yr. post-trial follow- up) 1997 2002 2007 Legacy 12% 10% effect P=0. 033 P=0. 029 Any diabetes related end point Microvascular disease 9% P=0. 040 25% 28% 24% p = 0. 009 p = 0. 001 Myocardial infarction 16% 14% p = 0. 052 p = 0. 042 15% P=0. 014 All cause mortality 6% 11% p = 0. 440 p = 0. 071 13% P=0. 007 Concept of glucose? memory: valid in type 2 diabetes

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM

Topic • • Epidemiology of DM Diagnosis of DM Classification & pathogenesis of DM Screening of diabetes Metabolic syndrome Complication of DM Goal in management of DM

 • Prevention of S/S of hyper/hypoglycemia • Prevention of acute and chronic complications

• Prevention of S/S of hyper/hypoglycemia • Prevention of acute and chronic complications • Good quality of life

Current recommendations of the Canadian and American Diabetes Associations “Diabetes must be. . .

Current recommendations of the Canadian and American Diabetes Associations “Diabetes must be. . . diagnosed earlier. And once diagnosed, all types of diabetes must then be managed much more aggressively” Canadian Diabetes Association “Therefore, the results of the UKPDS mandate that treatment of type 2 diabetes include aggressive efforts to lower blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible” ADA Canadian Diabetes Association. Can J Diabetes 2003; 27 (Suppl 2): 1– 163; ADA. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: S 28– 32.

GOAL Goal Plasma glucose - Average pre-prandial PG (mg/dl) 90 -130 - Peak postprandial

GOAL Goal Plasma glucose - Average pre-prandial PG (mg/dl) 90 -130 - Peak postprandial PG (mg/dl) <180 - Hb. A 1 C (%) <7 (6. 5%) Lipid - Total Chol (mg/dl) <200 (180) - Triglyceride (mg/dl) <150 - HDL-C (mg/dl) M>40, F>50 - LDL-C : - age <40, total chol + 135<risk factor < 100 mg/dl - age >40, total chol , 135< 30 -40% of LDL-C ( (100 > -overt CVD ( very high risk) <70 BP (mm. Hg) <130/<80 ADA 2006

Goals of Glycemic Control ADA ACCE EASD IDF Hb. A 1 c (4. 0

Goals of Glycemic Control ADA ACCE EASD IDF Hb. A 1 c (4. 0 -6. 0%) < 7. 0% 6. 5% FPG (preprandial) < 130 110 110 Postprandial < 180 140 Bedtime PG < 150 ? 135 ? 1. ADA. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: S 15– 35; 2. ADA Diabetes Care 2002; 25: S 35– 49; 3. Feld S. Endocrine Pract 2002; 8 (Suppl 1): 40– 82; 4. Asian-Pacific Type 2 Diabetes Policy Group. Type 2 diabetes: Practical targetsand treatment. 3 rd Edn; Hong Kong: Asian-Pacific Type 2 Diabetes Policy Group, 2002.

2008

2008

2008

2008