Tiger Claw Deck Fasteners Senior Design Group Sean

  • Slides: 26
Download presentation
Tiger Claw Deck Fasteners Senior Design Group Sean OKeeffe, James Bagg, Bo Song, Aaron

Tiger Claw Deck Fasteners Senior Design Group Sean OKeeffe, James Bagg, Bo Song, Aaron Wagner, and Jon Gardner

Introduction Tiger Claw is a company that sells hidden fasteners in the deck building

Introduction Tiger Claw is a company that sells hidden fasteners in the deck building industry. l Tiger Claw deck fasteners are sold in more than 120 retail outlets nationwide. l Tiger Claw is the user and sponsor for the design. l

Introduction The project idea was to design a gun/hidden fastener combination. l Current fasteners

Introduction The project idea was to design a gun/hidden fastener combination. l Current fasteners are a 4 or 6 step process. l This product could give them an advantage in an open and growing market. l

Customer Needs l l l l Faster process. Reliable fastener. Viable cost. Maintain 3/16”

Customer Needs l l l l Faster process. Reliable fastener. Viable cost. Maintain 3/16” spacing. 1 person/step process. Safe installment. Ease of use (set up, use, maintain). Goal was to make process viable for the mid to large sized contractor.

Specifications Small time installing fasteners (<5 sec). l Upheaval test for fastener. l Visibility

Specifications Small time installing fasteners (<5 sec). l Upheaval test for fastener. l Visibility test for acceptable 3/16” spacing. l Cost (Affordable for contractor). l Customer acceptance rating (90%). l Ergonomic rating (90%). l Design for Lifetime (>5 years). l Weatherproof and Durable (Drop test). l

CONCEPT GENERATION -12 Original Ideas -Constraints -Customer Needs -Feasibility -Elimination Tools

CONCEPT GENERATION -12 Original Ideas -Constraints -Customer Needs -Feasibility -Elimination Tools

-Concepts Narrowed -Constructive Criticism -Concepts Built Up Again -Continuous Brainstorming Process

-Concepts Narrowed -Constructive Criticism -Concepts Built Up Again -Continuous Brainstorming Process

Selection Criteria

Selection Criteria

Concept Selection l Originator (Original and Penetrator) l Combination of two designs Shoots from

Concept Selection l Originator (Original and Penetrator) l Combination of two designs Shoots from above deck l Uses anvil to split staple l Rollers for quick installation l

Concept Selection (cont) l Helicopter l Two-step process l Drive nail into joist l

Concept Selection (cont) l Helicopter l Two-step process l Drive nail into joist l Torque edges into floorboards l High upheaval strength

Concept Selection (cont) l Poseidon l Shot from side/below deck l 3 -pronged staple

Concept Selection (cont) l Poseidon l Shot from side/below deck l 3 -pronged staple l Anvil to redirect staple Capable of fully constraining project l Adjustable spacing between deck boards l

Critical Subsystems l Originator l Constraining Both Deck Boards l Syncing the Feed Mechanism

Critical Subsystems l Originator l Constraining Both Deck Boards l Syncing the Feed Mechanism l Bending Fastener Within the Board Gap l Conflicting Forces l Possibly Need to be a Two Step Process

Critical Subsystems l Helicopter l Feed Mechanism l Extremely l Two-Step Process Required Possibly

Critical Subsystems l Helicopter l Feed Mechanism l Extremely l Two-Step Process Required Possibly l Two l Difficult Triggers, Two Cylinders? Constraining Both Deck Boards

Critical Subsystems l Poseidon l Pneumatic Cylinder Below Decking l Parallel to Deck Boards

Critical Subsystems l Poseidon l Pneumatic Cylinder Below Decking l Parallel to Deck Boards – Large, Awkward l Perpendicular to Deck Boards – Additional Mechanism to Force Staple into Boards. l Feeding Mechanism Below Decking

Questions? ?

Questions? ?