The Yellow Card Scheme Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions

  • Slides: 50
Download presentation
The Yellow Card Scheme: Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions

The Yellow Card Scheme: Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions

Objectives • • What is an Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)? Classification of ADRs How

Objectives • • What is an Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR)? Classification of ADRs How common are ADRs? Identifying an ADR How to avoid ADRs The Yellow Card Scheme What to report Information to include on a Yellow Card

What is an adverse drug reaction? An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is an unwanted

What is an adverse drug reaction? An adverse drug reaction (ADR) is an unwanted or harmful reaction experienced following the administration of a drug or combination of drugs under normal conditions of use and is suspected to be related to the drug.

Adverse drug reaction or adverse event • • • Terms often used interchangeably not

Adverse drug reaction or adverse event • • • Terms often used interchangeably not always correct. Adverse drug reaction is an unwanted or harmful reaction experienced following the administration of a drug e. g. patient experiencing anaphylaxis shortly after taking a drug. Adverse event is any undesirable event experienced by a patient while taking a drug, regardless of whether the drug is suspected to be related to the event e. g. patient having a road traffic accident while on a specific medication.

Classification of ADRs Common ADRs • Type A (‘Augmented’) • Predictable, dose related –

Classification of ADRs Common ADRs • Type A (‘Augmented’) • Predictable, dose related – Constipation with opioids • Usually not severe – Peptic ulceration following NSAID use

Classification of ADRs Uncommon but often well recognised ADRs • Type B (‘Bizarre’) •

Classification of ADRs Uncommon but often well recognised ADRs • Type B (‘Bizarre’) • Unpredictable, not dose related • May be very severe / fatal – Achilles tendonitis caused by quinolone antibiotics – Stevens-Johnson syndrome following lamotrigine therapy • With new drugs ADRs not well recognised

Classification of ADRs • Type C (`Chronic treatment effects’) - osteoporosis with steroids •

Classification of ADRs • Type C (`Chronic treatment effects’) - osteoporosis with steroids • Type D (`Delayed effects’) - drug induced cancers • Reports of skin cancers, lymphomas and other cancers following topical pimecrolimus and tacrolimus 1 • Type E (`End of treatment effects’) – withdrawal syndromes • Headache, anxiety, dizziness sleep disturbances, gastro-intestinal disturbances after stopping paroxetine.

Classification of ADRs • Type F (`Failure of therapy’) – unexpected failure of therapy

Classification of ADRs • Type F (`Failure of therapy’) – unexpected failure of therapy due to drug interaction • St Johns Wort reducing efficacy of combined hormonal contraceptives • Type G (Genetic or genomic) – Irreversible genetic damage • Carcinogens • Genotoxins • Teratogens

Examples of ADRs • Common and well established ADRs – Constipation with opioids –

Examples of ADRs • Common and well established ADRs – Constipation with opioids – Abdominal pain and diarrhoea with erythromycin therapy. – Nausea when starting fluoxetine – Gastrointestinal symptoms with NSAIDs • Uncommon but well recognised ADRs – Achilles tendonitis caused by quinolone antibiotics – Visual field defects with vigabatrin • Uncommon emerging ADRs – Depression with rimonabant – AF with bisphonates – Hepatoxicity with lumiracoxib

Why are ADRs important? • Major clinical problem – increase morbidity and mortality. –

Why are ADRs important? • Major clinical problem – increase morbidity and mortality. – ADRs are related to 6. 5% hospital admissions in adults, and 2. 1% in children 2 – 6. 7% hospitalised patients suffer`serious’ ADRs 1 – 0. 15% of hospital patients suffer fatal ADRs (= 5700 deaths per year) 1, 2 – ADRS are 4 th leading cause of death in the USA 1 – Increase hospital stay. ADRs result in the use of seven 800 bed UK hospitals per year. 2 – Financial burden on NHS £ 466 m 2 – Up to 40% patients in the community experience ADRs 3 1 Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of ADRs in hospitalised patients. JAMA. 1998; 279: 1200 -1205. 2 Pirmohamed M, James S, Meakin S et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004; 329(7456): 15 -9. 3 Martyrs C. Adverse reactions to drugs in general practice. BMJ 1979; 2: 1194 -1197

ADRs can also… • Adversely affect patient compliance • Reduce available choice of drug

ADRs can also… • Adversely affect patient compliance • Reduce available choice of drug treatment • Reduce potential efficacy of drug treatment • Reduce quality of life • Cause diagnostic confusion • Reduce a patient’s confidence in their healthcare professional(s)

Who might get an ADR? Anyone who takes a medicine! Differential diagnosis should include

Who might get an ADR? Anyone who takes a medicine! Differential diagnosis should include the possibility of an ADR if the patient is taking any form of medication

Who is most at risk from ADRs? • • • The elderly Children Co-existing

Who is most at risk from ADRs? • • • The elderly Children Co-existing diseases Females Atopic individuals Polypharmacy – 50% of patients on 5 drugs or more

ADRs are an increasing public health problem • Factors: – Increase in elderly population

ADRs are an increasing public health problem • Factors: – Increase in elderly population (4 x as likely to have ADR)1 – Increase in polypharmacy – Increase in availability of OTC medicines – Increase in use of herbal/traditional medicines – Increase in medicines available via the internet 1 Pharm World & Science 2002; 24(2): 46 -54

Are ADRs avoidable? • 70% ADRs are potentially avoidable 1 • More rational Prescribing

Are ADRs avoidable? • 70% ADRs are potentially avoidable 1 • More rational Prescribing – Avoid unnecessary drug use – Dose optimisation – identify drugs known to produce dose-related side effects – Avoid / reduce drug interactions – Consider prophylactic therapy where appropriate – Avoid new / black triangle drugs – Avoid prescribing contra-indicated drugs – Drug use in an inappropriate clinical indication – Check drug history before prescribing • Consider risk factors for ADRs – Polypharmacy – Age extremes – Reduced hepatic and renal function • Patient counselling re ADR’s 2 • Better monitoring of treatment 3 • Better communication 4 1 Howard et al BJCP 2007 Feb; 63(2): 136 -47 2 BMJ 2006; 333: 522 3 BMJ 2003; 327; 1179 -1181 4 Archives of Internal medicine 2006; 145(4): 284 -293

What should raise your suspicion? • Timing with drug treatment. • Abnormal clinical measurements

What should raise your suspicion? • Timing with drug treatment. • Abnormal clinical measurements while on drug therapy e. g. B. P, temp, pulse, blood glucose and weight • Abnormal laboratory results while on drug therapy. Could be biochemical or haematological • New therapy started which could be used to treat ADR • Patient risk factors • Listen to patients own concerns

Assessing causality • • Nature of the reaction Timing Relationship to dose Other possible

Assessing causality • • Nature of the reaction Timing Relationship to dose Other possible causes for the symptoms Improvement when drug(s) stopped Has reaction been reported before Dechallenge/Rechallenge

How common are ADRs? • Drugs most commonly implicated include NSAID, aspirin, diuretics and

How common are ADRs? • Drugs most commonly implicated include NSAID, aspirin, diuretics and warfarin 1 • Aspirin was most frequent cause for admission 2 – 18% ADR related admissions – 162 (74%) patients on aspirin 75 mg OD – 157 (72%) gastro-intestinal bleeding • In the UK Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug (NSAID) use alone accounts for 3 – 65, 000 emergency admissions/year – 12, 000 ulcer bleeding episodes/year – 2, 000 deaths/year 1 Howard RL et al. Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 63: (2)136 -147 2 Pirmohamed M et al. Adverse drug reactions as cause of admission to hospital: prospective analysis of 18 820 patients. BMJ. 2004; 329(7456): 15 -9. 3. Blower et al. Emergency admissions for upper gastrointestinal disease and their relation to NSAID use. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997; 11:

The Yellow Card Scheme • Introduced in 1964 after thalidomide tragedy • Spontaneous reports

The Yellow Card Scheme • Introduced in 1964 after thalidomide tragedy • Spontaneous reports of suspected adverse drug reactions. • Acts as an early warning system to identify ADRs and risk factors • Over 600, 000 confidential reports have been received in UK • Doctors, dentists, pharmacists, coroners, nurses, midwifes, health visitors • Non-medical prescribers • and now patients • MHRA can detect duplicate reports

Patients can report suspected side effects: • online at www. yellowcard. gov. uk •

Patients can report suspected side effects: • online at www. yellowcard. gov. uk • using the form inside this leaflet found in pharmacies • by calling the Yellow Card hotline on 0808 100 3352

Why report ADRs? • Important role in patient safety • Allows continual safety monitoring

Why report ADRs? • Important role in patient safety • Allows continual safety monitoring of drugs – old & new • New drugs - lack of experience on adverse effects – Exposure in about 1500 people only – Short duration – Unlikely to detect ADRs • Less frequent than 1/1500 • With long latency – Lack of experience in special patient groups • Elderly, children, pregnancy, multiple disease, polypharmacy • To detect rare adverse effects

Strengths of Yellow Card Scheme • Acts as ‘early warning system’ for identification of

Strengths of Yellow Card Scheme • Acts as ‘early warning system’ for identification of previously unrecognised reactions • Provides information about factors which predispose patients to ADRs • Allows comparisons of ADR ‘profiles’ between products within same therapeutic class • Continual safety monitoring of a product throughout its life span as a therapeutic agent

Weaknesses of Yellow Card Scheme • Cannot provide estimates of risk as – true

Weaknesses of Yellow Card Scheme • Cannot provide estimates of risk as – true number of cases is underestimated – total number of patients exposed is unknown • Relies on ADR being recognised • Not all ADRs are reported – Only 10% serious reactions reported • May be stimulated by promotion and publicity • Reporting high for newly marketed drugs and falls off over time • Reports do not imply causality

Why are reporting rates low? • • • Too busy Not sure what to

Why are reporting rates low? • • • Too busy Not sure what to report Uncertain of the threshold for a serious reaction Not easy to find a Yellow Card Not my responsibility It takes too long to complete a card Reporting generates too much extra work Duplication Belief that serious ADRs will be identified in clinical trials • Confidentiality

Completing a Yellow Card

Completing a Yellow Card

On-line • Simple • Fast • Drop-down menus • Allows reporter to register on

On-line • Simple • Fast • Drop-down menus • Allows reporter to register on the site • The Yellow Card can be saved at any time www. yellowcard. gov. uk

Who can report? • • • Doctors, dentists, coroners Hospital pharmacists - 1997 Community

Who can report? • • • Doctors, dentists, coroners Hospital pharmacists - 1997 Community pharmacists - 1999 Nurses, midwives and health visitors - 2002 Patients – 2008 (pilot scheme from October 2005) Pharmaceutical companies have a legal obligation to report • Over 600, 000 reports received to date on voluntary basis • MHRA can detect duplicate reports

What to report • Report all suspected adverse drug reactions for – new drugs

What to report • Report all suspected adverse drug reactions for – new drugs (marked ▼) - even if mild – established drugs that are serious - even if well recognised Serious reactions include those which are fatal, lifethreatening, disabling or incapacitating, result in or prolong hospitalisation, congenital abnormalities or medically significant • Reactions in children • Drug interactions • Herbal medicines Causality does not need to be established

Black triangle drugs▼ • ▼indicates that the CHM/MHRA are intensively monitoring that product •

Black triangle drugs▼ • ▼indicates that the CHM/MHRA are intensively monitoring that product • ▼will be assigned to a product because: • • • the drug is new to the UK market the drug is being administered to the patient either by a new route of administration or a new formulation which is considered may have an impact on the already established risk/benefit profile of that drug The drug is being administered for a new indication

Areas of special interest • • Children Elderly Delayed drug effects (e. g. cancers)

Areas of special interest • • Children Elderly Delayed drug effects (e. g. cancers) Congenital anomalies Herbal remedies OTC medicines HIV medicines

If you suspect an ADR… Do not assume someone else will report it •

If you suspect an ADR… Do not assume someone else will report it • Only 2 -4% of all ADRs are reported • Only 10% of serious suspected ADRs are reported Do you have to be completely certain that what you have seen is an ADR? No

Information to include on a Yellow Card 4 critical pieces of information that must

Information to include on a Yellow Card 4 critical pieces of information that must be included on the report : s Suspected drug(s) s Suspect reaction(s) s Patient details s Reporter details

Suspected Drug(s) • Name of medicine – including brand batch number if known •

Suspected Drug(s) • Name of medicine – including brand batch number if known • Route of administration • Daily dose • Date medicine started – and stopped if applicable • Reason why the medication was given • Multiple drugs can be listed if more than one drug is suspected of causing the reaction

Suspect reaction(s) • • Describe the reaction Include a diagnosis if relevant Include when

Suspect reaction(s) • • Describe the reaction Include a diagnosis if relevant Include when the reaction occurred whether the reaction was considered to be serious and complete tick box for reasons why • Document if any treatment was given for the reaction • Eventual outcome tick relevant box

Patient Details • • Sex of the patient Age at time of reaction Weight

Patient Details • • Sex of the patient Age at time of reaction Weight if known Do not need to know name or DOB as this could identify patient and break patient confidentiality • Patients initials and local identification number (hospital or practice number) which will identify patient to you in the event of future correspondence

Reporter details • Must be completed in all cases • Name and full address

Reporter details • Must be completed in all cases • Name and full address – Need to acknowledge receipt of report and follow up further information if necessary. • Profession

Additional useful information • Other medication in the last three months including herbal and

Additional useful information • Other medication in the last three months including herbal and over the counter meds. • Use additional sheets if necessary. • If no other meds are being taken or if no more information is available say so • Include details of any: – rechallenges – relevant medical history – test results – known allergies – suspected drug interactions

What happens to a Yellow card once received? Yellow Cards Adverse Drug Reaction reports

What happens to a Yellow card once received? Yellow Cards Adverse Drug Reaction reports Acknowledgmen t and/or followup for more info Provision of information Report details entered to Sentinel database Commit to database Assessment Signal detection Impact Analysis Signal Evaluation and Prioritisation Risk-benefit evaluation and advice from CHM Regulatory action and communication

How is the Yellow Card data used to improve patient safety? 1. Changes to

How is the Yellow Card data used to improve patient safety? 1. Changes to SPC e. g. restriction in use, special warnings and precautions 2. Publication of 3. Issue of ‘Dear Healthcare professional’ letters 4. Drug Analysis Prints (DAPs) 5. Withdrawal of a medicines if patient safety is threatened

Drug Safety Update • Published monthly • Register for alerts http: //www. mhra. gov.

Drug Safety Update • Published monthly • Register for alerts http: //www. mhra. gov. uk/ Publications/Safetyguid ance/Drug. Safety. Update/ index. htm

Drug Analysis Prints (DAPs) • Complete list of all suspected ADRs reported via yellow

Drug Analysis Prints (DAPs) • Complete list of all suspected ADRs reported via yellow card scheme for named suspect drug • Inclusion of a particular reaction does not necessarily mean it has been caused by the drug • Certain reported reactions are conditions which occur spontaneously • Should not be used for determining incidence • Reporting rates are influenced by seriousness of ADR, ease of recognition, extent of use www. mhra. gov. uk/daps

System Organ Class Totals

System Organ Class Totals

Reactions under High Level Term (HLT) Reaction Preferred Term (PT)

Reactions under High Level Term (HLT) Reaction Preferred Term (PT)

Examples of ADRs identified by Yellow Card Scheme • Vigabatrin and visual field defects

Examples of ADRs identified by Yellow Card Scheme • Vigabatrin and visual field defects – 3 reports severe persistent visual field constriction – detected 2 -3 years after starting therapy – resulted in a change of recommended dosage, range of indications and addition of warnings • Cyproterone acetate and hepatotoxicity – dose related – restricted indications – requirement for hepatic function monitoring • Alendronate and severe oesophageal reactions – warnings and revised dosing instructions • Varenicline and depression and suicidal ideation – reports received in the 1 st 12 months after launch – addition of warnings and monitoring in patients with history of psychiatric illness

Where to find ADR information • Reference texts – – – – • British

Where to find ADR information • Reference texts – – – – • British National Formulary (BNF) Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) Martindale AHFS Drug information Meyler’s 'The Side effects of drugs Davies’ textbook Adverse Drug Reactions Lee’s textbook Adverse Drug Reactions Journals – Adverse Drug Reaction Bulletin – Drug Safety Update – Medline/Embase/Pharmline search • Electronic sources – Micromedex – www. mhra. gov. uk

“All health-care professionals have a responsibility to inform colleagues about clinically important adverse drug

“All health-care professionals have a responsibility to inform colleagues about clinically important adverse drug reactions that they detect, even if a well-recognised or causal link is uncertain. ” Edwards IR and Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000; 356: 1255 -59

If you suspect an ADR…. do not assume someone else will report it! www.

If you suspect an ADR…. do not assume someone else will report it! www. yellowcard. gov. uk